HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4961  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2013, 3:36 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joat View Post
I like the design a lot. I hope they don't try to hide the fact that its a casino too much. Id love to see some vegas style lights and signs.

So this casino will have the same number of slots and tables as the current edgewater?
Yup.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4962  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2013, 3:53 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Another Panel member thought the colour and reflectivity of the glass wouldn’t work in Vancouver.
Urrrgh

Has "no mechanical ventilation" ever worked well? The current Edgewater has super poor air quality and now they're going to screw up the new one. Gamblers are stinky, smoky disgusting people and need fresh air.

The CNV library has this too and it's stifling all the time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4963  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 4:10 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Strange and deceiving rendering from Changing City. What's with that grass and those trees?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4964  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 3:09 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,607
^^^^ Maybe Concord changed their mind about One Pacific and turned it into a park for property tax relief instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4965  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 5:57 PM
Graham_Yvr's Avatar
Graham_Yvr Graham_Yvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Strange and deceiving rendering from Changing City. What's with that grass and those trees?

From the Changing City's blog post:

"We particularly like this render from the Las Vegas press who can’t be expected to know that the gorgeous lawn is in fact the location of Concord Pacific’s One Pacific residential scheme, now under construction."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4966  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 8:08 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham_Yvr View Post
From the Changing City's blog post:
"We particularly like this render from the Las Vegas press who can’t be expected to know that the gorgeous lawn is in fact the location of Concord Pacific’s One Pacific residential scheme, now under construction."
I must say that I didn't read the blog posting, but I wasn't thinking a newspaper would be doing their own renderings. Just thought this is some oddball version among the real ones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4967  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 3:20 AM
Joat's Avatar
Joat Joat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 226
So if they are planning to get approval to expand their amount of tables and machines, I guess they will just have some extra convention and conference space that can be easily converted into gaming space? Ideally theyd get approval to expand while its under construction and save them a lot of trouble; though Id imagine they will have to wait much longer than that to try again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4968  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 3:34 AM
PeterAKer PeterAKer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 117
The current revised design is awful I much preferred the original design. I just doesn't fit the feel of the Stadium nor the new development next door.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4969  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 5:39 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joat View Post
So if they are planning to get approval to expand their amount of tables and machines, I guess they will just have some extra convention and conference space that can be easily converted into gaming space? Ideally theyd get approval to expand while its under construction and save them a lot of trouble; though Id imagine they will have to wait much longer than that to try again.
Where did you hear this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4970  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 6:46 AM
Joat's Avatar
Joat Joat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 226
I think a few articles (and maybe some SSPers) mentioned that they could try again later. That's what a lot of the people protesting the casino seem to be worried about anyway.

I just found this recent one where they ask the preident of paragon if theyll try to expand later.

Quote:
"Asked if the design would allow the casino to be expanded later, Paragon president Scott Menke said the company is “not contemplating that right now.”

“We heard very clearly from city council that it was 600 machines and 75 table games. So we are going into this reconcepting this as an urban resort with much more emphasis on hotel rooms and engagement with B.C. Place and surrounding entertainment areas,” Mr. Menke said."
source: Globe and Mail

I'd imagine they still hope to make it a destination casino. But I think it will only be more difficult to expand as time goes on, since more and more condos (and even an elementary school if i recall?) are popping up in the 'entertainment district'.

EDIT: If your question was in regards to me assuming they will turn convention or conference space into gaming space its just my guess. I have zero insider info or expertise on the matter.

Last edited by Joat; Nov 29, 2013 at 8:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4971  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 5:00 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Ah okay, I just mean that they were asked flat out during the press conference if they were going to leave extra space to look to expand the casino down the road and they said no.

Yes, I know it might just be lip service but I doubt it will ever get approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4972  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2013, 4:48 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joat View Post
source: Globe and Mail

I'd imagine they still hope to make it a destination casino. But I think it will only be more difficult to expand as time goes on, since more and more condos (and even an elementary school if i recall?) are popping up in the 'entertainment district'.
Yup, every good entertainment district needs an elementary school in it. Good grief Vancouver...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4973  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2013, 10:03 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,618
The school is over on the other side of BC Place - at International Village (next to the future super-road).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4974  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2013, 5:53 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
...In the Village that is not very International and the road that certainly is anything but "super," we add a district that is anything but "entertaining." (unless you find looking at street level townhomes devoid of any commercial value entertaining)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4975  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2013, 6:18 PM
city-dweller's Avatar
city-dweller city-dweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 357
The whole super-road label is to mollify those freaking out about the viaducts removal. The road will be essentially an extension of pacific boulevard with a tie-into Georgia street.

Now relating to this thread, I noticed yesterday while walking around false creek that they have added a few transmitters/antennae looking devices on the stadium. What is odd is they are located just on top of the lower window box just above the north side road, and they were added recently. My question is why didn't they put these higher up completely out of sight and why were they only recently added?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4976  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2013, 11:32 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Here is a detailed fly-through of the entertainment district Edmonton is building around its new arena: http://downloads.oilers.nhl.com/arena/flyover.mov


And here are a few renders of the arena:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4977  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 1:06 AM
rsxstock rsxstock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 274
^wish we had some dominant "chic" structures like that
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4978  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 3:37 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Rogers Place? Seriously?

Looks nice otherwise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4979  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 5:21 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
I prefer living in architectural cesspool of obscurity. It makes travelling more enjoyable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4980  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 7:43 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Ugh, I briefly thought that our Rogers Arena was going to be re-wrapped like that.

Gotta put all that oil money to use somehow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.