Quote:
Originally Posted by Makid
The only way this would be better is if they planned to add the possible future Trax line through the site and added housing above at least 1/2 to 2/3 of the parking sea.
There is limited bus service there now and even if Proposition 1 passes, there will still be limited bus service there. Trax may expand through there in 2040 but even that route isn't guaranteed.
Riverton and Herriman should work with UTA to increase bus service in the area so that the parking can be reduced. They should also work with the developer and other developers to increase housing density nearby.
This would increase the captive audience while saving infrastructure costs. Building the plan that they have is horrific at best.
Without any residential built into the project, this will just be stealing retail from another area. Retail developments of this size in SL and Davis Counties should all include residential and commercial. 1/8 to 1/4 a residential unit for every parking space for retail. Commercial should be rated at 5 sq feet for every parking space.
Ideally, my parking ratios would be higher but for the location I think this would be good. It would increase residential and commercial options there while also increasing a demand for better transit options.
Developers would be able to exceed these parking ratios but shouldn't be under them. If they exceed them, it would increase pressure to extend Trax faster while also increasing the need for better bus service.
But alas, this won't happen. Even in the article they state that they don't expect anything to change development wise in the area for multiple generations.
|
I'm of the feeling now that every region should be on their own to fund their transit projects. I don't want UTA money from SLC going to encourage and retrofit these suburbs; if they want to build with transit to protect their investment, then they should impact fee in such a way that they can build for their transit needs.
I don't understand retail in Utah. It's primarily driven by local developers who try to sell off these badly built retail projects as soon as they can. In the car industry there are tons of protections and regulations written into state law regarding where new dealerships can ever be built in Utah. Why isn't retail doing a better job of making it harder to start new retail in the state?