Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoboy61
I know this has little to do with development, but this is certainly a distinction that Tempe does not need.
So apparently Tempe and Glendale are more dangerous than Compton, Inglewood, Santa Ana, and East St. Louis among others...
|
You have to take it all in context. Tempe actually has a very low murder rate and the assault rate is rather low as well; however, Tempe has a high property crime rate.
Here is a comparison:
Tempe's violent crime rate is 5.52 per 1,000 residents. Compton's is 12.42—that is more than twice as high as Tempe's rate and Compton's population is much smaller than Tempe's.
Tempe's property crime rate is 54.59 per 1,000 residents. Compton's is 24.47. So property crime is more that twice as high in Tempe compared to Compton.
Compton's murder rate is more than 3 times as high as the rate in Tempe. Likewise, rape and assault are higher in Compton compared to Tempe. So Tempe is being considered "dangerous" because its property crime rate is rather high. In other words, the label is misleading. The same is true of Glendale which actually has a murder rate of 0.05 (0.02 lower than Tempe's).
Sources:
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/az/tempe/crime/
and
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/compton/crime/
One reason for Tempe's and Glendale's higher property crime rate is the fact that there are more things of value to steal compared to other cities with high rates of poverty. With a huge daytime influx of non-residence (especially in Tempe), this is bound to happen. Cars will get stolen, houses will be broken into, bikes will disappear, backpacks will be lifted, etc...