HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2024, 3:24 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Even though CME has mentioned looking into moving their data centers to other states, their traders literally won't allow them to cause they still want the fractions of a second advantage by being located in Chicago. Location still matters even in the modern era

CME and Google to build new facility to move trading into the cloud

Quote:
Alphabet Inc.’s Google will work with CME Group Inc. to build a new cloud-computing network that will enable the exchange operator to shift its futures and options trading into the cloud.
....
The decision to keep the data center in the Chicago area comes after market makers and high-speed trading firms opposed a move elsewhere, according to people familiar with the matter. It highlights how difficult it would be for the exchange to move away from the region, which has seen a number of high-profile corporate departures in recent years including Ken Griffin’s Citadel, Boeing Co., and Caterpillar Inc.

Traders like to have infrastructure near or in the data center to ensure information travels faster, giving them a slim advantage over others that aren’t nearby. Building out infrastructure elsewhere would take time and result in costs for firms, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private. Talks between the exchange and traders included a potential move to Google data centers in Virginia and Ohio, the people said.

“We decided to build the new facility in Aurora to ensure minimal disruption for our clients,” CME’s Duffy said.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/fina...-trading-cloud
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 3:21 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
I didn't have that on my BINGO card but should have. It's comical but makes sense.

The thing is that if they moved data centers then all these companies would have to invest in data centers near there. Also not easy depending on requirements of those data centers (i.e. a firm may be required to modernize more to operate in some new DC costing them a lot of time and money). And today in Chicago area there companies already have their own advantage based on location. A company today that had an advantage could lose that advantage vs rivals if they were forced to go elsewhere.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 5:28 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
Let’s see:
- Boeing is a dumpster fire, and for the foreseeable future, no less
- Citadel is slowly being exposed for their fraudulent trading practices, and Kenny’s Florida mega mansion will be under water and uninsurable within the next decade or so
- Carepillar’s core intl business in the E and SE Asian markets is fairly stagnant

They probably would have been better off staying here (j/k)
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 6:21 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
All 3 companies still have offices in Chicago/the area. The media has completely bungled what these companies actually did. None of them closed their offices here like they claim
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2024, 10:20 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
All 3 companies still have offices in Chicago/the area. The media has completely bungled what these companies actually did. None of them closed their offices here like they claim
I should have clarified I meant headquarters (Deere being in IL outside of Chicago).
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 7:45 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Sad to see IL lost to CO on the quantum computing front, but it was only a $40.5 million dollar grant. This is less than 10% of what Pritzker put into his budget that was signed into law.

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/tech...icle1-headline

On the plus side, IL did receive $51 million in other grants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 9:00 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
Sad to see IL lost to CO on the quantum computing front, but it was only a $40.5 million dollar grant. This is less than 10% of what Pritzker put into his budget that was signed into law.

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/tech...icle1-headline

On the plus side, IL did receive $51 million in other grants.
Sucks, but not the end of the world. Do you know what the state may use that money for and what a state like CO might use theirs for? I imagine if it's infrastructure and the like then good thing IL earmarked some budget for it.

At the end of the day, if some major company like IBM comes in and builds a quantum facility in Illinois somewhere, I'll take that over the federal grant if there was a choice.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 10:04 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 861
It seems that, regardless of the federal grant, there is still a quantum campus in the works for either South Works or Lockport unless something has changed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2024, 10:13 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klippenstein View Post
It seems that, regardless of the federal grant, there is still a quantum campus in the works for either South Works or Lockport unless something has changed.
Yep, and there's nothing in that article suggesting IBM/Psi have moved away from IL after this decision. At least not yet....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 1:41 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Illinois lands federal partnership to further develop quantum projects
Quote:
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, will take residency on the state’s quantum campus to establish a program where quantum computing prototypes will be tested. The location of the campus is expected to be announced soon.

According to DARPA, the goal of the “Quantum Benchmarking Initaitive,” or QBI, will be to evaluate and test quantum computing claims and “separate hype from reality.”
....
Pritzker’s 2025 budget allocated $500 million in state investment to help fund quantum research and build a campus, with $300 million going toward the campus. DARPA plans to put out a request for proposals for quantum companies and said it will spend “up to $140 million.” The state plans to match that amount, with the pot of money coming from this year’s budget allocation.
....
Both the U.S. Steel South Works site in the South Chicago neighborhood and a former Texaco refinery in Lockport are being floated as potential sites for the campus. But the governor said no final decisions have been made. The location is being decided in partnership with quantum companies that plan to be part of the campus. Pritzker said he’s also seeking a “large enough space” that has access to quantum resources that already exist in northern Illinois.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/technol...pa-jb-pritzker
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 4:41 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Illinois lands federal partnership to further develop quantum projects

https://chicago.suntimes.com/technol...pa-jb-pritzker
HUGE news
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2024, 6:58 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
**MOD NOTE** No national politics, stay on topic please.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 1:16 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
This is a good win and IMO better than what Colorado won. Maybe because of the DARPA name attached to this.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 2:23 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
The next big piece of news I am watching for is if/when PsiQuantum decides to build their computing infrastructure here, and where exactly. Even if their HQ isn't here, coupling this with the efforts Pritzker is doing can really help establish Chicago as some sort of a tech hub outside the bigger ones in the country. Or at least, one can hope......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 12:23 AM
pullmanman pullmanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 108
Heard from a guy working at a land use law firm that a major obstacle to an unstated Quantum computing company (probably PsiQuantum) opening a Chicago campus is opposition from the local alderman because of gentrification concerns.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 1:08 AM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by pullmanman View Post
Heard from a guy working at a land use law firm that a major obstacle to an unstated Quantum computing company (probably PsiQuantum) opening a Chicago campus is opposition from the local alderman because of gentrification concerns.
That would be Mitchell (7th Ward) I'm guessing. So, he'd rather South Chicago just keep losing population? I don't understand this logic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 6:36 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by pullmanman View Post
Heard from a guy working at a land use law firm that a major obstacle to an unstated Quantum computing company (probably PsiQuantum) opening a Chicago campus is opposition from the local alderman because of gentrification concerns.
I have to imagine the powers that be won't let a single alderman get in the way of something like this........

It's worth remembering both Johnson and Pritzker are on board with all of this. I find it hard to believe an alderman will shut this down because of gentrification concerns. This isn't some random highrise proposal - It's a major investment into a hollowed out part of the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 12:29 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
I have to imagine the powers that be won't let a single alderman get in the way of something like this........

It's worth remembering both Johnson and Pritzker are on board with all of this. I find it hard to believe an alderman will shut this down because of gentrification concerns. This isn't some random highrise proposal - It's a major investment into a hollowed out part of the city.
Fine, let it be built near Lockport. That’ll learn them. In all seriousness, in an area of the country that desperately needs some sort of stability, even if it means a modest amount of gentrification, the worst thing you can do is piss away a once-in-lifetime opportunity like this.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 2:43 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Fine, let it be built near Lockport. That’ll learn them. In all seriousness, in an area of the country that desperately needs some sort of stability, even if it means a modest amount of gentrification, the worst thing you can do is piss away a once-in-lifetime opportunity like this.
Agreed.... It's like - You want your jurisdiction to continue to be a rotting shell of a former self laden with crime and poverty?.........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2024, 3:15 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,965
What do you want?

More investment and jobs and opportunity!!!

Okay, here you go.

NO! Not that kind of investment and jobs and opportunity.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.