HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 3:09 PM
Arrdeeharharharbour Arrdeeharharharbour is online now
Cap the Cut!
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,048
I'm not sure what's in the circled area. Is this the backyard of the Dal president's residence? It seems an ideal spot to land off peninsula Dal and Kings students. The Robie St. streetcar would alternatively be useful to on peninsula students. I imagine a Mumford station that could do both sets of students.

CapTheCut3 by A.J. Forsythe, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 3:23 PM
Arrdeeharharharbour Arrdeeharharharbour is online now
Cap the Cut!
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,048
The Mumford Transit Terminal has the potential to be the biggest transit hub on the peninsula. Here buses, streetcars and LRT could meet. This FGN along with HSC and adjacent school all ensure a certain amount of traffic.

CapTheCut4 by A.J. Forsythe, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 3:40 PM
Arrdeeharharharbour Arrdeeharharharbour is online now
Cap the Cut!
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,048
The ongoing Windmill Road Functional Plan (https://engagehalifax.ca/windmill-road) suggests that there will be 50k citizens living along the Windmill Rd. corridor at some point in our near future. Back when the fast ferry was more of certain thing it was obvious that Shannon Park would be an excellent location for a ferry terminal. It would also be an excellent location for an LRT station. Wright's Cove transit station would be about 800 metres away. Bussing to and throughout Burnside from this location would seem to be a good idea. Next likely stop would be the FGN of MMM. I wonder if a stand alone LRT bridge adjacent to a newly constructed MacKay would be cheaper?

CapTheCut5 by A.J. Forsythe, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 3:45 PM
Arrdeeharharharbour Arrdeeharharharbour is online now
Cap the Cut!
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
Every time I have thought about this thread, “cap the cut” kept playing in my mind. That would be a very catchy slogan if it were ever to become reality!
It is a bit catchy eh? But so is 'kill the cut'. lol. I wonder which would be more popular?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 5:28 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by ns_kid View Post
Mr. Chaulk’s book was on my year-end reading list. The title, Railroaded: The Untold History of Halifax's Rail Cut, is a bit misleading, in my estimation. Chaulk tells the story of the creation of the Halifax Ocean Terminals, a massive project that took years to complete (arguably, it has never been “completed”), cost probably a couple of billion in today’s dollars, displaced hundreds of people and changed the face of the city forever. The rail cut was an integral part, but only part, of the story. Together with the Explosion, the Ocean Terminals project was probably the most impactful event in the city’s history. While I’d quibble with the claim that its story is “untold,” there’s no doubt most Haligonians are unaware of its significance, even as they navigate around it on their daily commutes.

Chaulk clearly sympathizes with the “naysayers,” the vocal minority who spoke out against the project when it was announced in the fall of 1912. They included about a third of city council, some municipal officials, including city solicitor F.H. Bell, and the Liberal-aligned Morning Chronicle, whose editorial writers derided the project as “vandalism.” Chaulk opines that the creation of the Ocean Terminals led “to the disappearance of one of the most scenic parts of the peninsula. …We still cope with it today, and it has grown bigger and uglier over time.”

There’s no doubt, as the author documents, that Robert Borden’s Conservative government – Borden was also the MP for Halifax -- drove the project through without meaningful consultation with citizens or the city, that the expropriation process was unfair and that contractors gave little regard to trifles like safe blasting practices. But it is also clear that it was well supported by business and civic leaders, even as some of their own properties were threatened or devalued by the construction.

Chaulk doesn't offer a realistic alternative. Doing nothing was not an option. Sitting on the shore of one world’s greatest natural harbours, Halifax was stagnating in the early 20th century. The marine facilities were crowded into the narrow strip of shoreline between Cornwallis Street to the south and Richmond to the north, jammed together with the naval dockyard, major industry and rail works. A commission led by Frederick Cowie examined four possible alternatives. One involved relocating the naval dockyard, a non-starter with the feds and with the British Navy, which retained rights. Two schemes involved relocating the docks to the Dartmouth side, either at Tufts Cove or Eastern Passage. Both would be disruptive, considering the business was mostly on the Halifax side and moving people and goods across the harbour or around the basin would be inefficient and costly. The advantages of locating in the south end, nearer to the mouth of the harbour, are undeniable.

Chaulk documents the human cost of the development, identifying the 238 property owners who were compensated for the expropriation of their properties and naming the streets that disappeared or were truncated by the work. While many of the properties lost were modest working-class homes, a number were grand historic structures. Notable among these was the Oaklands estate, built by William Cunard, second son of the steamship mogul. The president of the Board of Trade swooped in to buy it from its then-owner for the princely sum of $1250. While contractors were attempting to move it on the night of Dec. 28, 1914, the building somehow caught fire and was destroyed. All that remains are the original estate gates and former gatehouse at 1124 Robie Street.


The lost Oaklands estate house. Source: Old black and white pictures of Halifax on Facebook

The book does shine light on one mystery that long perplexed me, the dead end of Robie Street’s grand south-end boulevard, and the abrupt termination at Jubilee Road of the Connaught Avenue boulevard. Chaulk reveals that the original plan had Connaught continuing along the broad curve of the rail cut until it intersected with Robie. Robie was to bridge the rail cut and join with Francklyn on the other side. Why the works were never completed is unclear, although it’s probably not unreasonable to suppose that toney residents of Marlborough Woods, Maplewood and area were unenthusiastic about having a major thoroughfare dump commuters into their neighbourhoods.


Excerpt of c 1930 map showing Connaught Avenue intersecting with Oxford Street and Robie Street. Missing is the proposed bridge between Robie and Francklyn Streets.
Source: Bob Chaulk, Railroaded: The untold story of Halifax's rail cut (Nimbus, 2025)

While the author gripes about the inconvenience of navigating the rail cut’s 15 bridges and the noise of passing trains, he gives little acknowledgement to the impact of the Ocean Terminals to Halifax and to the nation. It is impossible to overstate the importance of this infrastructure to Canada during World War II alone for the transport of goods, military materiel and people, including troops. That said, Chaulk’s book is well worth reading for anyone interested in the historical perspective on planning and development in Halifax.
Appreciate your insights. I look forward to reading the book when my library hold comes in.

My impression is that all large infrastructure projects will have some negatives attached to them, but in this case the positives have far outweighed the negatives. Additionally, some of the negatives could have been alleviated had the city gone a step further and finished those roads, along with, perhaps, a bridge over the arm to further connect the area. IMHO it could probably still happen, but we have become somewhat timid over the years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 5:29 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour View Post
It is a bit catchy eh? But so is 'kill the cut'. lol. I wonder which would be more popular?
I can’t imagine “kill the cut” at this point in time, so I’ll go with “cap”!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 7:19 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
Over the weekend I happened to watch a Steve Marsh tourist video about him and his partner visiting Bilbao, a beautiful city with about 370,000 permanent residents. The infrastructure and public amenities are mind-blowing for a city roughly the same size as ours.
I wonder what all the differences are creating this huge gap where one has a 48 station metro and Guggenheim while the other takes 10 years to debate widening a few blocks of Robie and put in a bus lane.

It feels to me like Halifax rarely has much leadership and as it's a large, growing municipality there are always many projects on the table. It does the bare minimum in each area, for example building a utilitarian sewage treatment plant downtown, or structuring the Cogswell development to maximize cost recovery rather than value. Unfortunately, for cultural institutions this means there are no Guggenheims to really attract visitors. The Ocean Terminals were a grand project and the city and country were so much smaller and more modest back then.

It's too bad Halifax didn't grow a bit more in that 1880-1930 period. Had that happened, perhaps some now-politically-challenging but useful pieces of infrastructure would have been built in that era, like an underground train tunnel connection and Northwest Arm bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 7:22 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour View Post
I'm not sure what's in the circled area. Is this the backyard of the Dal president's residence? It seems an ideal spot to land off peninsula Dal and Kings students. The Robie St. streetcar would alternatively be useful to on peninsula students. I imagine a Mumford station that could do both sets of students.

CapTheCut3 by A.J. Forsythe, on Flickr
In the late 70's early 80's there was a bus layover/turnaround on the south/east corner of Oxford/Coburg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 7:50 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
In the late 70's early 80's there was a bus layover/turnaround on the south/east corner of Oxford/Coburg
It was there for a long time, in the forecourt of what I think was a WWII-era federal building of some sort. It was really more like a semi-circular driveway along the front of the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2025, 8:49 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
It was there for a long time, in the forecourt of what I think was a WWII-era federal building of some sort. It was really more like a semi-circular driveway along the front of the building.
Correct, it was used by the Dal School of Social Work, as well as two nice old houses on the south west corner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2026, 3:41 PM
Summerville Summerville is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour View Post
The ongoing Windmill Road Functional Plan (https://engagehalifax.ca/windmill-road) suggests that there will be 50k citizens living along the Windmill Rd. corridor at some point in our near future. Back when the fast ferry was more of certain thing it was obvious that Shannon Park would be an excellent location for a ferry terminal. It would also be an excellent location for an LRT station. Wright's Cove transit station would be about 800 metres away. Bussing to and throughout Burnside from this location would seem to be a good idea. Next likely stop would be the FGN of MMM. I wonder if a stand alone LRT bridge adjacent to a newly constructed MacKay would be cheaper?

CapTheCut5 by A.J. Forsythe, on Flickr
The plan for the MacKay replacement is a cable stayed bridge. I really hope they design it to have trains in the structure under the road bed…two levels
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.