Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut
Nope, it's from the Yanks - much like how "Yank" comes from the Brits.
Hmm, the orca logo is popular enough for Seattle to steal it.
Fair point, but the teams that still use letters were there when the leagues were created. Unlike Vancouver, those logos have a century's worth of heritage and a couple of trophies behind them; our city goes out wearing the Millionaires jersey (or worse, that Johnny Canuck one), we just end up looking like the Blue Jackets.
Could be worse - take the Oakland Athletics or the Mighty Ducks... or the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly. We ever get a team name like that, the franchise'll evaporate faster than the Grizzlies.
|
Wow, had never seen that piece regarding the history of the term. Thanks for the link.
Nice find regarding the Seawolves (and it is a definite ripoff) but I wouldn't exactly call "Major League Rugby" a major sports league and I sure as heck wouldn't be looking to follow their business model in any way shape or form.
Regarding symbols for teams, there are tons of examples of teams who used letters or symbols for their logos who came in
way after their leagues started (like close to 100 years later), so that's not a problem.
There is over a century worth of hockey history in this city, with a large portion of it with a team having a letter or symbol as their logo. Its not like its some new sport here that needs all the help it can get to get over. The Millionaires jersey looks nothing like the BlueJackets, and any variation of colors and styles could be employed to give it a modern, unique look. Again, we're a mature hockey market with deep long history. Columbus does not.