HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3801  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2019, 12:18 AM
Galaxy's Avatar
Galaxy Galaxy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 474
It's stupid to not build the six-lane option with the extension pedestrian and bicycle paths from the beginning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3802  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2019, 5:34 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
It's stupid to not build the six-lane option with the extension pedestrian and bicycle paths from the beginning.
Stupid is as New West does.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3803  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 7:08 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 886
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3804  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 5:14 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 886
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3805  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 6:11 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,898
Oh god, that wording isn’t promising...

Phase One of the project will help alleviate congestion on both sides of the existing tunnel...

Phase Two will select a long term solution that will align with regional plans...

Translation, expect to see money wasted on slapping more bandaids onto the existing archaic interchanges and joke of a “bus system”

Meanwhile the city of Quebec is planning to build a 6km long highway tunnel with a full BRT system:

Quote:
Originally Posted by p_xavier View Post
The new highway tunnel for Québec city is now expected to have BRT stations built in for electric double articulated buses. Interesting approach to say the least.

__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3806  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 5:57 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,583
govTogetherBC

What is this engagement about?

The Ministry of Transportation is working with the Metro Vancouver Mayors’ Task Force, Indigenous groups, TransLink, local municipalities and key stakeholders to develop and evaluate crossing options and is planning for interim improvements as a first phase to help alleviate congestion on Highway 99.

The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure invites the public to attend an information session for the George Massey Crossing Project and Highway 99 improvements.

Communities, stakeholders and the public are invited to learn more about:

* Plans for the first stage of the crossing project, which will help alleviate congestion on either side of the existing tunnel; and
* Results of work to date and next steps for selecting a preferred long-term solution.

Ministry staff will be available to provide information and answer questions at the drop-in sessions scheduled for:

Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2020
4 -7 p.m.
Legacy Lounge, Richmond Olympic Oval
6111 River Road, Richmond, BC

Thursday, February 6
4 -7 p.m.
Pacific Ballroom, Coast Tsawwassen Inn Delta
1665 56 Street, Delta, BC

Online feedback form will be accepted until 4pm on February 26, 2020.

Information session materials are available in the document library.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3807  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 9:12 PM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 886
Duh it's the NDP pretending to care and making it sound like it's their own project . Should've just went with the liberals plan but we all know that would've made too much sense .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3808  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 10:42 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,470
I saw a story on the news and it sounds like an 8-lane bridge is also still an option, as they referenced tthe shorter environmental assessment period.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3809  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 10:56 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,898
Reading through the reports it is painfully obvious that they are making up any possible criteria to prop up the tunnel option.

The one that made me laugh out loud was citing that the tunnel offers cyclists and pedestrians a more comfortable experience because of protection from the elements!

First of all, as a pedestrian and cyclists nothing beats the view from the top of a major bridge. Golden Ears, Lion’s Gate, Alex Fraser, etc... all spectacular.

Second, the tunnel would only be a short segment of any such trip, so the rest of one’s ride or walk would still be in the elements.

And third, this has never been an important criteria before in our region, especially where it actually makes sense (canopies over shopping streets, proper underground transit connections, etc...)

No new information is really available, no info on any real work to be done on the remainder of the corridor besides some vague improvements, suggesting any work beyond the crossing itself will be minor, and the buses are still depicted on the shoulder lanes... ugh...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3810  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 1:14 AM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,493
Cycling routes along highways are terrible. I think they should exist, but they should stop fooling themselves thinking they are providing good cycling infrastructure. Riding along the Hwy 17 "bike route" is horrendous. (noise, pollution, danger, buffeting, debris . . . ) Bike routes through tunnels would be terrible options that cyclists would use only out of necessity. Bridges are by far the best for this: fresh air, structure that often acts to separate cyclists from traffic, and VIEWS that make the experience a positive. They should propose these routes as necessary, but it is a con job to promote them as a public benifit. They can't even understand the importance of sweeping bike lanes clean, instead they just paint symbols on shoulders and forget about them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3811  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2020, 1:31 AM
moosejaw moosejaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 481
San Diego has cycling routes along CA52 freeway just north of Mission Trails Park which is quite nice
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3812  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 10:51 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,470
New bridge still an option for George Massey Tunnel replacement

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/george-massey-tunnel-replacement-bridge
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3813  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 10:55 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
New bridge still an option for George Massey Tunnel replacement

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/george-massey-tunnel-replacement-bridge
I suppose cautious optimism is the way forward regarding this project?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3814  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 11:05 PM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I suppose cautious optimism is the way forward regarding this project?
1-2 years of public feedback, 3 years of environmental reviews, and 5 years of construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3815  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 11:25 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Stupid is as New West does.
Well put
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3816  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 11:32 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
New bridge still an option for George Massey Tunnel replacement

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/george-massey-tunnel-replacement-bridge
I do wonder if the deafening din of a tunnel and the impacts on pedestrians and cyclists has been fully mitigated by the tunnel proponents.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3817  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2020, 11:43 PM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Vancouver | BC | Canada
Posts: 2,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
Cycling routes along highways are terrible. I think they should exist, but they should stop fooling themselves thinking they are providing good cycling infrastructure. Riding along the Hwy 17 "bike route" is horrendous. (noise, pollution, danger, buffeting, debris . . . ) Bike routes through tunnels would be terrible options that cyclists would use only out of necessity. Bridges are by far the best for this: fresh air, structure that often acts to separate cyclists from traffic, and VIEWS that make the experience a positive. They should propose these routes as necessary, but it is a con job to promote them as a public benifit. They can't even understand the importance of sweeping bike lanes clean, instead they just paint symbols on shoulders and forget about them.
It’s great to see someone on this forum who has exact same thoughts when it comes to bike infrastructure. What would be a better (just better, not a proper one) solution for HWY 17 is at least to put some concrete separators like they did in Vancouver along SW Marine Dr. Those would make cyclists feel much safer and also keep bike lane cleaner from debris.
By the way I just went to Point Roberts WA from UBC this morning and had a thoughts how great would it be to be able to ride a bike all the way through, instead I must take a bus 601 or 620 to make it through the tunnel.

Untitled by Lexus, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3818  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 12:05 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
New bridge still an option for George Massey Tunnel replacement

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/george-massey-tunnel-replacement-bridge
Everyone here should post their comments to govTogetherBC (read the info in the Document Library first). The first page of the Feedback Form is a comment box for you to fill with whatever rants your heart desires (the second page is demographics).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3819  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 12:40 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexus View Post
It’s great to see someone on this forum who has exact same thoughts when it comes to bike infrastructure. What would be a better (just better, not a proper one) solution for HWY 17 is at least to put some concrete separators like they did in Vancouver along SW Marine Dr. Those would make cyclists feel much safer and also keep bike lane cleaner from debris.
By the way I just went to Point Roberts WA from UBC this morning and had a thoughts how great would it be to be able to ride a bike all the way through, instead I must take a bus 601 or 620 to make it through the tunnel.

Untitled by Lexus, on Flickr
HWY 17 is dangerous for bikers, I would stay away
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3820  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 4:41 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,966
this was on facebook, it looks weird


1043thebreeze/facebook
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.