HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3301  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2025, 1:54 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,002


__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3302  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2025, 2:13 PM
davidtexan's Avatar
davidtexan davidtexan is offline
David
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 129




I noticed the crown is different from the renderings; there's fewer concrete beams. Seems like we don't have any up-to-date accurate renderings of the tower available.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3303  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2025, 3:40 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidtexan View Post




I noticed the crown is different from the renderings; there's fewer concrete beams. Seems like we don't have any up-to-date accurate renderings of the tower available.
The amenity level between the offices and apartments also looks more squat than the renderings. What else to expect from the VE capital of the world

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3304  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 12:34 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,794
^^ Yep. We knew about the VE'd amenity level, but the crown has always been hard to tell exactly what the fk we'll be getting from the renders. I'm holding off judgement until it's done, but I don't like the sparse look with so few pillars. I'm a bit surprised with KPF on this...

I fear they may crap out on that angled wood slat looking ceiling that's inside and out of the crown as well.

Time will tell...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3305  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 1:23 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 597
I think that particular rendering has been outdated for awhile. You can tell how the second level of exposed beams differs as well. Additionally, that render has 32 residential floors, whereas the actual version only has 30 (which aligns with the elevation drawings).

I believe the render below is the closest to reality, and it makes me think that the final beams aren't structural and could possibly be included later.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3306  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 2:13 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,606
Waterline’s website appears more accurate than the previous 2 renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3307  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 9:47 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
The Waterline has officially topped out at 1,025' per this Community Impact article: https://communityimpact.com/austin/s...out-in-austin/

A 1,025' height is a new number, we now have multiple options to go with for the official height: 1,021', 1,022', 1,025', 1,031' & 1,034'. Regardless, 1,025' makes it the tallest tower in the South until the Miami Waldorf-Astoria is built.

I was invited to this topping out event. Had I attended, I would have asked for clarification on the hieght. But it's on me for not attending and ascertaining that info.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.

Last edited by The ATX; Jul 31, 2025 at 10:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3308  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 10:47 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,911
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The Waterline has officially topped out at 1,025' per this Community Impact article: https://communityimpact.com/austin/s...out-in-austin/

A 1,025' height is a new number, we now have multiple options to go with for the official height: 1,021', 1,022', 1,025', 1,031' & 1,034'. Regardless, 1,025' makes it the tallest tower in the South until the Miami Waldorf-Astoria is built.

I was invited to this topping out event. Had I attended, I would have asked for clarification on the hieght. But it's on me for not attending and ascertaining that info.
Maybe the last "beam" was laid at 1025'...but, obviously the roof structure is not complete which will add some height.

I'm still going with 1034' from the FAA filing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3309  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2025, 11:12 PM
davidtexan's Avatar
davidtexan davidtexan is offline
David
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post

I believe the render below is the closest to reality, and it makes me think that the final beams aren't structural and could possibly be included later.
That looks like an older render. You can tell by the orange trim on the residential section and the parking garage trim design.

Their official website shows three or four different versions of the tower, which is kinda confusing at this point.

The most accurate one I've found is on their official Facebook page. It lines up pretty well with a recent photo I took. It includes the two-level section between the office and residential parts, and the vents on the top office floor. That said, it’s not perfect. The number of concrete beams on the crown and the middle section is different, and it’s missing a few vents on the side.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3310  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 12:03 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,002
1,021/2’ and 1,031’ are numbers from The ATX’s calculation of the lowest point. Initially the FAA released a height of 1,025’, I believe Community Impact is going with that or just rounding off. Later a height of 1,034’ was listed—I used those same calculations to get 1,031’.

When the 1,021’ number came to be Towers posted an article using that height—from there it spread about online.

To extinguish some confusion I’ve revised the height and going with the most recent figure that was released by the FAA, 1,034’.
__________________
HAIF

Last edited by Urbannizer; Aug 1, 2025 at 12:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3311  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 4:48 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
1,021/2’ and 1,031’ are numbers from The ATX’s calculation of the lowest point. Initially the FAA released a height of 1,025’, I believe Community Impact is going with that or just rounding off. Later a height of 1,034’ was listed—I used those same calculations to get 1,031’.

When the 1,021’ number came to be Towers posted an article using that height—from there it spread about online.

To extinguish some confusion I’ve revised the height and going with the most recent figure that was released by the FAA, 1,034’.
And I updated Wikipedia's list of Austin's tallest buildings to show 1,034'. So it's official. LOL
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3312  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 1:55 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
And I updated Wikipedia's list of Austin's tallest buildings to show 1,034'. So it's official. LOL
Don't let that power go to your head...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3313  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 5:09 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,786
I watched a lot of videos of news outlets going to the event and they kept saying 1,025 feet /shrug/

Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
And I updated Wikipedia's list of Austin's tallest buildings to show 1,034'. So it's official. LOL
Speaking of, has anyone updated this Wikipedia page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Austin,_Texas
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3314  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 5:24 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
I watched a lot of videos of news outlets going to the event and they kept saying 1,025 feet /shrug/



Speaking of, has anyone updated this Wikipedia page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Austin,_Texas
That's the one I updated. The rest of the page is a bigger mess than I care to deal with - especially since someone else will come along and re-do it.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3315  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 6:14 PM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The Waterline has officially topped out at 1,025' per this Community Impact article: https://communityimpact.com/austin/s...out-in-austin/

A 1,025' height is a new number, we now have multiple options to go with for the official height: 1,021', 1,022', 1,025', 1,031' & 1,034'. Regardless, 1,025' makes it the tallest tower in the South until the Miami Waldorf-Astoria is built.

I was invited to this topping out event. Had I attended, I would have asked for clarification on the hieght. But it's on me for not attending and ascertaining that info.
Miami? Damn, that's embarrassing.

We need a taller supertall. Ideally 1,500+.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3316  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2025, 7:20 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
1,021/2’ and 1,031’ are numbers from The ATX’s calculation of the lowest point. Initially the FAA released a height of 1,025’, I believe Community Impact is going with that or just rounding off. Later a height of 1,034’ was listed—I used those same calculations to get 1,031’.

When the 1,021’ number came to be Towers posted an article using that height—from there it spread about online.

To extinguish some confusion I’ve revised the height and going with the most recent figure that was released by the FAA, 1,034’.

I noticed where you got 1031'. But, there is an entrance to the building about 3' lower than the lowest point you used (west side - closer to Cesar Chavez). That's where the 1034' comes into play (from that lowest entrance to highest pinnacle).

**A few feet here and there can make quite a difference in the world rankings of tallest buildings.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3317  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2025, 3:54 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,606
This has always been 1034’. I don’t understand the confusion. There are four points on the roof that all have different heights and FAA has had 1034’ the highest point forever. The lowest entrance is pretty clear on elevations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3318  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2025, 8:00 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,786


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3319  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2025, 8:14 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,610
an agent I know told me there will be a rooftop bar. Can anyone confirm?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3320  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2025, 8:23 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancore View Post
an agent I know told me there will be a rooftop bar. Can anyone confirm?
God I hope that's true. Even if it's stupid expensive, this tower should be open to the public in some form (up top). I'd take such pride living in a building that all admire and enjoy, just sayin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.