Quote:
Originally Posted by Tetsuo
Oh common, don't punish her for the "sins of her father" plus they kicked her out.
|
As someone who is very close with my brothers and family and whose wife is very close with her siblings and family, and who keeps close friends who have the same strong honorable bonds with their families I have to call you out on this. I think to try and use schematics and say she should be completely ignored and not considered to a extent a willing accessory and beneficiary that knew very well what was happening is a cop out. The onus should be on her to prove her innocence, such as say her father disowning her. But I am sure that is not the case. This was like often is the case a family operation, and she was the main beneficiary of it all as tends to be the case with children in these circumstances. Her father no matter what happens will sleep well at night knowing his offspring won. Don't for a second think she is innocent.
I agree that the development should not be helped by the city of Richmond while its under the current ownership and there should be a effort to force them to sell, preferably at a disadvantage so as to derive minimum profits from the sale. Might not be a bad law to pass to prevent municipal governments from dealing with developers who have ties to organzied crime or are under investigation. Not sure the logistics and I am sure it would not turn out as heavy handed as I would like but something along those lines.