Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Canadian English is basically US English with a few "u"s thrown in so we can herald ourselves as being distinctive. I don't get the idea of expressing national pride by saying 'leftenant', for example.
Some seem to treat the use of UK conventions as some kind of act of resistance against our US cultural overlord, but I don't see how one colonial master is any better than another in this regard. Apart from Canada-specific terms like bunnyhug, pogey and other quirky words like that, it's not like those customs and uses were invented here.
|
Okay, fair point but you see in many cases, what was once imposed by a former colonizer then becomes a point of cultural heritage generations after the fact.
An example could be like the West African country of Côte d'Ivoire preferring that and insisting on other countries formally calling it Côte d'Ivoire (a French name) and not Ivory Coast (an English name). That's taking a former colonizer's tongue as a source of pride but yet that's how it went. The same "how is switching one colonizer's language for another?" can be leveled against them here too, but it is what it is.
Or the Filipinos, ruled by Spain and then the Americans for a while, but using their Spanish influence (including Spanish surnames etc.) to distinguish themselves from other Asians as a point of pride. Their nation is named after King Philip of Spain. Again, why did the imperial overlords' culture become cherished symbols? Apparently, after some time, it just becomes culture and identity.
Or Hong Kongers, who are proud to be more British-oriented and westernized than their co-ethnics across the border from mainland China, even though Hong Kongers got that culture from being taken away from the mainland by their ancestors losing in a war (the Opium war) where the Brits fought for the right to sell opium to them and profit from getting them addicted to the drug. Again, former colonial masters' cultures are taken as a source of pride against their new overlords (mainland China) even though both were overlords who imposed their will on the populace undemocratically.
Or even, closer to home in North America, the African American vernacular English and African American culture which (although there are some west African influences that manage to survive) shares a lot with Southern US culture from old stock British Isles settlers. You can see and hear similarities that Black American culture got from white Southern culture, even if it was imposed on them. But many African Americans still take pride in these southern US influences (which they carried when they moved to other US regions like the Northeast or California etc.) like soul food influences from southern food etc.. Again, "why take pride in your past colonial overlords or plantation masters' culture?" can be asked with regards to these elements of Afro-American culture that came from whites but after a while, it still becomes part of their heritage that they don't want to give up.