Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc
Alberta cities have planned for years for our rights of way. In Calgary, the only lrt line that goes through a busy street is the downtown corridor which has been LRT exclusive (no cars allowed) since the beginning. The rest of the city has exclusive rights of way completely disconnected from the streets except at some intersections. Edmonton's new North line has one section through a residential area. I'm not sure of the hurdles that went through though.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTA
There has been pretty big opposition to the plans where the LRT runs down Stony Plain Road west of 142 St., exactly because it would take away driving lanes. So much so that the city is delaying the west portion of the line and starting with the SE portion sooner. To be fair, this street is a bottleneck in moving traffic from the west end into downtown and back, but what people forget is that the LRT itself will remove significant numbers of cars and buses from the street already.
|
Thanks to you both.
Aside from the Edmonton opposition to the line on Stony Plain, how much have LRT plans become political footballs?
Cost is the next big argument against the plans around here... "
we can't afford it", "
we shouldn't be spending all that money on a streetcar to benefit a few lower-city bus riders", "
we have other priorities", etc. I understand that thinking, but relatively few people realize there are other city-wide benefits, and I don't think that point is made strongly enough when the proposals are discussed. It will surely be a hot election issue at both the provincial and municipal levels.