HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2821  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 2:18 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,066
^ You mean like this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgarri4 View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2822  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 2:50 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago to London
Posts: 1,104
Sorry...let me clarify. I love the building massing, the setbacks, etc., the overall footprint. I guess I was just hoping that the mullions would be a little beefier, with a bit more impact, such as shown in the original, terra cotta clad design. Looking at the pictures, it seems like the glass has flattened the effect. I haven't seen it in person and won't be back to Chicago for months so I will sit here quietly and hope that it becomes a faceted jewel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2823  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 4:01 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamy-developer View Post
Saw this from Chicago YIMBY this morning of first rendering for the park across from this development.

Initial Details Revealed For DuSable Park In Streeterville
I think the design is great. It’s a nice little pocket park that is there to provide a little respite for residents and visitors alike, even bike trail users. A lot of people in the ChiYimby comments are complaining about it, but they’re mostly clueless idiots to begin with. I feel like there’s not much you can do with such an oddly located spot that at 3+ acres, isn’t even that large, (other than additional boat docks), so the design still works well.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2824  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 4:45 PM
Sprinklemoore Sprinklemoore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2025
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
I think the design is great. It’s a nice little pocket park that is there to provide a little respite for residents and visitors alike, even bike trail users. A lot of people in the ChiYimby comments are complaining about it, but they’re mostly clueless idiots to begin with. I feel like there’s not much you can do with such an oddly located spot that at 3+ acres, isn’t even that large, (other than additional boat docks), so the design still works well.
Wow, condescending much? There’s plenty you can do on such a small lot look at what San Francisco did with its Venus sculpture. I also think the park is quite nice and I think the landscaping is very pretty and I am aware of the budget crunch the state and the city are in. But I would definitely not call this destination-worthy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2825  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 4:46 PM
iguy iguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
^ You mean like this?
Honestly, yes; I do think that has a good bit more presence than 400 LSD, even from that angle.

And taller would be even better. One can dream lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2826  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 5:29 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 216
The main constraints of the park are the two connections to the lakefront trail flyover. I know from a firsthand source that a flashier design was proposed for this site, which had major logistical issues and looked super tacky. I've seen internal draft renderings-- it was immature and garish, and bird fatalities were predicted to be high.

This revised design is mostly just space for native plants, which is an excellent use for a leftover formerly-radioactive landfill cul-de-sac. It'll be similar in size to Bartelme Park, and probably won't get much tourist attention. Which is fine by me lol
__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2827  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 6:06 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
The main constraints of the park are the two connections to the lakefront trail flyover. I know from a firsthand source that a flashier design was proposed for this site, which had major logistical issues and looked super tacky. I've seen internal draft renderings-- it was immature and garish, and bird fatalities were predicted to be high.

This revised design is mostly just space for native plants, which is an excellent use for a leftover formerly-radioactive landfill cul-de-sac. It'll be similar in size to Bartelme Park, and probably won't get much tourist attention. Which is fine by me lol
It looks like a lovely place to watch Navy Pier fireworks in Summertime.

However, I think you are underestimating the tourist presence.

The North Bank of the Chicago River would be directly accessible from Navy Pier without leaving the water, and tourists wouldn't have to compete with bicycles on the most crowded part of the flyover.

I can envision thousands of tourist families with children and elderly using the park as an entrance/exit and rest point. Even though it doesn't have a major attraction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2828  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 7:04 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,888
My only gripe about DuSable Park (and 400 LSD) is no access along Ogden Slip. That waterfront path will be continuous from Fairbanks to the 400 N LSD site, but there will be no way to pass under LSD at that spot.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2829  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 7:44 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 216
It'll be possible to access the northern path along the Ogden Slip, but not the southern path. It's a pretty roundabout way though-- going from the park, up the stairs/ramp/bridge to the flyover, then north on the flyover a few paces, then down the curvy stairs, then west on the little path underneath LSD, onto the River East Art Center Promenade.

Wish they'd kept the planned connection to the southern Ogden path. But Reilly's gonna Reilly
__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2830  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2025, 8:11 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprinklemoore View Post
Wow, condescending much? There’s plenty you can do on such a small lot look at what San Francisco did with its Venus sculpture. I also think the park is quite nice and I think the landscaping is very pretty and I am aware of the budget crunch the state and the city are in. But I would definitely not call this destination-worthy.
You were not addressed personally, so not sure why you got offended.
This is not San Francisco, and what may work and look lovely there may not have the same impact here.
And the area is very much destination-worthy, considering not just proximity to Navy Pier, but also as a starting point for traversing the riverwalk, as well as being a major node along the lakefront.
It’s not a huge space, but still has a lot to offer, and I think the preliminary design by Ross Barney is a great start; they’ve proven to be great at designing public spaces, like the riverwalk, so I have hopes this park will be equally compelling.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2831  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2025, 4:59 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
look at us still talking
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,601
a few from today






__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood, in a modest town where honest people dwell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2832  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2025, 5:26 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,775
And a few from me...

04.26.25








__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2833  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2025, 4:20 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
It'll be possible to access the northern path along the Ogden Slip, but not the southern path. It's a pretty roundabout way though-- going from the park, up the stairs/ramp/bridge to the flyover, then north on the flyover a few paces, then down the curvy stairs, then west on the little path underneath LSD, onto the River East Art Center Promenade.

Wish they'd kept the planned connection to the southern Ogden path. But Reilly's gonna Reilly
Per the published site plan, it looks like 400 LSD will indeed have a connection to the southern Ogden Slip path, but it will immediately lead back to North Water St and will not extend past the tower and under LSD to DuSable Park. I know we have blamed the Esplanade NIMBYs but I'm not sure they are responsible for this particular lack of connection. It is Related who has chosen to privatize their section of Ogden Slip!

https://chicagoyimby.com/wp-content/uplo...0-N-Lake-Shore-Drive.-Drawing-by-SOM.jpg
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2834  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 6:03 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
It is Related who has chosen to privatize their section of Ogden Slip!
Perhaps, but most likely at the Ald.'s request in order to appease said NIMBYs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2835  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 9:18 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 216
From today-- it's getting pretty visible from Milton Lee Olive park!
Also it's cool how drastically the light angle affects how the glass looks. The exterior is super reflective blue, but when lit from within, it's almost completely transparent and green.



__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2836  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 10:00 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 603
ngl - I think One Bennet Park is looking great here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
From today-- it's getting pretty visible from Milton Lee Olive park!
Also it's cool how drastically the light angle affects how the glass looks. The exterior is super reflective blue, but when lit from within, it's almost completely transparent and green.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2837  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 11:22 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 216
^ oh yeah, this park is a really great angle for it! Looks even better when the lights come on:


Skyscraper fans sorta forget that 800-footers are still absolutely massive towers lol. The avg person probably can't tell the difference between them and supertalls, unless they're right next to each other. I'd take a well-designed 800-footer like 400 LSD / One Bennett / Legacy over a weird supertall any day.
__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2838  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 11:26 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,336
God, 474 Illinois and the parking is such a turd. ANYTHING that blocks more views of it from any angle is awesome in my book.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2839  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 11:32 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,163
^ haha no kidding glad we have a glass version of it next door too…
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2840  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 12:42 AM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 193
Very excited for this to go up!

I bike by there almost every day to get on the LFT. Obviously I wish it was taller, but we'll take it haha.

That last Parcel in LSE might be the one to make the biggest visual impact. We will see, as I haven't heard any updates on that one in a while.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:43 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.