Quote:
Originally Posted by logicbomb
Some of the things I've heard have been concerning. Stringent rules regarding allocation of workers, labourers taking constant time off, conflict with seniority and inefficient usage of labourers, etc...The NDP's 'Community Benefits Agreement' added all sorts of barriers to hiring including very weird DEI requirements and the requirement that 1/4 of workers be apprentices who are very green.
It has not gone over well with senior trades people who value efficiency as they've constantly been forced to work with inexperienced tradespersons and labourers.
|
The Community Benefits Agreements don't include any barriers to hiring most of the workers on the publicly funded projects they cover. They include targets for having 25% apprentices, and language about prioritising hiring of qualified indigenous and equity groups. The unions, and the contractor signed on to those in 2019. Anybody going to work on these projects should have known that there would be a higher proportion of apprentices than they might find on a typical work site. If they don't like helping train the future workforce, they should probably find work elsewhere - it's only a handful of projects that the targets apply to.
Apprentices aren't necessarily 'very green' - some will be quite experienced. That's the whole point of the target - increasing the skills base of the provincial workforce. Senior trades people were apprentices theselves years ago. No doubt some are less well equipped to help train the future workforce, but if we're going to continue to grow and upgrade our infrastructure it's better that we have a trained younger workforce to carry that out.