HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2015, 2:35 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual View Post
Local reporters are incredibly lazy when it comes to planning stories.
All media has become lazy in researching facts. News seems to be more about entertainment these days than actually relaying important facts to the public. IMHO, the internet-based "news" sites tend to be the worst *cough* MSN *cough*.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2015, 9:17 PM
Hali87 Hali87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual View Post
They file the appeal, because they want to drive up costs. They want to make every single development a battle. By challenging everything, they drive up the costs of development, for everyone, but mostly for parties considering developing property. This means they likely chill some proposals from ever getting built, due to tighter margins. They're in the business of stopping everything they can, even if the law or process is not on their side.
Who is "they" in this case?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 2:47 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hali87 View Post
Who is "they" in this case?
I'd say the "human scale" crowd, or any who claim requested variances from policies (i.e. guidelines) are "illegal".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 2:54 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,823
There kind of is a "they" when it comes to development appeals on the peninsula. Appeals are often led by the same people, plus a few locals. Beverly Miller has likely personally participated in a large percentage of appeals on the peninsula, for example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 3:17 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
All media has become lazy in researching facts. News seems to be more about entertainment these days than actually relaying important facts to the public. IMHO, the internet-based "news" sites tend to be the worst *cough* MSN *cough*.....
totally!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 3:18 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hali87 View Post
Who is "they" in this case?
Someone123 nailed this, above.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 3:30 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
There kind of is a "they" when it comes to development appeals on the peninsula. Appeals are often led by the same people, plus a few locals. Beverly Miller has likely personally participated in a large percentage of appeals on the peninsula, for example.
I still haven't been to a single municipal meeting on the peninsula that Bev Miller hasn't shown up to. She was at the University Avenue bike lane meeting earlier tonight. She even butted herself into a conversation I was having although she did apologize later. It's nice occasionally to go out to a Bedford meeting where the BANANA's don't congregate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 1:40 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
There kind of is a "they" when it comes to development appeals on the peninsula. Appeals are often led by the same people, plus a few locals. Beverly Miller has likely personally participated in a large percentage of appeals on the peninsula, for example.
Ms. Miller is named as one of the appellants in this case, along with Edelstein and others.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2015, 2:41 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,823
The appeal to the NSURB was rejected. There may be a third appeal to the NS Court of Appeal, but unless that happens this development can proceed.

Hopefully there is no third appeal. One major problem with Gottingen right now is simply that it doesn't have enough residents to support the number of storefronts on the street. Higher density buildings are needed for this part of town to live up to its potential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2015, 2:57 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The appeal to the NSURB was rejected. There may be a third appeal to the NS Court of Appeal, but unless that happens this development can proceed.

Hopefully there is no third appeal. One major problem with Gottingen right now is simply that it doesn't have enough residents to support the number of storefronts on the street. Higher density buildings are needed for this part of town to live up to its potential.
But, but, but... CHANGE IS BAD. APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2015, 1:19 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The appeal to the NSURB was rejected. There may be a third appeal to the NS Court of Appeal, but unless that happens this development can proceed.

Hopefully there is no third appeal. One major problem with Gottingen right now is simply that it doesn't have enough residents to support the number of storefronts on the street. Higher density buildings are needed for this part of town to live up to its potential.
It's interesting that when this proposal first came out there were a number of new buildings on Gottingen, but almost all of the first floor storefronts were empty; now they are mostly full, very nice to see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2015, 2:51 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
It's interesting that when this proposal first came out there were a number of new buildings on Gottingen, but almost all of the first floor storefronts were empty; now they are mostly full, very nice to see.
I think there's a bit of lag between new construction, people moving in, and then new businesses moving in and business itself actually picking up. We likely won't see the full impact of the projects under construction on Barrington for another 3-4 years, for example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2016, 2:17 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,823
The third appeal of this project was rejected. It sounds like the developer might be free to move forward with construction now. Not sure what the timeline is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2016, 3:40 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,375
Sounds like a step in the right direction. It'll be good to see something finally built on the old Misty Moon site...

http://www.metronews.ca/news/halifax/201...taff-and-regulars-of-misty-moon-bar.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2017, 9:40 PM
hokus83 hokus83 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 284
so are these projects dead now? Did the crazy bus stop lady that wanted to plant strawberries in the gravel lots win
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 11:57 AM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,416
No, the appeals were dismissed and they have permission to build.

These have actually been in AllNS in the past couple of days. They're looking for the city to waive a bunch of development fees + enter into some sort of tax abatement to help support the affordable housing component.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 4:45 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanWatson View Post
No, the appeals were dismissed and they have permission to build.

These have actually been in AllNS in the past couple of days. They're looking for the city to waive a bunch of development fees + enter into some sort of tax abatement to help support the affordable housing component.
Given the # of affordable housing units that are proposed, I hope that the city will assist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2017, 4:12 PM
hokus83 hokus83 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 284
Still nothing going on with these. Are you guys sure this one isn't dead
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2017, 12:04 PM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by hokus83 View Post
Still nothing going on with these. Are you guys sure this one isn't dead
These are Ross Cantwell, same guy as Velo Lofts across the street. Wouldn't be surprised if these were less of a focus until Velo nears completion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2017, 1:54 PM
planarchy's Avatar
planarchy planarchy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanWatson View Post
These are Ross Cantwell, same guy as Velo Lofts across the street. Wouldn't be surprised if these were less of a focus until Velo nears completion.
They have until June 2019 to start them under the existing DA unless they ask for an extension. Although its weird that the Centre Plan is proposing to match the heights as-of-right, which is higher than all surrounding lands. Meaning there is an incentive to discharge the DA, sell the land, and build as-of-right with 100% market.

This project is so screwy though. Housing Nova Scotia put up the money to puchase the land, in exchange for affordable units to be completed by sometime in 2011. The agreement was never updated to reflect a new timeline and the "affordable" rents contained in the agreement are higher than market rents in Ocean Towers.

It is difficult to know what is really going to happen on these sites....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:09 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.