Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid
I don't think anyone who works with people suffering from addictions feels supervised injection sites are a "solution" per se, but they do seem to alleviate some of the worst effects of their situation. To that regard I think this is a good step, but it's really only "a step".
|
Supervised consumption sites are generally seen as a harm reduction strategy, not a solution to a problem. The main idea is that those consuming hard drugs are going to do it regardless, but out on the streets they're at risk of other issues that cost society much more than operating the site and providing a safer place to do it.
Risks include:
to themselves with overdoses that aren't caught immediately, disease transmission from dirty needles (and subsequent healthcare cost), self-harm, accidents due to lack of awareness of their surroundings.
to society being vandalism, violence to others, DUIs etc...
and these sites will have medical staff that can also link these individuals to resources to better themselves if they are open to it. Sometimes it may just be the connection they need to start pulling themselves out of the hole they're in.
Harm reduction is like acknowledging your uncle Jim is an alcoholic and no one in the family can convince him to stop drinking, he will drink at Christmas whether sneakily or openly, but you take his car keys away and give him the guest room to sleep when he comes over so he can't drive away at the end of the night and kill someone. It doesn't solve uncle Jim's alcoholism, but it reduces the risk that comes with it.