HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 6:27 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
It is hard to tell from the website, but the plan is to basically have only 3+3 lanes past 200 Street and not to continue the 4+4 configuration? Am I also reading correctly that there is some "bus lane on the shoulder" type of crap past Mt Lehman, so no proper six lanes?
HOV in left most lane AND bus on [right] shoulder, if we don't count the bus on shoulder it's 3+3 plus a a fourth lane in select sections.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 6:43 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
The full PDF is really helpful read on this. The shoulder lanes seem to be 4 meters wide, which will be very handy, dare I say MOST handy, for regular car breakdowns and stalled trucks, so main traffic lanes won't get jammed up. This is a huge problem on the main section of the Highway 1 through Burnaby, the tiny shoulders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 7:39 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,946
An actual half decent project. The 264 interchange looks great and those shoulders bus lanes aren’t as pathetic as those on the 99.

Also nice to see the scope of the full project being expanded out to Chilliwack.

So overall it seems that the #1 will be a decent highway from the Cassiar Tunnel to Chilliwack.

Also happy that the climbing lanes have been retained.

Just too bad the 99 gets shortchanged so much.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 2:30 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Aren't we still losing a climbing lane in Phase 2? I thought the current EB climbing lane would be the third lane but has that been changed and a fourt lane will indeed be constructed as part of the current phase?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 5:57 PM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Vancouver | BC | Canada
Posts: 2,794
The biggest takeaway for me is:

Did you know?
The naming of an underpass or an overpass depends on
what the Highway does in relation to the local road.
UNDERPASS:
The Highway goes under the local road structure
OVERPASS :
The Highway structure goes over the local road structure
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2023, 6:34 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Aren't we still losing a climbing lane in Phase 2? I thought the current EB climbing lane would be the third lane but has that been changed and a fourt lane will indeed be constructed as part of the current phase?
I’m not sure if that was ever finalized, publicly at least. If I remember correctly the plan was always to end up with 4 lanes but to initially have 3 (converting one existing to HOV) so there isn’t a sudden drop from 4 to 2 before 264th. With construction of phases 2 and 3 so close together I’m guessing that they build the 4th lane from the start. We’ll need to see if that information is released when the contract goes to tender this year for the Phase 2 road widening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2023, 6:03 AM
teriyaki teriyaki is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 593
First I've seen of a diverging diamond interchange in BC. Will this be the first one constructed in this province?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2023, 6:25 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by teriyaki View Post
First I've seen of a diverging diamond interchange in BC. Will this be the first one constructed in this province?
From earlier on this page...
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
If built today it would be the fourth, though it will definitely be the first in BC. The others are in Calgary, Regina, and Niagara, ON.
It will be Canada's first diverging diamond with bike lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 2:01 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,151
Render of the 264th interchange. Infrastructure BC lists anticipated completion for 2028.


Image from Province of BC https://www.infrastructurebc.com/project...hway-1-264th-street-interchange-project/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 5:08 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Lane markings on the main highway sure are confusing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 5:37 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Render of the 264th interchange. Infrastructure BC lists anticipated completion for 2028.


Image from Province of BC https://www.infrastructurebc.com/project...hway-1-264th-street-interchange-project/

Nice looking render . Wonder if there's any plans at all to 4 lane highway 13 from the border to highway 1. It'd be nice to get that done as well as this project at the same time so they mesh together.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 6:32 PM
sweetnhappy sweetnhappy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Central Alberta, formerly BC Upper Fraser Valley
Posts: 95
Wow, I didn't even notice the flyover on-ramps until seeing the render. Guess it's good they got rid of highway 1 on-ramp left turns at the main intersections (except for buses at the north one).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 6:47 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,946
That’s a well designed interchange, good to see.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2023, 12:00 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Is there a rendering of just south of this image
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2023, 7:36 PM
waves's Avatar
waves waves is offline
waves
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Nice looking render . Wonder if there's any plans at all to 4 lane highway 13 from the border to highway 1. It'd be nice to get that done as well as this project at the same time so they mesh together.
36km of Freeway total from i5 to Hwy 1 and only 11km from Hwy 1 to the border. I wonder how much such a project would cost? Seems like such a small distance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2023, 10:42 PM
sweetnhappy sweetnhappy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Central Alberta, formerly BC Upper Fraser Valley
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by waves View Post
36km of Freeway total from i5 to Hwy 1 and only 11km from Hwy 1 to the border. I wonder how much such a project would cost? Seems like such a small distance.
It's more like 9.7 km from the current southern intersection (56 Ave and Hwy 13) to the already 4 lane'd portion at the curve (where 264th Street splits – the 264th Street Diversion). Not cheap either way, I would imagine.

But I would think upgrading to 4 lanes would be a higher priority for Hwy 11 in Abbotsford because that is a much shorter distance (~2.2 km from the McConnell Road intersection to the road split at 2nd Ave) and the Huntingdon–Sumas border crossing is open 24/7.

Not sure why mention of I-5 is relevant – if you're referring to the WA-539, it's only 4 lanes south of the Birch Bay Lynden Road/Kok Road intersection in Lynden (at least according to Google satellite view). So Washington would still have to 4 lane ~7.3 km of their own highway.

Last edited by sweetnhappy; Aug 14, 2023 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2023, 2:27 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Vancouver Sun's Vaughn Palmer: NDP ditch election promise on Hwy. 1 widening
Opinion: Party promised widening of clogged artery by 2026, but lately isn't offering any timelines
Published Aug 15, 2023


https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columni...ditch-election-promise-on-hwy-1-widening

VICTORIA — The New Democrats have backed away from their election promise to widen heavily congested Highway 1 from Langley into Abbotsford by 2026.

The revised plan, posted earlier this month, broke up the project into smaller pieces and abandoned the target of 2026 for completion of any part of it.

NDP cabinet minister Dan Coulter then told a reporter that a significant stretch of the widening project won’t be completed “until 2034-35.”

The minister’s admission — soon disavowed by his own ministry — provoked a backlash, including in his own Fraser Valley constituency.
...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2023, 4:13 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,711
I can't believe what a boondoggle this stretch of Hwy 1 has become. It's bizarre how one of the most important roads in the entire province has become this political hot potato. It should be a bipartisan issue, and priority number one for the province. Like, an 'all hands on deck' situation. Saying that a significant portion won't be complete until 2035 is embarrassing.

It's SEVERELY under built, and has become an economic burden. The road is shared between Fraser Valley commuters, transport trucks and tourists ie. people that can't use/don't have access to any sort of alternative transportation. It's jammed all of the time, and has thousands of cars sitting idle, spewing exhaust into the air. It's also dangerous to have so many cars packed along two lanes for the majority of its length in the valley. God help you if there's been an accident. You'll be stuck for an hour or more.

That stretch of road between Chilliwack and Langley was expanded in 1965. Just think about how ridiculous that is. The population has quadrupled since then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2023, 5:15 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
I can't believe what a boondoggle this stretch of Hwy 1 has become. It's bizarre how one of the most important roads in the entire province has become this political hot potato. It should be a bipartisan issue, and priority number one for the province. Like, an 'all hands on deck' situation. Saying that a significant portion won't be complete until 2035 is embarrassing.

It's SEVERELY under built, and has become an economic burden. The road is shared between Fraser Valley commuters, transport trucks and tourists ie. people that can't use/don't have access to any sort of alternative transportation. It's jammed all of the time, and has thousands of cars sitting idle, spewing exhaust into the air. It's also dangerous to have so many cars packed along two lanes for the majority of its length in the valley. God help you if there's been an accident. You'll be stuck for an hour or more.

That stretch of road between Chilliwack and Langley was expanded in 1965. Just think about how ridiculous that is. The population has quadrupled since then.
Every level of government has a hand in this project. The Liberals quietly deleted 10 km from the Port Mann project. So then you lose a few years while they try and find money. NDP start put then you have the rebuild cost of several un planned disasters related to flooding.

Then you add in the fact the RR has a rightaway that is in the middle of it. The NDP should have did a better job of tendering this project. Part are issues related to the CBA but others are just the times we are in
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2023, 5:56 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,711
^I agree. It's every level of government that failed this highway early on. It should have been twinned all the way to Abbotsford (at least) when they were rebuilding the Port Mann Bridge, but like so much in this province, it was scaled down, and now we're left with a really poor piece of infrastructure.

I just drove through the Hwy 1 gauntlet last Sunday, so I'm probably feeling a little extra testy after that predictably awful experience.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:47 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.