HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2021, 1:22 PM
UrbOttawa UrbOttawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
From Leiper Newsletter:

The Buil-Heritage Sub-Committee will consider an "application to alter and partially demolish St-Marc's Church on Elgin Street".

I was unable to find anything on DevApps.

Elgin is possibly the only main street that has not seen any condo development thus far, which is quite surprising. The new infrastructure and renewal might spark some interest.

For St-Marc, if they keep the main church on Elgin and only demolish the back-end, I'd be ok with that. Not sure if the church owns the parking lot, but a 6 storey residential building, 8 tops, could fit in well.

http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=8314&doctype=AGENDA

Elgin IMO has the best collection of commercial retail and residential buildings anywhere along Ottawa's main streets. I do not want 8-12 storey blocks marching down the street as we have seen elsewhere. The narrow nature of the RoW is another consideration.

Preserving the heritage street fronts 100% and replacing parking lots and 70s-2000s retail strips with 4-6 storey buildings would increase the density further but still preserve the unique human-scale.
The tower has been on the verge of collapse the past few months, so I don’t think this is a development related move (at least not yet). They’ve temporarily braced the tower but theres a very apparent vertical split running in the stones. It’d be a shame to see it go as it’s one of the oldest structures on the street, but it looks like they’ll be documenting each stone for a rebuild at some point
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2021, 6:59 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbOttawa View Post
The tower has been on the verge of collapse the past few months, so I don’t think this is a development related move (at least not yet). They’ve temporarily braced the tower but theres a very apparent vertical split running in the stones. It’d be a shame to see it go as it’s one of the oldest structures on the street, but it looks like they’ll be documenting each stone for a rebuild at some point
Thanks for the info.

Presentation on Église Uni St-Marc's starts at 1:45:16. Application is to dismantle the tower portion due to structural damage. Pretty much what you outlined.

Cracks were spotted in early 2020, bracing installed in November 2020, more cracks appeared in April 2020.

Although this sort of situation is always disappointing, it's good to see City of Ottawa staff and the church take quick action to prevent full collapse. When compared to Somerset House or Magee House where we've seen catastrophic failures followed by years of litigation and no action to repair/stabilize the structures properly, this is a relatively good outcome.

The plan is to eventually rebuild the tower, but the church does not have the financial means to do this at the moment.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2021, 10:56 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
65 Stewart St | 9m | 3f | Proposed

65 Stewart Street (alternatively know as Jarvis House) is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a Category 2 building (refer to Appendix 3) as well as under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as falling within the boundaries of the Sandy Hill West Conservation District. It was originally constructed in 1886 and is a 2-1/2 storey wood-framed house, with a front gable and constructed in the Queen Anne vernacular style. It includes two rear additions: one two storey and one one-storey. It is clad with a painted wooden clapboard, and includes decorative bargeboards, shouldered window trim, projecting bay window, and a projecting asymmetrical porch facing the street. It is set back on the lot, which provides green space on the street and “front garden” feel to the site.

The development proposal consists of a rear and side-yard addition that increases the footprint of the building. The existing building footprint is proposed to be expanded from 113m2 to 266m2 (increase of 153m2 or 135%). The proposed addition is a wood-framed, three storey structure with a flat roof and sloped roofs facing the street (south) and east facades.

The development proposal increases the unit count from 2 units to 12 units. The unit types vary, with bachelor, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom units included in the design.


Architect: Robertson Martin Architects


Development application:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D09-04-21-0023/details

Streetview:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@45.4263845,-...itch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192


Location:




Siteplan:




Renderings:















Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2021, 5:35 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
An icon's transformation from firehall to Better Business Bureau

By: Caroline Phillips, OBJ
Published: Sep 8, 2021 10:24am EDT




One of Hintonburg’s most beloved community landmarks, the former Parkdale Fire Station No. 11, is on the verge of being reinvented as flexible office, meeting and event space for the Better Business Bureau’s largest regional office in Canada.

The private nonprofit organization had been searching for a building that was both centrally located and filled with historic charm when it learned that the old firehall at 424 Parkdale Ave. was up for grabs. Its anchor tenant, The Urban Element culinary event studio, bid good bye to its home of 15 years last winter.

“I feel really fortunate that this space became available for us right at the time when we were looking,” said Jordan King, president and CEO of Better Business Bureau (BBB) Canada’s Northern Capital Regions and Quebec. “It’s just such a perfect fit.”

BBB is taking over the entire 4,800-square-foot, two-storey building. It has been around since 1924, back when fire engines were still pulled by horses (Ottawa’s last fire horse retired from the station by 1929. His name was Bob).

The heritage designated property boasts high ceilings, exposed brick walls, polished concrete flooring and such original fire hall features as a hose drying tower and a firefighter’s pole. The windows and double-bay doors are painted a cheerful bright red.

“This building has more character than we could ever inject into it,” said King. “It’s very iconic in the city, which is amazing. If you tell someone you’re at the firehall on Parkdale, they’re immediately, like, ‘I know that place!’ ”

The pièce de résistance is the high-end commercial kitchen on the main floor. “We will be able to host our own events,” said King while emphasizing how much he wants to foster neighbourhood inclusivity, whether that means bringing in local chefs or loaning the space out for special occasions in exchange, perhaps, for a donation to a local charity.

“We want it to be like a community hub.”

BBB plans to use the second floor, previously occupied by Plum Realty, as office and meeting rooms for employees and BBB members. They can come and go as they please, in keeping with current flexible workplace trends.

BBB is working with Ottawa-based design consultants Candice Wei and Mark Sanchez of Wei Sanchez Design Studio to give the interior a cool retro vibe that matches the nearly century-old architecture, with its red bricks with stone trim. The fire hall, which closed in 1986, is one of the last pre-1930 stations remaining in Ottawa.

The most significant change will involve bringing the hidden second bay into the ground floor space, to create more room and boost natural light.

If everything goes as planned, the building should be ready by the end of the year. Costs are projected to be in the range of $300,000, said King.

The landlord had listed with leasing agent Zinati Realty while BBB worked with Avison Young to close the deal.

BBB wasn’t the only interested party that had been eyeing the firehall. “We were very selective in who we wanted to put in there,” said property manager Jonah Bonn, founder of First Bay Properties, a boutique commercial property management firm with operations in Ottawa and Halifax. “There was no shortage of inquiries about the space, but we wanted to make sure we had a strong covenant and someone who has a track record and an ability to reinvigorate the space over the coming years.

“We think it will be a good use of the space and we look forward to them moving in, in short order.”

As for The Urban Element, Bonn said he was sorry to lose it as a tenant. Due to repeated lockdown restrictions, the well-regarded owners, Carley and Oliver Schelck, came up with a new business model that focused on prepared meals, virtual cooking classes and catering. “Certainly, it was upsetting to see them go,” said Bonn. “I think their departure was accelerated by the pandemic.”

BBB was founded in 1912 by business owners who were trying to stop marketplace practices that were deceptive, misleading or unethical. One of the main services provided by BBB is a free database of businesses that lists the services or products offered, the number of complaints filed against the business, and an assigned BBB rating. As well, BBB provides accreditation to reputable businesses engaging in fair business practices.

BBB can also assist in the resolution of disputes between a business and its customers.

The regional office, located on Hunt Club Road, has more than 50 employees and roughly 5,000 members.

In many ways, the organization and fire station No. 11 are similar, said BBB’s media relations officer, Jessie St-Cyr. “BBB has evolved so much over the years, much like this space, but you still have the main essence.”

[email protected]

http://www.obj.ca/article/local/icons-transformation-firehall-better-business-bureau
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 8:16 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Deschênes Rapid Ruins will receive a heritage designation from the City of Gatineau, but not heritage protection as that would burden the City into taking action. They prefer to stand back and watch Transport Quebec eventually demolish the 136 year old ruins, it seems. As the former head of Tourisme Outaouais, I would have expected more from the Mayor.



https://www.ledroit.com/2022/03/16/pas-d...schenes-4dbf116551251315cd70d36f272636fe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2022, 4:08 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Quote:
Kate Porter
@KatePorterCBC

Nussbaum also said the NCC had signed a new tenant for Moore Farm in #Gatineau, "Restaurant la commune".
There's to be a farm-to-table bistro, a Sunday market.
It will hold a doors open session this Saturday with its vision.
(BG on former lease at farm: https://cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/moore-farm-gatineau-co-op-bankrupt-1.4887852)



9:51 AM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/KatePorterCBC/status/1512065526872174592?cxt=HHwWgMCj5bvl9_spAAAA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2022, 5:00 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Deschênes Rapid Ruins will receive a heritage designation from the City of Gatineau, but not heritage protection as that would burden the City into taking action. They prefer to stand back and watch Transport Quebec eventually demolish the 136 year old ruins, it seems. As the former head of Tourisme Outaouais, I would have expected more from the Mayor.



https://www.ledroit.com/2022/03/16/pas-d...schenes-4dbf116551251315cd70d36f272636fe
I walked in that area yesterday and took a picture of the ruin from a distance. There are a lot of other ruins nearby and there is a special forest environment, where the most northerly wild population of Shagbark Hickory grows along the shores of the Ottawa River.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2022, 3:04 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
City moves in to repair Barrymore's frontage
Built more than 100 years ago, the former Imperial movie theatre is part of the Centretown Heritage Conservation District, a designation given in 1997.

Lynn Saxberg, Ottawa Citizen
Jun 10, 2022 • 5 hours ago • 2 minute read




Contractors hired by the City of Ottawa replaced two wood panels on the facade of Barrymore’s Music Hall this week after the landlord failed to comply with an order to conduct repairs on the property.

The old panels had been installed decades ago to cover broken windows on the upper half of the building at 323 Bank St., but the wood had eventually rotted. After a 2021 property inspection, they were deemed to pose a public safety hazard and were among the items that landlord Louis Antonakas was ordered to repair. Orders were issued for interior and exterior repairs.

Antonakas appealed those orders, but the Property Standards Licensing and Appeals Committee upheld them, paving the way for the city to “take necessary steps to address public health and safety issues identified at this heritage building,” said Roger Chapman, the city’s director of By-law and Regulatory Services.

Built more than 100 years ago, the former Imperial movie theatre is part of the Centretown Heritage Conservation District, a designation given in 1997.

Because the top half of the building is vacant, the city simply replaced the boards instead of re-installing windows. Chapman said the new panels complied with property standards bylaws, adding that no further repairs were scheduled at this time. “However, should a hazard present itself, action will be taken to remedy it,” he said.

As for the interior of the once-grand music venue, the list of deficiencies identified by the inspector ranged from the structural integrity of decorative gold mouldings to poorly maintained electrical components. The city currently has no plans to fix those items, again because that part of the building is vacant, Chapman said.

The property owner, Antonakas, will be invoiced for the cost of the repairs completed this week. His family has owned the property since the late 1970s.

The owner of the business, George Syriannis, who had been running Barrymore’s for more than a decade, is suing the landlord for lost income and other costs after Antonakas evicted Syriannis last fall.

The club has been closed to the public since the COVID-19 pandemic was declared in March 2020.

[email protected]

https://ottawacitizen.com/entertainment/city-moves-in-to-repair-barrymores-frontage
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2022, 8:30 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
When will the City learn...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2022, 2:44 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
Saving Aberdeen: How Lansdowne's jewel was rescued from the wrecking ball
It was a year-long drama 30 years ago, during which conservationists, councillors, bureaucrats and architects all took turns on the stage

Andrew Duffy, Ottawa Citizen
Jul 01, 2022 • 14 hours ago • 13 minute read




Today, it’s hard to imagine Lansdowne Park without the ethereal majesty of the silver-topped Aberdeen Pavilion and its gracefully curved roof.

But such was not always the case.

For two decades, beginning in the 1970s, the fate of the Victorian-era exhibition building — the last of its kind in Canada — was a hotly-debated question, one tied to the murky future of Lansdowne Park.

During that time, no fewer than 35 votes were taken at Ottawa city council on what should be done with the pavilion, alternatively deemed an expensive eyesore and a national treasure. Some considered the building an impractical waste of money; others insisted there was untold beauty — and value — beneath its battered exterior.

What everyone agreed upon was that the Aberdeen was in a desperate state.

Most of its windows were broken; its corrugated metal roof was tarnished and dull. The building itself was home mostly to pigeons whose guano slicked the floor; the roof was full of holes from people trying to shoot them. Plastic bags caught the leaking rainwater.

By the mid-80s, the pavilion had to be inspected before every public event. In 1986, it was condemned: the building was no longer safe for man or beast. Engineers said the roof was in danger of collapse.

Something had to be done.

An ambitious $80 million plan to remake Lansdowne Park and refurbish the pavilion was tabled at city hall, but failed to gain the requisite support. Instead, on Aug. 7, 1991, council voted to demolish the Aberdeen Pavilion, a national historic site.

“This is nothing more than a sponge that will absorb all of the money every council wants to put into it,” warned Coun. Jacquelin Holzman, who voted in favour of the motion.

Fern Graham, acting president of Heritage Ottawa, vowed to mount a renewed campaign to save the building after years of fighting for it: “We will not leave anything undone,” she said.

Saving the Aberdeen was a year-long drama during which conservationists, councillors, bureaucrats and architects all took turns upon the stage. It is a story of politics and persistence, fortuitous timing and strategic foot-dragging.

It is a story that Mayor Jim Watson now points to — exactly 30 years later — as among his finest hours in politics.

It is a story with a lesson.



The Aberdeen Pavilion was built in 1898 to enhance the Central Canada Exhibition, a showcase of the region’s agricultural bounty and its manufactured goods. The event was a highlight of the annual social calendar in Ottawa: residents flocked to Lansdowne by streetcar and canal paddleboat to enjoy food, games, prizes, rides, circus acts and modern marvels. (The electric light bulb was demonstrated in 1889.)

The popularity of the exhibition was such that it was in constant of new space, so the city invested the then princely sum of $75,000 in a new pavilion.

A promising local architect, Moses C. Edey, was hired to design it.

Born in Wyman, Quebec, in the Outaouais, Edey was the studious son of a lumberman. As a boy, he devoted himself to woodworking and drawing, and at the age of 21, he moved to Toronto to pursue his dream of becoming an architect.

Edey apprenticed at a Toronto firm and at another in Moravia, N.Y.: It was then the only way to learn the trade since architecture schools did not yet exist in Canada. In 1872, he moved to Ottawa, found a business partner, and opened a building and furniture company.

He studied architectural geometry and industrial design at the Ontario School of Art, and finally launched his own architectural firm at the age of 40. Based on Sparks Street, Edey quickly made a name for himself as a designer of homes, banks, schools and office buildings in Renfrew, Shawville, Pembroke and Ottawa.

The Aberdeen Pavilion was his largest commission. Drawing inspiration from the pavilions built for the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair, Edey used steel trusses, mounted on concrete pads and connected at the base by underground tensor rods, to construct the building’s skeleton; he then sheathed it in pressed metal cladding and a corrugated metal roof. The lightweight materials obviated the need for internal columns.

The result was that, inside, the pavilion offered a large, bright field of space — 94 metres long, 40 metres wide, and 22 metres high — without a column in sight.

Outside, the pavilion commanded attention. “Like the Chicago Fair building, it has superficial Renaissance ornament, corner pavilions, cupolas, a dome, and other fairground folly applied symmetrically to all four corners of its elevations,” Stan White, a Public Works Canada architect, once wrote of the Aberdeen. It was the kind of building, he said, “designed to stand alone in a park.”

The pavilion was put together with astonishing speed — in just two months — and was dedicated in September 1898 by its namesake, Lord Aberdeen, Canada’s seventh governor general.

Although some doubted whether the fine-boned structure could withstand Ottawa winters, the Aberdeen Pavilion won broad public acclaim, and earned Edey a series of important new commissions. He went on to design the downtown Garland Building, the Rideau Canoe Club, and the Daly Building, the city’s first department store.

The Daly Building, a designated heritage site, was the last of the three landmarks to fall. It was authorized for demolition by the National Capital Commission, amid a storm of controversy, in September 1991 — just one month after the Aberdeen Pavilion was voted out of existence.



Before its long decline into decrepitude, the Aberdeen Pavilion enjoyed an eclectic career as an exhibition hall, livestock showcase, hockey rink and military asset. Sometimes known as the Manufacturers’ Building, it accommodated everything from religious revivals to broomball tournaments.

It played host to history. In 1902, the Ottawa Hockey Club, also known as the Silver Seven, built a rink inside the pavilion after the team’s home rink, Dey’s Arena, was flattened in a windstorm. The team played some of its games there during the next three years, and in 1904, the Silver Seven hoisted the Stanley Cup inside the Aberdeen.

During the Boer War, Lord Strathcona’s Horse, a Canadian military regiment, used it for riding exercises before leaving for South Africa. In the First World War, the pavilion served as a recruiting centre for Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry, while in the Second World War, it was used for troop mobilization and basic training.

The pavilion resumed its role as an exhibit hall two years after the war’s end when the Central Canada Exhibition returned to Lansdowne. In 1972, the pavilion became home to the exhibition’s animal showcase, from which it earned the title of “Cattle Castle.”

One year later, the city took over the neglected pavilion from the exhibition, but its destiny was bundled up in the Gordian knot known as Lansdowne Park, the future of which was debated again and again and again.

In June 1983, the pavilion was designated as a national historic site. Ideas about what to do with it abounded: The Minto Skating Club proposed turning it into a central skating facility. Others called for it to be converted into a trade centre exhibition site, a flea market, a butterfly farm.

In 1987, then-mayor Jim Durrell recommended the pavilion be dismantled and stored until there was money to refurbish it. The building could then be moved to the Experimental Farm, he argued, which he called “the logical place for it.”

Writing in the Citizen in November 1990, columnist Claire Hoy encouraged politicians to “send in the bulldozers” and not spend millions fixing what he derided as an ugly barn. “It’s not worth it, not this tumbledown shack,” he said.

Months later, in 1991, an ambitious new plan to convert Lansdowne Park into a trade show complex was tabled at city hall; it included $10 million for renovations to the Aberdeen Pavilion.

But when council rejected the plan due to its exorbitant price tag, local politicians said it was the end of the line for the Cattle Castle, too.

They voted 10-6 to demolish the heritage building and rid themselves of the troublesome pavilion once and for all.

The Aberdeen Pavilion might never have had the chance to be saved if not for the epic foot-dragging of bureaucrat Dave O’Brien, the city’s chief administrative officer.

“His stalling saved it,” Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson says today.

O’Brien, a veteran administrator who had previously held the same position in Sudbury and Gloucester, waited months to act on council’s vote to demolish the pavilion.

He didn’t put the job out to tender. He wanted to allow time, O’Brien later admitted, for a non-profit group, Historic Ottawa Development Inc., to finalize a proposal to convert the pavilion into a farmers’ market. “I think it would be irresponsible to demolish the building immediately,” O’Brien said.

Coun. Jacquelin Holzman, running for mayor on a platform that promised to keep a lid on taxes, accused O’Brien of thwarting the will of council. “As far as I’m concerned, council has made a decision and council’s decision should be acted upon,” she said.

O’Brien ultimately apologized for overruling the city’s elected representatives. But his act of insubordination bought the Aberdeen a reprieve and gave Ottawa voters the chance to weigh in on the building’s death sentence during the November 1991 municipal election.

Voters sent 10 newcomers to city hall, including a fresh-faced Capital Ward councillor named Jim Watson, who had pledged to save the Aberdeen. He considered it an essential part of the city’s history.

“The question was how do we get money to do what we wanted to do,” remembers Watson, “because that was the big concern: that we were just putting good money after bad.”

He cast around for allies, and found one in Alta Vista councilor Peter Hume, a fellow rookie, and another in council veteran Joan O’Neill. Although she had voted in favour of demolition, O’Neill was open to a new approach on Aberdeen.

“I wanted to save the building — but economically,” remembers O’Neill.

O’Neill gave the two young councillors added credibility, and together the three hammered out a “no-frills” plan to save the pavilion by returning it to its original state, nothing more. No insulation, heating or cooling system. No skating rink or farmers’ market.

“No one gave us much hope of doing anything because everything had been tried,” says Watson.

But the triumvirate steadily collected allies. “He (Watson) believed you had to build a coalition,” Hume says. “He was and still is very good at that.” O’Neill said Watson did not act like a city hall novice: “He was very self-assured.”

In April 1992, the city’s community services committee endorsed the compromise plan, but it still faced two major hurdles.

First, there was the issue of financing. The $5.3 million compromise plan put together by Watson, Hume and O’Neill patched together funding: $2.8 million from the Central Canada Exhibition Association (CCEA), $1.7 million from federal and provincial governments; and $720,000 from money earmarked for the building’s demolition.

But the $2.8 million from the CCEA was not guaranteed. The money was being accumulated by the Ex, with the help of the city, to pay for its move from Lansdowne to a new location, and exhibition chairman Dwayne Acres, an Osgoode farmer, was disinclined to hand it over: “It’s money that is not theirs, it’s ours,” he told reporters.

The city offered to extend the Ex’s lease on Lansdowne Park, set to expire in 1993, if it agreed to help save the Aberdeen. But on May 6, 1992, the CCEA voted 17-16 against that idea.

Some believed the compromise plan was finished, but not Watson. He went to the Glebe Community Association in search of support for a new compromise. The association was anxious to see the Ex leave the neighbourhood, but it had also been vocal in its support of the pavilion.

What if saving the Aberdeen meant putting up with the Ex for another decade? Watson asked. The GCA said it could live with that idea.

Meanwhile, O’Neill, Watson and other councillors who sat on the CCEA lobbied the board to support the new plan, which would extend the Ex’s hold on Lansdowne for another decade at $1 a year. The councillors had also discovered that the Ex’s $2.8 million relocation fund would legally revert to the city if the exhibition had not moved by the end of 1993. It gave the city lobbyists a powerful trump card.

With no prospect of finding a new site before the looming deadline, the CCEA agreed to a modified deal.

With the financing in place, the compromise proposal went to city council for a final decision. On July 2, 1992 — exactly 30 years ago today — council voted 10-6 to rescue the Aberdeen Pavilion from oblivion. (As a bonus, it also saved the Horticulture Building from the wrecking ball.)

But there remained one significant question: Could anyone actually fix the dilapidated pavilion for $5.3 million?



Enter architect Julian Smith, a well-known expert in heritage conservation. He met with Watson.

“As soon as we met, we were on the same wavelength,” remembers Smith. “We were both interested in what is the most basic thing we can do to achieve a future for the building.”

Smith arranged to examine the condemned pavilion. He found the building oddly claustrophobic since a low, dropped ceiling had been added; any windows not broken were painted over.

Smith climbed above the temporary ceiling to get a look at the building’s gable roof, and was immediately concerned by sunshine streaming through the holes that pockmarked it.

“You could see these pinpoints of light all around,” remembers Smith, who was worried the holes were caused by rust. “I knew that if the whole building was rusting, it was at the end of its life: It’s all metal work. The city couldn’t possibly afford to do a reproduction of the Aberdeen.”

He found a ladder and climbed into the rafters only to discover the holes were perfectly round, and untouched by rust. (It turned out Ex workers scared the pigeons out of the building every year by taking shots at them.)

Smith was thrilled: “It was evidence,” he says, “that the galvanizing was really good.” At the time, galvanized steel was relatively new, and because there was no advanced process for applying the protective layer of zinc, the pavilion’s metal had been doused with a thick coating, which had protected it through decades of neglect. The building’s metal was still solid.

Further investigation showed the building’s concrete piers, upon which its steel trusses rested, had less than one-inch of variation across the length of the site. “That impressed me because Lansdowne was a bit of a marsh,” he says. The piers would not have to be replaced.

“I realized this is a building that was inherently structurally sound,” Smith remembers. “Most of the building was salvageable the way it was. I realized it could be brought back to life without huge expense…I knew that building would show its value if it was just given a chance.”

Watson says Smith played a critical role in saving Aberdeen: “He was really brilliant in trying to hold the whole thing together and make it affordable because the last thing we wanted was for this thing to go way overboard.”

Says Hume: “We knew at the time that if it wasn’t within the budget, we were lost.”

Smith’s restoration plan meant the construction bids ultimately came in below budget.

Late that year, renovations began. Construction crews wearing hazmat suits cleaned out a one-metre pile of pigeon guano from the pavilion’s dome. The building’s false ceiling was removed, thousands of broken panes of glass were replaced, new rafters put in place, and three layers of paint added.

Watson visited the site constantly. “I was obsessed with seeing the progress made on the site: It was like having a new house built,” he says. “I took a sense of pride: This was something that most people had written off; they said we’d never find a compromise.”

Governor General Ray Hnatyshyn presided over the ceremony to mark the pavilion’s official reopening on June 27, 1994.

The story of the Aberdeen Pavilion holds important lessons. Hume says it demonstrates that politicians need to look both to the past and the future when making decisions. “Municipal government work endures for generations so you have to have the vision to say, ‘Here’s what I think this could be,” he says.

O’Neill says the story speaks to the need for compromise in politics. Watson views it as evidence of the power of broad-based coalitions. “It worked out,” he says. “The building still stands.”

Indeed, more than 120 years after it was built, and exactly 30 years after it was saved, the Aberdeen Pavilion still reigns over Lansdowne Park: a shining beacon when the sun is high and a complex of shadows when its low. The building’s quicksilver beauty knows every time of day, and all seasons.

We are fortunate to still have it.


https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new...jewel-was-rescued-from-the-wrecking-ball
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2022, 2:02 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Good reminder that Watson wasn't always such a
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 5:17 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Quote:
Protection du patrimoine: Gatineau veut serrer la vis aux propriétaires récalcitrants

Mathieu Belanger, Le Droit
28 septembre 2022


La maison patrimoniale du 485, chemin d’Aylmer sera finalement démolie. Le propriétaire Richcraft qui la néglige depuis de nombreuses années n’a finalement pas donné d’autre choix au conseil local du patrimoine et au comité de démolition que d’approuver sa demande. Le bâtiment construit au début des années 1930 était devenu dangereux et irrécupérable.

C’est donc l’histoire qui se répète à Gatineau, mais cette fois on sent une irritation particulière de la part des élus. «On est pas mal tanné de jouer dans ce film-là», a lancé la mairesse, France Bélisle, lors de la séance du comité exécutif, mercredi matin.

Fort de l’appui unanime du comité exécutif, le président du comité de démolition et du comité consultatif d’urbanisme, Mario Aubé, a demandé à la direction de la Ville de produire une analyse des meilleures pratiques en matière de protection du patrimoine dans les villes de la province. L’objectif est de passer en revue les outils réglementaires à la disposition des municipalités et les façons optimales de les utiliser contre les propriétaires récalcitrants qui laissent pourrir des bâtiments patrimoniaux dans le but assumé de pouvoir les raser.

«On va évaluer les pouvoirs qu’on a et qu’on ne se sert peut-être pas, a expliqué M. Aubé. On verra ensuite s’il faut plus de ressources humaines et financières pour sévir ou pour éventuellement se rendre jusque devant les tribunaux. […] On va peut-être encore perdre des maisons patrimoniales, mais à un moment donné, il faut que l’hémorragie arrête. Je pense au magasin général centenaire, à Masson-Angers, dans lequel on laisse rentrer l’eau. Est-ce que ça va finir comme la gare de Masson qui s’est effondrée? Je n’en veux plus de ça. Il faut arrêter de vivre sans cesse le même film. Aujourd’hui, on arrête ça. C’est le point zéro. On va se donner les moyens d’agir pour qu’on arrête d’être toujours confrontés au même type de situation. […] Un avertissement, une petite tape sur les doigts, ce n’est visiblement pas suffisant. Je veux qu’on se donne plus de mordant.»

La direction de la Ville devrait être ne mesure de revenir devant les élus avec les informations demandées plus tard cet automne.

Maison allumette

Le conseil municipal sera par ailleurs confronté à plusieurs autres décisions quant à des demandes de démolitions d’immeubles ayant une valeur patrimoniale cet automne. Le cas de l’authentique petite maison allumette du 207, rue Notre-Dame, elle aussi visée par une demande de démolition, reviendra au conseil d’ici la fin du mois d’octobre.

M. Aubé n’a pas voulu se prononcer sur l’avenir de cette maison. Le Droit a révélé, la semaine dernière, que la contre-expertise exigée par la Ville de Gatineau vient à la même conclusion que le premier rapport déposé par le promoteur. Le bâtiment serait irrécupérable et devrait être démoli. Le promoteur propose toutefois de réaliser un pastiche de la maison et de l’intégrer au nouvel immeuble résidentiel qu’il projette à cet endroit. La nouvelle mouture du projet devra d’abord être analysée et approuvée par la Ville.
https://www.ledroit.com/2022/09/28/prote...itrants-dd516efe498f7d43a0ebb39d9e81e993
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2023, 2:29 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
Mad dash underway to protect heritage buildings by end of 2024
Committee voted to designate former Sandy Hill school — about 4,600 more to go

Joanne Chianello · CBC
Posted: Feb 15, 2023 4:00 AM EST | Last Updated: 5 hours ago




It didn't take long for a City of Ottawa committee to vote in favour of designating the exterior of a century-old apartment complex in Sandy Hill as a heritage building on Tuesday.

After all, the former École St-Pierre at 353 Friel St. was built in the Edwardian Classicist style in 1906 — with an addition in 1930 — was designed by a local architect and was the community's first French-language school.

The file checks many of the boxes needed for this sort of protection including age, design, and cultural and historical significance for the central neighbourhood that's one of the city's oldest.

But Tuesday's designation by the built heritage committee, which still needs approval by full city council and is subject to appeal, is just the beginning of a municipal mad dash to protect thousands of heritage buildings by the end of 2024.



Provincial legislation passed last November to speed up building more homes, known as Bill 23, gives Ontario municipalities until the end of 2024 to designate properties on their heritage registries.

If a building isn't designated by then, the building can't return to the heritage registry for another five years.

There are 4,600 properties on Ottawa's heritage registry that are identified as having some heritage interest, a list that council approved in 2019 and includes the former school on Friel Street.

"It's going to be massively difficult," said committee chair Coun. Rawlson King of the job facing the city's heritage staff over the next 22 months.

He said the Ontario government's changes to heritage rules have created "a very untenable situation."

Heritage staff are working on a report that is expected to come to council in the spring to more fully explain the potential consequences of Bill 23 on the city's heritage properties.

"I agree with community members, politically, who said that they see this as a gutting of the potential for heritage preservation and that gutting does not assist with the creation of new housing, ultimately, in the province," King told CBC.

Lesley Collins, the city's program manager for heritage planning, said staff and council will have to decide how to prioritize what buildings get designated heritage.

Staff will look at properties with a higher threat of being demolished because they are in the areas with increased development, or whether a building represents a type of architecture or history that needs protecting.

"One of the pieces we really wanted to look at is what stories are we telling," said Collins. "How do we highlight some of the more underrepresented stories that we haven't told through our current designations?

"Unfortunately, we're not going to be able to save everything that probably should be saved."

King said he fears the heritage department doesn't have enough resources for the enormous job of handling thousands of potential heritage sites over such a short period of time.

He is arguing for more heritage planners "to ensure that we really preserve our heritage in a wider way."

The draft budget currently calls for the city's heritage planning department's budget to shrink by $26,000 in 2023.

The planning budget, which includes the heritage department, is set to be debated on Wednesday. The full budget is going to council on March 1.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/he...s-status-ontario-deadline-2024-1.6747689
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2023, 2:50 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,577
I'm not sure why the city thinks that it has to work in isolation to do this. There are groups in this city that include many who would be willing to do - or have already done - a lot of the research on older properties. The city should simply be putting out a call for help. This would get citizens involved in their city, as well.

The same is true for other departments, too. Imagine if OC Transpo asked community associations to determine where the best bus routeing would run. The groups could do the polling of their members and return an aggregated answer.

When people are involved - truly involved, not the type of 'consulting' that is done now - they are much more willing to accept changes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2023, 8:05 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
I'm not sure why the city thinks that it has to work in isolation to do this. There are groups in this city that include many who would be willing to do - or have already done - a lot of the research on older properties. The city should simply be putting out a call for help. This would get citizens involved in their city, as well.

The same is true for other departments, too. Imagine if OC Transpo asked community associations to determine where the best bus routeing would run. The groups could do the polling of their members and return an aggregated answer.

When people are involved - truly involved, not the type of 'consulting' that is done now - they are much more willing to accept changes.
That would be a great approach. I'm sure Heritage Ottawa already has a lot of research it could provide the City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2023, 2:43 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,491
Why Gatineau council saved this home and what it could mean for others like it
'It's truly the history of everyone,' author says of la maison allumette

CBC News
Posted: Feb 20, 2023 4:00 AM EST | Last Updated: 6 hours ago




An author and historian says a style of house built in the 19th and early 20th centuries needs to be protected as part of the history of the Hull sector of Gatineau, Que.

Les maisons allumettes, or matchstick homes, housed working-class families employed at sawmills or match factories in the area.

"At the turn of the century pretty much all the population was working class except a very few privileged people," said author Kathleen Durocher, who believes the homes need to be protected.

"So it's truly the history of everyone."

One such home became the focus of Gatineau's city council last week when it voted to stop the demolition of the building to make way for a 10-storey, 159-unit apartment.

Gestion NDI Champlain Inc., the company behind the project, has said it will go to court for authorization to go through with the demolition.

A spokesperson for the company told Radio-Canada that because the case is before the courts, they won't comment.



Coun. Jocelyn Blondin voted against saving the property and said the building may be past saving because of how long it's been left to deteriorate.

At a special meeting of council earlier this month, the lawyer for Gestion NDI Champlain Inc. presented multiple reports that detailed the poor state of the building.

Éric Olivier listed a series of structural defects that would make it nearly impossible to renovate.

Coun. Steve Moran, who voted to protect the home, said the heritage value of the property has been underestimated and the arguments for demolition weren't strong enough.

He said this was just a first step in the process of protecting the home, something Claude Royer, president of the local residents association, agreed with.

At the council meeting earlier in February, Royer also said he thought the reports that were presented could be wrong — that the foundation could be in a better state than believed.

He also questioned the presence of rot and asbestos in the walls.

Durocher estimates there are about 100 of the homes, some of which were renovated over the past 50 years bringing mixed results.

"The quality of conservation and the renovation over times in the '70s, '80s and afterward are quite different from one house to [another]," she said.

"Some kept their charms from the past and the others were highly transformed over time."

Coun. Daniel Champagne, who voted to save the house at 207 rue de Notre-Dame-de-l'Île from demolition, also said he wants the city to look into regulations for heritage properties so they couldn't be left to deteriorate.

Durocher said she thought this was a good idea — a way of keeping the history of the area alive while moving into the future.

She said a plan for "neighbourhoods and to plan the city with a certain esthetic, certain perspective of how to conserve certain houses" could make them viable going into the future, allowing the buildings to be renovated to meet 21st-century needs.

This could also open up some money from government for the required work, Durocher said.

"To help people who own those houses, who rent those houses, to work with the right materials and the right perspective to keep them at least in spirit, looking like matchstick houses, yet not having to live in like 19th-century conditions."

Coun. Mario Aubé said he wants the city to create an inventory of all the matchstick homes and he also raised the idea of a tourist circuit to make the homes an attraction.

With files from Hallie Cotnam and Radio-Canada

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-hull-matchstick-homes-council-vote-1.6750690
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2023, 2:19 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Québec recommande à Gatineau d’arrêter de démolir des maisons allumettes

MATHIEU BÉLANGER
Le Droit, 27 février, 2023


Le gouvernement du Québec invite la Ville de Gatineau à mettre sur la glace toutes les demandes de démolition de maisons allumettes sur son territoire tant qu’elle n’aura pas en main une étude approfondie sur le sujet, a appris Le Droit.

La Ville a annoncé, en janvier dernier, qu’elle allait mener une étude sur les maisons allumettes afin d’être en mesure de mieux préciser leur valeur historique et patrimoniale et en savoir plus sur leur méthode de construction et les gens qui les ont habités à travers les années. Québec s’est engagé à financer la moitié de la facture.

Les conclusions de cette analyse devaient au départ être disponibles au printemps, mais le président du comité consultatif d’urbanisme (CCU), Mario Aubé, a affirmé, il y a deux semaines, que cet échéancier devait être reporté de plusieurs mois. Le travail de caractérisation des maisons allumettes ne débuterait finalement pas avant l’automne prochain.

Dans une lettre datée du 20 février dernier dont nous avons obtenu copie, la direction régionale du ministère de la Culture et des Communications (MCC) recommande formellement à la Ville «d’attendre les conclusions de ce rapport avant d’octroyer d’autres permis de démolition visant ce type de bâtiment [maisons allumettes]».

Le MCC n’entend toutefois pas s’opposer, entre-temps, à la démolition des maisons allumettes à l’angle des boulevards Maisonneuve et des Allumettières devant permettre la réalisation du projet résidentiel Îlot-de-la-Caserne de 300 unités de logement.

La directrice régionale du ministère, Anne-Marie Gendron avise toutefois le directeur du service de l’urbanisme et du développement durable (SUDD), Carl Beauchemin, que les maisons dont la Ville s’apprêterait à autoriser la démolition «permettent de maintenir un contexte significatif aux abords de la caserne [#3] citée en vertu de la Loi sur le patrimoine culturel».

Considérant cette information au dossier, le MCC rappelle à la Ville de Gatineau qu’elle peut «encore utiliser son pouvoir de citation afin de protéger les immeubles visés» par les demandes de démolition. Le ministère invite en outre la Ville à laisser émerger des «solutions alternatives» à la démolition des maisons actuellement visées.

https://www.ledroit.com/2023/02/27/quebe...umettes-04ba804dcde72ea1931d884a1bacbe61
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2023, 5:06 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Is Padolsky no longer no longer at Mercury Court?

Quote:
Ottawa's Mercury Court celebrates 100 years with major retrofit

Neil Sharma, Renx.ca
June 28, 2023


Ottawa’s 100-year-old Mercury Court building is looking to the future after undergoing extensive green retrofits which are saving water and energy, and reducing operating costs significantly.



“The building’s operating cost used to be $27 per square foot because the building was old and not energy efficient, but with the changes our operating cost has dropped down to $19.50 per square foot,” Bill Sioulas, director of real estate at Golpro Holdings, the building’s owner, told RENX.

“The typical operating cost for a building like this is $22 per square foot. We used to pay $13,000 a month on water and we dramatically reduced it down to $4,500," he continued, noting tenants are happy as the upgrades "saved them a lot of money.”

The building’s smart technology also adjusts air flows depending on how many people are in the room, earning Mercury Court a TOBY Award from the Building Owners and Managers Association.

“The preference for many tenants is being in a green environment when they select places to lease,” Sioulas said.

The history of Mercury Court

Mercury Court, located in Ottawa’s ByWard Market district, opened on May 23, 1923 as Larocque’s Department store, but by the 1930s the Great Depression moved the owner to sell the building to Joseph Hirsch Vineberg, who’d keep the building in the family for decades.

By the 1970s, Toth Realty Corporation took ownership of Mercury Court, which then counted the Royal Canadian Mounted Police among its tenants, and hired architect Barry Padolsky to revamp and retrofit the building, even adding the rooftop dome.

More renovations followed in the 1990s, including the addition of a weathervane.

In 2015, Golpro approached Toth to purchase Mercury Court and secured its purchase for $22 million.

It has since spent another $4 million on renovations. Today it is appraised at around $36 million, according to Sioulas, a 48-year real estate veteran.

“I saw the potential of this building, especially with the LRT opening across the street and around the corner,” Sioulas explained – Ottawa's east-west light rail transit system through the downtown opened in 2019.

“With the historical significance of ByWard Market itself, I looked at it with (Golpro Holdings’ owner) Goldie Singh and we bought the building."

A mix of tenants old and new

Mercury Court is tenanted by Rebel.com, a website domain company, mortgage financier ICI Capital, Econo Petroleum (also owned by Singh), and the Embassy of Sweden.

Boustan, a Lebanese fast food restaurant from Quebec, and Waterloo-headquartered Meltwich both selected Mercury Court as a staging ground for future franchises, while Lone Star Texas Grill, among others, has also set up shop in the retail component of the heritage building.

"We have a couple of vacant spots, like every other building in the market right now.”

The COVID-19 pandemic has been difficult on the ByWard Market area, but Mercury Court was resilient.

Sioulas said he immediately prepared a pandemic guide for all tenants so detailed that Tripadvisor, a former Mercury Court tenant, asked for permission to use it internally.

Mercury Court has two large elevators servicing its three floors that can fit upwards of 10 people each, which made social distancing simpler than it might have otherwise been.

Golpro also enlisted Zoono, which creates long-lasting antibacterial products that kill bacteria on skin and surfaces with 99.9 per cent efficacy, to disinfect Mercury Court every three months.

“We’re still using it,” Sioulas said. “They do the Q-Tip test on elevators and door handles and things like that. I even stocked up on UV lighting, which came in from Montreal, and we cleaned out what was left in the market.”

Tripadvisor eventually decided to leave the building – downsizing from leasing 9,000 square feet to 1,500 in another building – but that was the only significant loss. Sioulas said every other tenant renewed their lease.

Golpro owns other Ottawa heritage buildings

Golpro worked with each tenant individually to custom-design rent plans, a process Sioulas said went quite smoothly.

“We treat our tenants like we’re their real estate partner in their business and we work together,” he said. “So there’s a 99.9 per cent satisfaction rate with us being a landlord. The Swedish Embassy, which can be picky, was happy to renew.”

Golpro Holdings has carved a niche in acquiring heritage buildings in Ottawa. In addition to Mercury Court, the firm has another one at 207 Queen St. at the corner of Bank Street, as well as the 118-year-old Trafalgar building.

It has also entered the multiresidential sector with the purchase of a 55-unit building comprised of bachelor and one-bedroom units at 305 Metcalfe St.

Golpro also has a property at Clyde Avenue and Baseline Road (along a future bus rapid transit line, and adjacent to Ottawa's busy Merivale Road commercial corridor) for which it recently received zoning approval to build 28- and 18-storey towers.
https://renx.ca/ottawa-100-year-old-mercury-court-golpro-holdings-major-retrofit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2023, 9:36 PM
vtecyo vtecyo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
There are a few interesting photos on on the owner's website: https://golproholdings.com/mercury-court-historical-landmark/ and https://golproholdings.com/377-dalhousie/

Last edited by vtecyo; Jul 4, 2023 at 9:37 PM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 12:49 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,479
Article speaks to the City of Gatineau's ad hoc heritage rules. They slap heritage watch labels on a bunch of random buildings without having them on a proper heritage registry and true protection, but anytime somethign is proposed, developers face opposition. There are calls for the City to decide exactly what's heritage and what's not.

For example, and this is not in the article, it's just me, Quartier du Musée and Vieux Hull are two obvious area that need protection. Any church or religious building left. A few commercial buildings on Montcalm and Eddy. For the Maisons Allumettes, pick a few particularly well preserved blocks, but leave the rest up for development.

Quote:
La protection aléatoire du patrimoine doit cesser à Gatineau, insiste l’Office d’habitation de l’Outaouais

Mathieu Bélanger, Le Droit
26 juin 2023


L’Office d’habitation de l’Outaouais et son bras immobilier Habitations de l’Outaouais métropolitain (HOM) demandent à la Ville de Gatineau de rapidement préciser ce qui est patrimonial et ce qui ne l’est pas dans son centre-ville. Les ambiguïtés, les imprécisions et la protection parfois aléatoire provoquent de plus en plus de délais qui finissent par mettre des projets de logements sociaux en péril, note la porte-parole des deux organismes, Karina Osiecka.

«Notre but n’est pas de détruire le patrimoine, insiste cette dernière en entrevue avec Le Droit. On a cette sensibilité pour le patrimoine, ça fait partie de nos valeurs. Sauf que là, la Ville travaille avec un catalogue fait par quelqu’un qui s’est promené dans les rues de la Ville en 2008 et qui a identifié des immeubles qui pouvaient être intéressants. La grande majorité de ces immeubles n’ont aucune citation patrimoniale. Allons-nous devoir continuer de travailler longtemps comme ça, au cas par cas où la Ville va véritablement protéger ce qu’il y a à protéger et permettre de nouvelles constructions pour le reste?»

Mme Osiecka a en tête plusieurs dossiers où des délais et des obstacles imprévus sont venus mettre à risque des projets de logements sociaux dans le centre-ville. Le dernier en lice, le projet de Boless au 33, 35-39, rue Wright, un immeuble de six étages comprenant 62 logements sociaux qui doivent être cédé à HOM une fois terminé.

La démolition d’un vieil immeuble qui occupe actuellement le terrain a été adoptée par le comité sur les demandes de démolition (CDD) en mars. Des citoyens ont depuis porté la décision en appel devant le conseil. L’audience devait avoir lieu le 20 juin, mais pour des raisons purement administratives, elle a été reportée au 31 août.

«Nous, on se questionne beaucoup, note Mme Osiecka. On y voit un risque pour le montage financier du projet. Tout était planifié pour un début de construction à l’automne. Là, ça ne pourra pas aller avant le printemps. On craint que ces délais viennent nuire à l’acceptation du projet dans le cadre du nouvel appel de propositions du Programme habitation abordable Québec (PHAQ). Si la Société d’habitation du Québec (SHQ) commence à se poser des questions sur ces délais à Gatineau, que ce n’est plus assez clair pour eux, qu’il y a des risques que ça retarde encore, est-ce que le projet pourra obtenir le financement nécessaire? On ne le sait pas. L’opportunité est maintenant. SI on la rate à cause de ces délais, ça pourrait jouer sur la faisabilité du projet, voire carrément le mettre en péril.»

L’OHO et HOM souhaitent que Gatineau précise ses intentions en matière de protection du patrimoine rapidement pour éviter d’autres obstacles du genre à l’avenir. Mme Osiecka note que plusieurs immeubles que souhaiterait protéger la Ville sont en mauvais état. «Si on avait investi dans la protection du patrimoine du centre-ville, il y a 20 ou 30 ans, on ne serait pas dans la même situation aujourd’hui, rappelle-t-elle. Sans aide financière pour les protéger, on les a plutôt laissés dépérir, et là on tente de protéger des choses sans une vision claire de ce qui a de la valeur ou pas. C’est un véritable problème qui va finir par mettre en péril des projets nécessaires de logements sociaux.»
https://www.ledroit.com/actualites/actua...e-loutaouais-FJFMD5L66NEEPNKCJJA6XYWFLU/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.