HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 5:39 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,152
Interesting placement of the Skytrain station fully within the site. I would have thought the station would be along 8th Ave to serve both this site and the commercial district along 10th. From what I can see in the image below it'll approximately be located in line with 6th Ave, which could potentially allow for a mostly straight shot to the UBC trolley bus loop.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 5:46 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight View Post
Some additional details here, including something that will make the English Alphabet fans happy:
It was always ironic to me that when FN independently name things it seems like they try to appeal to a wide Canadian audience to embrace names in their language, but when local government names things for FNs we get the most obtuse examples with no compromises that everyone inevitably navigates around.

(To be fair, I have a feeling that streets probably legally need to have English alphabet names and it'll look a lot like Chinatown's "Columbia St 哥倫比亞街" or Punjabi Village's "Main Street ਮੇਨ ਸਟਰੀਟ")

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Interesting placement of the Skytrain station fully within the site. I would have thought the station would be along 8th Ave to serve both this site and the commercial district along 10th. From what I can see in the image below it'll approximately be located in line with 6th Ave, which could potentially allow for a mostly straight shot to the UBC trolley bus loop.
It's only a straight shot if they decide to tunnel all the way to UBC, otherwise the University Golf Course is still in the way.

Last edited by chowhou; Jun 16, 2023 at 6:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 6:24 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Interesting placement of the Skytrain station fully within the site. I would have thought the station would be along 8th Ave to serve both this site and the commercial district along 10th. From what I can see in the image below it'll approximately be located in line with 6th Ave, which could potentially allow for a mostly straight shot to the UBC trolley bus loop.
Probably makes more senses to focus it on the Senakw development and you sort of make it into a walkable Jericho Beach Skytrain station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 6:55 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,129
A lot of home owners in Jericho shit their Depends this morning.

Looks like they tried to preserve as much view as possible by placing the tall towers at the far west and east of the site. Overall, a perfect spot for 20 000 new residents, with a huge amount of park spaces, km’s of beaches, and 3 high streets in West 4th, West 10th, West Broadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 7:02 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
A lot of home owners in Jericho shit their Depends this morning.
Quote:
There are now plans for 13,000 units, (up from 9,000)
I love how the developers have doubled down by adding even more housing. I'd love to see this reaction happen more and more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 7:10 PM
svlt svlt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
A lot of home owners in Jericho shit their Depends this morning.
Many of whom won't be alive to see this completed anyway so there should be nothing for them to complain about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 7:45 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by svlt View Post
Many of whom won't be alive to see this completed anyway so there should be nothing for them to complain about.
Since when has that stopped them?

TBF I know some Millennial aged people who've moved to Kits in the last 5 years or so and they have become full on NIMBYs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 7:53 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
I love how the developers have doubled down by adding even more housing. I'd love to see this reaction happen more and more.
Did someone say MEGATOWERS at Safeway!?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 7:54 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Probably makes more senses to focus it on the Senakw development and you sort of make it into a walkable Jericho Beach Skytrain station.
No doubt the businesses in Point Grey Village would love to have a Skytrain stop close by (or at least logically they should) but the commercial and office space in Jericho (I assume you mean that and not Senakw) is an overwhelming draw compared to three blocks of retail. Never mind the residents in Jericho and the beach, which you mentioned.

Jericho beach is already incredibly popular, but this development will make it the most popular beach outside of DT once you add 20k+ residents and a Skytrain connection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
I love how the developers have doubled down by adding even more housing. I'd love to see this reaction happen more and more.
That directive came from the MST leadership:

Quote:
“Following the release of two conceptual site plan options in Fall 2021, MST leadership asked the project team to review whether ʔəy҆alməxʷ/Iy҆álmexw/Jericho Lands could provide additional housing and affordability, greater inclusivity and open spaces, additional employment and training opportunities, and a deeper recognition of the cultural importance of the site,” reads the rationale for the more ambitious project.
Music to my ears
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 8:07 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Why not just give it as a condominium reserve at this point (between all the MST parties) instead of still being technically being under Vancouver jurisdiction?

That would allow for a lot more development here, since TBH, Jericho Beach nearby means they don't need the extra parkspace on the site.

Is there someone insisting it remains under Vancouver jurisdiction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 8:10 PM
ecbin ecbin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 176
So the solution to the housing crisis involves returning more stolen land to the First Nations communities? Sounds like killing 2 birds with 1 stone here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 8:17 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight View Post
Build it (and launch UBCx ASAP)!

My only problem is the density of the eastern core will not be as well served by transit (600-700 metres away from the Skytrain station) but I guess an Alma station could remedy that.
TransLink tries to place parallel bus routes around 800m / 10 min walk apart so they don't cannibalize each others ridership. It's really not that far for someone to walk to a Skytrain station. Also the initial plans have stations at Macdonald, Alma and then Jericho. People aren't going to have to hike for hours to get to a Skytrain station.

Millennium Line UBC Extension

I like this at the bottom of the FAQ:
Quote:
Is SkyTrain proprietary technology?

SkyTrain is not proprietary to a specific manufacturer. There are multiple manufacturers with the ability to construct vehicles and components for TransLink’s SkyTrain system. Procurement for rail infrastructure and SkyTrain vehicles go through a competitive bidding process. This process would be similar for all types of transit technology.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2023, 11:58 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,464
Agreed that the placement of the station to the north of 8th Ave is probably to serve the Jercho Beach Park.
It would have to be at the SW corner of the site to serve the 10th and Sasamat commercial area, in which case the much denser eastern node would be poorly served.
So I guess this is a reasonable trade-off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 12:23 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,031
Too far east though, and it overlaps with Alma Station. Crown Crescent seems like an adequate compromise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 1:23 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
Why not just give it as a condominium reserve at this point (between all the MST parties) instead of still being technically being under Vancouver jurisdiction?

That would allow for a lot more development here, since TBH, Jericho Beach nearby means they don't need the extra parkspace on the site.

Is there someone insisting it remains under Vancouver jurisdiction?
That will happen if CoV tries to block or downsize it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 1:24 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,896
Looks like a great development!

My only question is, since it is on native land, can you actually “own” a unit in the same way one “owns” a unit in a tower in any other community, or all they all leases?

And yes, the second phase of the UBC Skytrain extension should commence ASAP, before the completion of phase one if possible.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 1:38 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
My only question is, since it is on native land, can you actually “own” a unit in the same way one “owns” a unit in a tower in any other community, or all they all leases?
It's privately owned by the three First Nations, not reserve, so they could sell units as freehold strata if they wished. They want to maintain ownership of the land so are choosing to sell units as leasehold strata.
Here are the two registered parcels:
https://www.bcassessment.ca/Property/Info/QTAwMDAwMDBZSw==
https://www.bcassessment.ca/Property/Info/RDAwMDFEWVJTSg==

They chose to purchase the land so as to not have to go through a long and expensive treaty process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 1:39 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Looks like a great development!

My only question is, since it is on native land, can you actually “own” a unit in the same way one “owns” a unit in a tower in any other community, or all they all leases?

And yes, the second phase of the UBC Skytrain extension should commence ASAP, before the completion of phase one if possible.
It's not 'native land' in the way that the Musqueam or Squamish Indian Reserves are native land. 52 acres is jointly owned by the Canada Lands Company and MST, which is a corporation equally owned by the three local first nations (who bought their share in 2014 for $237m), and the other 38 acres is owned solely by the MST, who bought it from the Provincial Governmment for $480m in 2016.

The purchase of the two Jericho parcels stems in large part from an Olympic legacy in which four area First Nations agreed to set aside their competing and overlapping claims in the Metro Vancouver area, and to work together.

They don't intend to sell the land, or property freehold. They say the Nations will own the land forever, so homeownership opportunities would be limited to leasehold tenure (owning the home but not the land).
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 2:16 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,896
I see, thanks for the explanations!

So what rights would a unit owner have and not have in this situation compared to other condo towers (because in those situations you don’t really own and “land” either)
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2023, 4:55 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I see, thanks for the explanations!

So what rights would a unit owner have and not have in this situation compared to other condo towers (because in those situations you don’t really own and “land” either)
I would assume the same as other leasehold projects on First Nations land. The Tsleil-Waututh First Nation have developed hundreds of units on the north shore. There's an explanation of how it works here. There are some leasehold ownership units in the West End, and also in False Creek South, where the City owns the land. As the lease end gets closer, resale values tend to go down, although if there's nothing wrong with the building the lease may just get extended.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.