HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8501  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 9:45 PM
papertowelroll papertowelroll is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
So how close are we getting to downtown being “full”, once all the current planned and proposed projects are done? Where the vast majority of lots are already developed in a manner where it’s unlikely any will be redeveloped again soon (ie no one is tearing down the Frost to rebuild it higher)
Perhaps we are close to running out of surface parking lots, but there are still a ton of lots with buildings that are only a few stories tall and another batch that are used only for parking garages. I have to think the vast majority of these aren't explained by CVC or historical designation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8502  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 10:19 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by papertowelroll View Post
Perhaps we are close to running out of surface parking lots, but there are still a ton of lots with buildings that are only a few stories tall and another batch that are used only for parking garages. I have to think the vast majority of these aren't explained by CVC or historical designation.
My favorite game has always been to identify DT blocks that can/might/should get redeveloped into something taller. Still a surprisingly long list.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8503  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 10:28 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
My favorite game has always been to identify DT blocks that can/might/should get redeveloped into something taller. Still a surprisingly long list.
Got a google map?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8504  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 10:53 PM
FrankLloydLeft FrankLloydLeft is online now
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by papertowelroll View Post
Perhaps we are close to running out of surface parking lots, but there are still a ton of lots with buildings that are only a few stories tall and another batch that are used only for parking garages. I have to think the vast majority of these aren't explained by CVC or historical designation.
This plus the eventual expansion of downtown to include south of the lake, and if we can dream it, west of Lamar.

Ideally the pressure from nimbys holding the areas between South Lamar, South First, and South Congress can find a release of density wash over either the industrial parks along Ben White, or even see some of the office parks along mopac south of the lake look into what they could get out of redeveloping/converting their lots to include residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8505  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 11:03 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTex View Post
The I-35 CVC will Have to be reevaluated once the freeway reconstruction is completed. The land owners will see to that. The Capitol will no longer be visible from many of the existing points along the highway. However, by then Austin my not be boom town any more.
I don't see why they would have to wait until the construction is completed. The CVC reevaluation should be started ASAP. At the very least, the city should already be looking at eliminating theirs. The relevant state CVCs will obviously take longer to get rid of though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8506  
Old Posted May 31, 2023, 5:44 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Got a google map?
Nope, I'm too lazy. But I work DT and spend a lot of time taking elaborate commuting routes so I can get a gander at what's going on. Definitely have some areas I have my eye on. A good number of them are freestanding parking garages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8507  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 3:00 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,738
Standard International unveils global growth plans

Quote:
Standard International has shared details of its upcoming growth plans, with fourteen new properties set to open over the next five years.

Following the debut of Standard hotels in the likes of London, the Maldives, Ibiza and Bangkok, the company is continuing to add to its global portfolio. The Standard is set to open in Melbourne in late 2023, and Singapore in early 2024, followed by new openings in Lisbon, Austin, Mexico, Brooklyn, Vancouver, Dublin, Vienna, Brussels, Khao Yai, Nashville and Pattaya.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8508  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 3:24 PM
randalls randalls is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
Awesome to see this. Used to love staying at two The Standard hotels in LA. Glad we’re getting one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8509  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 3:33 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Oooo good gossip! I haven’t heard about this yet… makes me wonder where it’ll end up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8510  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 4:06 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,952
I just realized that Austin-based Bunkhouse Group was acquired by The Standard and is now their "sister" hotel brand.

On somewhat of a side note, isn't there a student housing building going up in West Campus called The Standard?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8511  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 7:13 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
Why do they install their brand signage upside down?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8512  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 7:34 PM
davidberko davidberko is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone View Post
Why do they install their brand signage upside down?
Because that's the standard, duh!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8513  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 8:19 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone View Post
Why do they install their brand signage upside down?
Advertising to Australians.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8514  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2023, 11:54 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,150
I know Kevin remembers the Kwik Wash on Manchaca (I think?). Had the sign with Kwik Wash on top, and the same under it but upside down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8515  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 1:23 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,627
Sounds like quite a party. London, Maldives, Ibiza, and Bangkok.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8516  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 1:48 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Of the buildings that are proposed or UC, is there a hotel component that we don't know about? Trying to match the Standard to the pipeline if possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8517  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 8:02 PM
FrankLloydLeft FrankLloydLeft is online now
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
This is funny to see as a friend of mine close to Bunkhouse mentioned they feel they're losing cool points with Austin. So a Standard finally coming to town makes sense as something "fresh" from that group.

Honestly, they're not a bad brand, but for Austin, they sure do play it safe relative to what they could be doing to stand out. Even architecturally, the Magdalena ( their first non-Lambert/acquired property ala Carpenter) feels more profit-oriented than anything else. Multiple people have said it looks like an apartment building.

Hoping the standard brings something new to the city, especially if they build something new.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8518  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 8:41 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankLloydLeft View Post
This is funny to see as a friend of mine close to Bunkhouse mentioned they feel they're losing cool points with Austin. So a Standard finally coming to town makes sense as something "fresh" from that group.

Honestly, they're not a bad brand, but for Austin, they sure do play it safe relative to what they could be doing to stand out. Even architecturally, the Magdalena ( their first non-Lambert/acquired property ala Carpenter) feels more profit-oriented than anything else. Multiple people have said it looks like an apartment building.

Hoping the standard brings something new to the city, especially if they build something new.
That's funny. I've been thinking for a while that Bunkhouse properties are not only dated -- pushing kind of an elder millenial-vibe -- but also are certainly not the leading edge of Austin cool any more. In some ways it's not their fault -- Austin's really leapt forward into a new era without most folks grokking it. But the 2010s are clearly over. Bunkhouse helped with a lot of Austin mythmaking and style creation, but we're past that now in a big way, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8519  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 9:32 PM
FrankLloydLeft FrankLloydLeft is online now
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
That's funny. I've been thinking for a while that Bunkhouse properties are not only dated -- pushing kind of an elder millenial-vibe -- but also are certainly not the leading edge of Austin cool any more. In some ways it's not their fault -- Austin's really leapt forward into a new era without most folks grokking it. But the 2010s are clearly over. Bunkhouse helped with a lot of Austin mythmaking and style creation, but we're past that now in a big way, IMO.
Elder millennial for sure!

I think them pushing out or not keeping Liz Lambert was a mistake too. Either way, I think it's time for some of these bigger budgeted brands to start pushing the envelope again.

Otherwise, it'll set the stage for someone else to come in and outdo them. How do we recruit these tech bros to bankroll legit ideas and not another terrible dating app.

Would love to see the Classic Inn turned into a swanky, 70s adults only spot. Like clothing optional pool with wild parties open to the public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8520  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2023, 11:51 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankLloydLeft View Post
Elder millennial for sure!

I think them pushing out or not keeping Liz Lambert was a mistake too. Either way, I think it's time for some of these bigger budgeted brands to start pushing the envelope again.

Otherwise, it'll set the stage for someone else to come in and outdo them. How do we recruit these tech bros to bankroll legit ideas and not another terrible dating app.

Would love to see the Classic Inn turned into a swanky, 70s adults only spot. Like clothing optional pool with wild parties open to the public.
First thought I had was.... .yep... no more Liz. Sad. I believe it was her cashing out and moving on. But.... that was just hearsay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:42 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.