Quote:
Originally Posted by cairnstone
Didnt the COV have to sue to CP over the false creek Subsidized rentals. As it was required to be built by a certain date and was never started. and CP kept switching properties to keep extending the deal.
|
I'm not aware that Concord have ever been required by the City to provide subsidized rentals, or meet a specific time frame. The arrangement was that sites were reserved for non-market housing, and Concord had to sell them to the City at the historic value based on when rezoning was enacted.
Without other levels of government funding, those sites have sat for many years. When the City found a way of developing the non-market site at 601 Beach by adding a condo tower to pay for the non-market podium, Concord sued the City, but lost. That's the only court case I can remember related to False Creek rentals between Concord and the City, but others may have a better memory.