Quote:
Originally Posted by Frontst17
No the homeless situation isn’t that bad. What is bad is the drug abuse problem. People take the subway to panhandle where the tourists are then subway back to Kensington to buy. There’s never more than a handful of homeless people in that few square block area but I do see a number of people having some kind of breakdown or withdrawal. It’s not some hellish war zone people are making it out to be it just looks damn rough around there. Simple investment and addiction treatment (citywide) would go a long way. But ya know, been saying it for decades and we relied on PRIET to fix it.. ha… ha…
|
I suppose I should say pan-handling instead of just "homeless." Drug-addicts and homeless add the same "flavor" to the area though I understand completely that there are many different distinctions between the two groups. I think the methadone clinics don't help. I know some would accuse me of simply relocating a problem, but wouldn't locating those services closer to the ground zero of drug issue make more sense and reach more who need it?
At any rate, this is one of the preeminent tourist corridors arguably
anywhere. The city should be doing everything in their power to make that stretch the most impressive and inviting part of the city. I see these poor tourists from all over the place looking like they're walking through Kensington. And they should. It's really not that far off.
The amount of foot traffic has completely returned. It amazes me that that stretch has correctly been labeled as "where dreams go to die" with such potential. It's one of the wonders of the world that Market East has resisted good development the way it has.