Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe
Some transit agencies have A/B/C/etc routes that go different routes based on time of day. Maybe a route could be done like this for those few times. As far as a job, what is wrong with some part time jobs for this kind of service?
|
London really needs a major overhaul of it's routes, and I feel no one in the city or the LTC wants to touch it.
But it needs to be done. As of right now, the LTC routes IMO make absolutley no sense whatsoever. It's like they just kept adding on routes, and not making modificatons to other routes as they did so.
The way I see it should be done, is on a main grid system, with what I call the main high frequency buses, and then the connecting buses.
The main buses would all be mainly 60ft, and on the main corridors of London, IE Wellington, Wharncliffe etc. All on a high frequency of 5 or 10 minutes. There would be multiple spots for transit hubs, for transfers and such. Then you would have the connecting buses, 40ft buses, that would run on the side roads like Jalna Blvd, Kipps Lane, etc. These buses would mainly be used to get to a main bus route, and would run on a bit lower frequency, around 10 to 15 minutes. Once you get the routes made, add BRT, and the system would work far better and be more synced than it is now, not to mention make more sense.
I would also bring back bus route names on the bus LED displays. Like 20 Cherryhill and what not. I have no idea why London got rid of their names, I have yet to see any other city do this. TTC still has their route names, that's saying something.