HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1641  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2023, 5:48 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
There was a similar discussion on the Aaroads forum back in 2016; reworking that proposal, I'd suggest the following:
  • move the Trans Canada designation to the Coquihalla route between Hope and Kamloops;
  • rebrand the existing TCH as Highway 1A and market it as the TCH historical route, since those communities already took a hit from losing traffic to the Coquihalla;
  • Highway 5 would follow the existing 5A from Kamloops to Princeton;
  • Highway 8 would be extended to Peachland (replacing 97C);
  • clean up the names of 97C (Merritt-Ashcroft) and 97D (Logan Lake-new TCH), perhaps as 1B/1C(?)

This gives the TCH the freeway route instead of the slower Fraser Canyon, which would make sense given the work being done to upgrade the TCH further east. Highway 5 loses the direct connection to the Lower Mainland but still retains its role as a connection between all three major east-west routes (1/16/3). If desired, one could even consider renaming the entire route along 8/97C/33 as one highway to emphasize the connection between the Cariboo and Kootenay regions.
I contributed to that AARoads discussion back in the day, so I figured I'd repost it here with a few different ideas:

1. Targeted renumbering

Try to keep the renumbering to just moving the TCH to the Coquihalla; basically the same as mentioned about with a couple alternatives. I would argue that because BC 5 north of Kamloops is signed as the Yellowhead Hwy and part of an interprovincial corridor between the Lower Mainland and Edmonton, while BC 5A between Kamloops and Princeton is more of a local highway (provided other routes are operational), so it shouldn't revert back to #5 as they have different functions.
  • TCH 1 follows the Coquihalla Hwy
  • BC 1A follows the Fraser Canyon and is the TCH Historical Route
  • BC 8 follows BC 97C between Merritt and Peachland
  • Keep BC 5 north of Kamloops
  • BC 5A between Kamloops & Merritt becomes BC 1B (runs parallel to TCH 1)
  • BC 97C & BC 5A (Cache Creek-Merritt-Princeton) becomes a new number, BC 25 is available but it could be any unused number
  • BC97D becomes BC 25A

2. Larger scale Interior Renumbering

IMO, BC 97 artificially connects the US with Alaska as most people who want to travel directly from the Lower 48 to Alaska would not go through the Okanagan. BC routes were renumbered to #97 to adhere to the US route grid (Okanagan used to be BC 5; Cariboo used to be BC 2) and extend it to Alaska, but those travel patterns were superseded by the Interstates. Further to that, Northern BC should have a continuous number to the Lower Mainland.
  • Idea #1 with the following changes
  • TCH 1 & BC 97 between Hope & Dawson Creek become BC 7
  • BC 6 follows BC 97 (and TCH 1 concurrency) between Vernon & Cache Creek
  • BC 5A (Kamloops-Merritt) would be BC 1A
  • TCH Historical Route would follow the new BC 7 & BC 6 along the current TCH route.
  • BC 97 would follow BC 97A & 97B from Vernon to Salmon Arm - BC 97B could probably be easier widened to 4 lanes to TCH 1 (which in theory will also be expanded) than BC 97A between Grindrod & Sicamous
  • Create TCH 2 along the Alaska Hwy & Canamex Corridor, following AB 4/2/43 through Alberta and BC 2/97/YK-1 to Alaska

BC 7 could also have some minimal upgrades between Hope and Vancouver to allow for it to be a viable alternate east-west route.

3. Craziness

Not going to happen, but let's really dream big.
  • Idea #2 with the following changes
  • New bridge constructed at Boundary Road over the North Arm to BC 91, with Boundary Road either remaining a surface street or a tunnelled freeway. BC 99, BC 91, and Boundary Road between Peace Arch and TCH 1 become BC 5 (northern extension of I-5). Alternatively, BC 15 becomes BC 5 and TCH 1 is cosigned TCH 1/BC 5 between Surrey and Horseshoe Bay.
  • BC 99 north of Whistler is expanded to 4 lanes. BC 99, BC 97 between Horseshoe Bay and Dawson Creek become BC 5. If the previous TCH 2 idea doesn't fly, BC 5 could continue along the Alaska Highway.
  • BC 97 between the current BC 99 and Cache Creek becomes BC 5A.
  • BC 12 becomes BC 8 (extension of the BC 8 corridor) - BC 8 could be extended east from the Okanagan to the Kootenays.
  • YH 5 north of Kamloops could be renumbered to something else. Possibly BC 7 would follow the current TCH 1 between Hope and Kamloops, then continue north to Tête Jaune Cache.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1642  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2023, 7:04 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
I contributed to that AARoads discussion back in the day, so I figured I'd repost it here with a few different ideas:
Hey, thanks for this; in fact, I came across your specific suggestions on AARoads while researching a response to Craner's post. Sorry I missed the user name!


Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
1. Targeted renumbering

Try to keep the renumbering to just moving the TCH to the Coquihalla; basically the same as mentioned about with a couple alternatives. I would argue that because BC 5 north of Kamloops is signed as the Yellowhead Hwy and part of an interprovincial corridor between the Lower Mainland and Edmonton, while BC 5A between Kamloops and Princeton is more of a local highway (provided other routes are operational), so it shouldn't revert back to #5 as they have different functions.
  • TCH 1 follows the Coquihalla Hwy
  • BC 1A follows the Fraser Canyon and is the TCH Historical Route
  • BC 8 follows BC 97C between Merritt and Peachland
  • Keep BC 5 north of Kamloops
  • BC 5A between Kamloops & Merritt becomes BC 1B (runs parallel to TCH 1)
  • BC 97C & BC 5A (Cache Creek-Merritt-Princeton) becomes a new number, BC 25 is available but it could be any unused number
  • BC97D becomes BC 25A
Good point about Highway 5, although I still think one can make the argument for retaining the connection to Highway 3. Perhaps an alternative would be to have BC 5 co-signed with the new TCH 1 between Kamloops and Merritt and then BC 5 would continue to Princeton. BC 5A would become BC 1B as you suggested.

Any thoughts on connecting the extended BC 8 with BC 33 as one number, co-signed with BC 97 through Kelowna?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1643  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 3:15 AM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
Hey, thanks for this; in fact, I came across your specific suggestions on AARoads while researching a response to Craner's post. Sorry I missed the user name!
Haha...no worries. I use a different username on AARoads.

Quote:
Good point about Highway 5, although I still think one can make the argument for retaining the connection to Highway 3. Perhaps an alternative would be to have BC 5 co-signed with the new TCH 1 between Kamloops and Merritt and then BC 5 would continue to Princeton. BC 5A would become BC 1B as you suggested.

Any thoughts on connecting the extended BC 8 with BC 33 as one number, co-signed with BC 97 through Kelowna?
Admittedly I've never taken BC 33, so I'm not too sure. My first thought would be if a more direct connection to the Kootenays were constructed (either 2 or 4 lanes), it should be BC 8; however, since most of BC 33 is north-south, maybe it should stay as BC 33. What's the time difference between BC 33 & BC 97 from the Crowsnest to Kelowna?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1644  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 4:02 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
Haha...no worries. I use a different username on AARoads.
Is there another "dmuzica" on AAR? The name on the post I read is spelled the same as yours.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1645  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2023, 6:00 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
Is there another "dmuzica" on AAR? The name on the post I read is spelled the same as yours.
My mistake, I do use "dmuzika" for AARoads as well. Some other boards use a different name. I didn't double-check before posting. I used to use MuzikMachine on boards like Canroads back in the day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1646  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2023, 10:31 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
....I used to use MuzikMachine on boards like Canroads back in the day.
Any other forums you can recommend for the infrastructurally intrigued? I primarily post here, but it is always nice to have additional sources; I'm aware of CPTDB, West Coast Ferries, and now AARoads but would welcome more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1647  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2023, 6:44 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,185
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1648  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2023, 9:22 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
Haha...no worries. I use a different username on AARoads.



Admittedly I've never taken BC 33, so I'm not too sure. My first thought would be if a more direct connection to the Kootenays were constructed (either 2 or 4 lanes), it should be BC 8; however, since most of BC 33 is north-south, maybe it should stay as BC 33. What's the time difference between BC 33 & BC 97 from the Crowsnest to Kelowna?
Castlegar to Kelowna via 33 is 3.5 hours
Castlegar to Kelowna via 97 is 4 hours
Castlegar to Osoyoos via 97 is 2.5 hours
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1649  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2023, 11:29 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,185
The Hwy 4 Kennedy Hill project seems to be near completion.


Lines Painted on Kennedy Hill - BC Highway 4 by B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1650  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2023, 4:16 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
How come no rumble strips.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1651  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2023, 6:01 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,830
That looks so much better than before.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1652  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2023, 8:11 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1653  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2023, 7:09 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
How come no rumble strips.
Good question.
No reason not to have them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1654  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 7:09 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,310
So at no point along the kicking horse canyon project will there be 2 separate viaducts side by side, 1 for each direction. So strange how everywhere else in the world builds to that standard. But it’s BC so there will be excuses about cost…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1655  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 7:10 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
So at no point along the kicking horse canyon project will there be 2 separate viaducts side by side, 1 for each direction. So strange how everywhere else in the world builds to that standard. But it’s BC so there will be excuses about cost…
Your really stretching for a complaint on this one, aren’t you?
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1656  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 8:02 AM
Vantage's Avatar
Vantage Vantage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
So at no point along the kicking horse canyon project will there be 2 separate viaducts side by side, 1 for each direction. So strange how everywhere else in the world builds to that standard. But it’s BC so there will be excuses about cost…
Why does it matter?
__________________
Vancouver born and raised | My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1657  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 8:42 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
So at no point along the kicking horse canyon project will there be 2 separate viaducts side by side, 1 for each direction. So strange how everywhere else in the world builds to that standard. But it’s BC so there will be excuses about cost…
Who cares?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1658  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2023, 12:49 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,997
So does anyone have any info on the Highway one 4 lane expansion projects for Selkirk Mountain and Jumping Creek?

They are not on the BC transport projects website but are listed here as going to Procurement this summer...

https://www.infrastructurebc.com/wp2/wp-...-Spring-2023-Major-Projects-Brochure.pdf

Also of note, not a single project in the Okanagan is listed here...

The BC NDP really do hate the Okanagan it seems.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1659  
Old Posted May 1, 2023, 5:26 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,406
^Hmmm - I see what you mean - but they are listed in the “Not yet Approved” section.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1660  
Old Posted May 6, 2023, 12:58 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,682
I've been wondering about this now that I've tried to self-learn rock mechanics for a while.
The rock cut in question is here: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.2795705,...xZ1XIHz3_5Tcw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e4
It's a 90 m deep cut in the sedimentary rocks on both sides.
My question: How is it that there hasn't been major rock falls through there since 2007?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.