HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7621  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 9:40 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,044
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7622  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 9:44 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Ouch. It is amazing that there is a market for the kind of nonsense being peddled by Smith. I guess as usual Canada is following the US in lockstep, just a few years behind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7623  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 9:51 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Ouch. It is amazing that there is a market for the kind of nonsense being peddled by Smith. I guess as usual Canada is following the US in lockstep, just a few years behind.
It's the rural areas and smaller cities and towns that are her base. The fact that the majority who live in Calgary and Edmonton can be completely dismissed by her is what's so fucked up. UCP will win my riding but could lose the rest of the city. Though Abacus just had a poll showing them with a 6% lead in Calgary before the deal was announced. Mind you 19% of respondents were still undecided. This plan is so transparent and so stupid, I fear it might work. A lot of undecided voters get swayed by stupid shit like this. Depends if it pisses enough people off or you have the diehard Flames fans who turn a blind eye to the corporate welfare and want a shiny new box.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7624  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 10:19 PM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Still chuckling at the comparison that McMahon is Fenway. Fenway has charm and character, MCMahon is just old.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7625  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 10:21 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Mcmahon is the Wilfred Brimley of stadiums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7626  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 10:23 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Mcmahon is the Wilfred Brimley of stadiums


That actually made me laugh out loud! Thanks!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7627  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:16 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
As you alluded to, it's all about keeping the entertainment district of Lansdowne busy. The City is jumping through hoops to accommodate OSEG (owners of the sports teams and commercial portion). For sure, there are better locations for the arena, and the stadium for that matter, but they want to prop-up what's at Lansdowne today and eventually recover the costs through the "windfall" arrangement.

The idea is to build everything in stages:

1. Complete new arena;
2. Demolish Civic Centre and North Side stands;
3. Build new North Side stands, parking, retail and residential towers.

Not sure what the plan is for the one or two summers where we'll be left with a half stadium. They could add minimal temporary seating at both end-zones.

As happy as I am that the "district" does well (at least the few times I've been there for a CFL game -- are the retailers and restaurants busy on non-game-days?) the tail shouldn't wag the dog like that.

How well-used is the parkland? I'd be loathe to give that up too, but if people are mainly using the pathways and not the grassy expanses, a better plan could be realized. Hell, bury the entire arena beneath without a "berm" or mound so there's more potential for larger events at TD Place that rely temporary stands and have more impact on local spending (fully realizing that its just juggling discretionary money from one place to another, but make it worthwhile for the city at least!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7628  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:39 PM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
As happy as I am that the "district" does well (at least the few times I've been there for a CFL game -- are the retailers and restaurants busy on non-game-days?) the tail shouldn't wag the dog like that.

How well-used is the parkland? I'd be loathe to give that up too, but if people are mainly using the pathways and not the grassy expanses, a better plan could be realized. Hell, bury the entire arena beneath without a "berm" or mound so there's more potential for larger events at TD Place that rely temporary stands and have more impact on local spending (fully realizing that its just juggling discretionary money from one place to another, but make it worthwhile for the city at least!)
Sounds like a good idea. If the current arena has a stadium sitting on top if it, then they should build the new arena with ability to put a temporary structure on top. And when that isn't needed, which is most of the time, you can have useful open space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7629  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:48 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Is it? I am not sure why folks are surprised by this or outraged given precedent in N.A. and the current pitch of 'events' centre from an economic development standpoint.
People in Alberta are outraged with Smith considering she flat out said no (as the then-leader of the Wildrose in 2012) to any Provincial funding when Edmonton's arena deal was pitched, but here she is basically throwing public dollars at the arena project. The least she could do now is promise Edmonton and the smaller Alberta cities similiar 'capital improvement dollars' for their respective downtowns.
__________________
Bingo bango bongo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7630  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:49 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,853
I would think there will be 1 season in which the RedBlacks will only have a max capacity of 11,000 or so as it will likely take quite a bit longer than 7 months to demolish the arena and grandstand and build the new grandstand at Lansdowne.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7631  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 12:18 AM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Still chuckling at the comparison that McMahon is Fenway. Fenway has charm and character, MCMahon is just old.
I had to re-read that a few times to make sure they actually made that comparison. And while McMahon is old, it still far younger than Fenway.

The fact that everyone wants to tear down McMahon might be an indication that no one considers it anything close to a landmark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7632  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 12:41 AM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
For all the anti-Smith rhetoric I read from your posts (mostly completely valid, I agree), I’m waiting for you to rip mayor Gondek for the sweetheart deal she gave Murray Edwards now too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7633  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 12:42 AM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Calgary should just build a 30000 seat alerus center like und has in grand forks or fargodome as mcmahon always has terrible weather for playoffs and too cold to get fans then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7634  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 3:19 AM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
For all the anti-Smith rhetoric I read from your posts (mostly completely valid, I agree), I’m waiting for you to rip mayor Gondek for the sweetheart deal she gave Murray Edwards now too.
I’m not happy with Gondek or City Council either. See my post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Worth mentioning that 3 municipal elections had this issue looming in the background and CSEC even tried to prop up a fake candidate to get the deal done and lost to Nenshi each time. Gondek was viewed as his successor, but I think she got spooked after CSEC pulled the plug on the deal right after she got into office. Idiots blamed her. Still no excuse for this pile of dogshit though. No wonder they were so insistent on closed door negotiations. The public would be up in arms over this fleecing.

Also hilarious that Smith openly opposed provincial money going to Edmonton’s arena. She’s not even hiding the vote buying. Literally made this a ballot issue.

I think CSEC and Edwards bullied them and Nenshi never would have stood for such crap. Hell even Jeremy Farkas is calling this out as electioneering. He also stated that his campaign polling during the municipal election showed the majority of Calgarians opposed such a handout. I think our mayor can’t say much because it’s free money from the province. I’m very upset about the closed door meetings where our politicians seemingly got raped by CSEC. I cannot fathom how they are defending this model where a business is getting 70% of its operations covered by taxpayers. Elongated Musk should be aghast!

Last edited by O-tacular; Apr 27, 2023 at 5:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7635  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 4:28 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Engage Ottawa has survey on Lansdowne 2.0, and floor and site plans for the new OHL arena, CFL/CPL stadium north stands and the retail podium of the future condo/apartment towers.

Engage Ottawa: https://engage.ottawa.ca/lansdowne-2-0
Arena: https://engage.ottawa.ca/25667/widgets/125073/documents/103885
Stadium: https://engage.ottawa.ca/25667/widgets/125073/documents/103788
Retail Podium: https://engage.ottawa.ca/25667/widgets/125073/documents/103789
Looks good. I hope the new north stands improve the field lighting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7636  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 1:31 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
On this McMahon Stadium thing, I think Calgary will replace it soon. Either that or spend a similar amount on renovations. But with this massive arena project on the go, I think it's fair to say that Calgary's major sports venue dance card is going to be full for a while. The Stamps can check back in maybe in another 10 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7637  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 1:37 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
On this McMahon Stadium thing, I think Calgary will replace it soon. Either that or spend a similar amount on renovations. But with this massive arena project on the go, I think it's fair to say that Calgary's major sports venue dance card is going to be full for a while. The Stamps can check back in maybe in another 10 years.
A domed stadium would be great for calgary for winter rodeo shows boat shows monster truck rallies ect... its a market better suited for a dome being the corporate hub for western Canada of so many large companies
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7638  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 1:55 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
A domed stadium would be great for calgary for winter rodeo shows boat shows monster truck rallies ect... its a market better suited for a dome being the corporate hub for western Canada of so many large companies
I'm not sold on it. It would probably cost at least 50% more for a dome, and guaranteed within three years of the place opening people will be complaining about the poor atmosphere in a dome, 'why are you making me sit in a warehouse on a warm summer evening', etc. There is nothing about Alerus Center/Fargodome that seem appealing as a model for Calgary... They look like aircraft hangars with grandstands.

Football is meant to be played outdoors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7639  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 2:00 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I'm not sold on it. It would probably cost at least 50% more for a dome, and guaranteed within three years of the place opening people will be complaining about the poor atmosphere in a dome, 'why are you making me sit in a warehouse on a warm summer evening', etc. There is nothing about Alerus Center/Fargodome that seem appealing as a model for Calgary... They look like aircraft hangars with grandstands.

Football is meant to be played outdoors.
I am not a fan of fargodome but I like the alerts center. For building canadian stadiums always have to try and squeeze as much usability as you can out of it to try and secure funding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7640  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 6:11 PM
People_talking's Avatar
People_talking People_talking is offline
early dogecoin investor
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Calgary & Moncton
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
On this McMahon Stadium thing, I think Calgary will replace it soon. Either that or spend a similar amount on renovations. But with this massive arena project on the go, I think it's fair to say that Calgary's major sports venue dance card is going to be full for a while. The Stamps can check back in maybe in another 10 years.
Theres a concept plan thats already in place to redevelop the entire Foothills Athletic Park and renovate McMahon. Its a few years out but it starts with the demolition of the baseball stadium, replacing it with a new indoor multipart field house. The field house is supposed to be a catalyst to driver further development.

https://engage.calgary.ca/foothills-mcmahon
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.