Quote:
Originally Posted by laniroj
It'll be 30 years until those trees amount to anything resembling urban canopy and 25% of them will be dead by then too. I'll never understand treescape in Denver. 100 years ago, every street in Denver was lined with elms, maples, and cottonwoods and looked like the picture-esque Brooklyn brownstone streets. Then urban renewal happened and we've never cared about it since. Quite literally every larger City out west (and every city in the east) has a nice urban canopy, except Denver. Even downtown Vegas and Phoenix and Cheyenne make Denver look like a dust bowl.
|
You're not wrong - but we should also give credit where it is due. The Downtown Denver Partnership's
Urban Forest Initiative Grant Program would seem to demonstrate at least some understanding that trees need more to survive than a 5'X5' box in the sidewalk that never gets any water.
While I don't have a photo immediately available for reference, I would bet that those tree-lined streets had continuous tree-lawns like in Cap Hill and other residential neighborhoods. A 5'X5' box in the concrete jungle of downtown may work for cities that get more rain, but here the roots need more dirt to expand out into so they don't dry out quite so fast in a summer heat spell. I guess only time will tell if the larger 5'X15' planter boxes will be enough to restore the tree canopy downtown, but at least this effort demonstrates some recognition by landscape architects and the business district that we need to do more to keep trees healthy in Denver. As wong21fr pointed out, a major, professional landscape architecture firm should know how to get this right. The trees in Union Station plaza really do look pretty decent today, and they have replaced the trees that have failed.