Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight
You literally know nothing about this specific resident. SRO landlords who stock empty fire extinguishers and, as in this case, don't bother to turn on the sprinkler system are someone the victims here?
SRO landlords should know the challenges they will face before they get into the game, and if they are planning on being negligent with residents' and neighboring buildings' safety they should be held accountable.
|
You literally know nothing what happens to the landlords.
I would rather think many of the SRO landlords didn't know any better when they first "get into the game". One tries to trust the governmental charitable organizations and justice system, that they would do what is right and only allow deserving and sane/non-criminal folks to come stay at their properties, while holding the bad apples behind bars/institutions/rehab centres. But apparently this hasn't been so in this lovely city/province of ours. With the worsening situations, perhaps there comes a time when the challenges faced by the landlords are greater than their initial responsibilities. In the end, backing out right now would actually be better for them, except tax payers would have to foot more if the municipalities were to take over.
For this example, if the sprinkler system is already damaged due to theft, etc, pray tell how the owners are able to turn it on? Would you rather the building sustain flood damage?
Sometimes human sympathy really goes to the wrong people.