Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs
surprized as this should be in alberta with the looming mess with the tar sands brews but ok sweet for wpg
|
The Lake Winnipeg watershed has 7 million people living within it (including the North Sask in Edmonton) and the Lake is on the verge of dying from the algae bloom caused by excess nitrogen and phosphorus coming from pesticides and fertilizers used for irrigating the farmland here. It’s consuming the oxygen of the lake itself which could decimate the aquatic life.
Not to mention, the city of Winnipeg historically has had several historical creeks that fed into marshes so the Red River could get filtered. However, most of them have been paved over and has made the Lake Winnipeg issue worse.
That’s not even going into the sewage overflows because most of the inner city is on combined sewer systems. We also have a bunch of dams throughout various rivers for Hydro. Oh yea almost forgot but the Churchill river diversion has greatly impacted the wildlife in northern Manitoba.
If they don’t fix the major water problems here, then it could have major implications on North Dakota, Minnesota, Sask, and Alberta as well. Pair that with all the achievements related to water such as the floodway, retention ponds, and Hydro and it seems Winnipeg is a fitting choice.
The 100,000 or so lakes probably helps the case too.