Quote:
Originally Posted by jackster99
At first I was really pissed at the idea of this being torn down. But the more I look at pictures of it, it's not that outstanding of a building. Plenty more that are more beautiful and ornate.
As long as it is replaced with a supertall or even something in the 700-900 foot range and hopefully starchitect designed, I think it will be an acceptable loss.
|
It’s nice, but it’s not “I can’t believe they’re gonna tear it down” nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee
It's not as much it's individual uniqueness or architectural merits as much as its historic texture being an original Terminal City structure and how that is advantageous to the character of the neighborhood.
|
I’m glad you bring up Terminal City, because that’s exactly what we’re seeing, the legacy of Terminal City. And I hate to tell you, but that legacy is not for old buildings to stand for all time to represent another era. The legacy of Terminal City stands stronger than ever now, especially with the newly opened Madison Grand. And it’s why the City can enjoy new developments like One Vanderbilt, 270 Park, 175 Park, and others. Other places may see the cores of their cities wither away in importance, but thankfully the city understands what it has here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan
Seems like a waste to put a 5-600 foot tall blue box in Manhattan
|
What is this 5-600 foot tall blue box you speak of?