https://auburn.edu/administration/ir/fac...cs/total-enrollment/by-demographics.html Auburn does not make it easy to get their first time student info. I have seen it on their website, and the data backs up what I wrote above. I will keep trying to find that specific data point.
Most of the time, they simply use the term freshman, which includes a small, but significant number of students who are not first time students, but who have still not progressed beyond the freshman status. But even with that caveat, it is easy to see below that Auburn is more successful than UA at attracting freshman students. Just click on the link above and choose the appropriate categories and you can compare their numbers of freshman with that of UA. Like I said, we have a problem at UA, and our leaders need to figure out the solution, unless they are ok with UA being less popular than AU with instate students.
UA First time student in state (2021) 2,799 (2022) 2,851 UA uses "first time" to avoid offending the Office of DEI with non-gender neutral language
AU Freshman student in state (2021) 3,584 (2022) 3,939 AU still uses freshman, but this again can include students who are no longer first time students.
Yes, we were making progress closing the in state enrollment gap, but in the last two years Auburn has reversed that trend, despite all of the positive factors already mentioned in UA's favor. Why? I believe academic reputation is the reason, and UA alumni better wake up and put pressure on Stewart Bell and other members of the "everything is going swell" crowd in Tuscaloosa.