Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O
The odd height limits suggest to me they are making the change for a specific project. This may be the real reason Stadium Tower was put on hold. If they are looking at a significant height increase, they would need to go back to the drawing board for design, permit drawings, etc. before they would start on permanent foundations.
|
It doesn't seem so. The odd number appear to be from the increase being 36.36% (since that's what CMU-Gateway was increased by)
Given the TOD-Gateway and TOD-Midway Zone entitlement modifications were impacted by the CMUGateway Zone increases, Staff analyzed proportional increases to the CMU-Gateway and how those
modifications affected other subdistricts. With the CMU-Gateway modifications, there was a 50% increase in
maximum FAR and a 36% increase in building height when using a development bonus. Therefore, without
a development economic study, Staff followed the Council policy direction and used the proportional increase
to CMU-Gateway to arrive at the FAR and building height increases as described above. There are no
overlays that would prevent increases to entitlements and neither subdistrict is subject to LDC Article 10 -
Compatibility Standards.