Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoNerd
I don’t see the correlation between a “Toronto Style” waterfront and using the waterfront paths. Why can’t there be both? A densely developed waterfront with some natural areas and cycling/walking paths. It doesn’t need to be one or the other. We wouldn’t build on top of the path system. What am I missing?
|
Never seen the Toronto waterfront, but Vancouver strikes an excellent balance, with development and retail/restaurants at grade facing the waterfront with a public paths (segregated cycling/walking) in between. Yu get the best of both worlds.
Threaded Mode