HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8541  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2023, 9:17 PM
Boreal's Avatar
Boreal Boreal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcsta View Post
.....aaand I'd like to divert our attention back to the St. Regis site proposal. A friend of mine who works at hydro has informed me the site is being prepared for "something big". Take this anecdote with a grain of salt!!
Pretty slick looking Hydro substation!?
     
     
  #8542  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2023, 12:14 AM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreal View Post
Pretty slick looking Hydro substation!?
Probably not.

MH has land by HSC off of William for a large substation that would allow them to provide additional power to the west end.

It was suppose to go into service a few years ago but has been deferred and service is currently being delivered from the "new" station on Notre Dame @ Adelaide.

When the HSC area load gets bigger or the downtown load gets bigger then the HSC station will be built

.
     
     
  #8543  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 3:49 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Have it hand it to the Wellington Cresc. crowd in their ability to keep infill housing at bay, declare your neighbourhood a heritage district for starters and then oppose, oppose and oppose like hell anything that smells of change!

Even lefty Orlikow tows the company line despite saying the opposite elsewhere in Winnipeg!

Bet that infill pusher Allard will stay mum as he’s figured out who to kowtow to and when and where limits can be pushed!
     
     
  #8544  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 4:09 PM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Posts: 1,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Have it hand it to the Wellington Cresc. crowd in their ability to keep infill housing at bay, declare your neighbourhood a heritage district for starters and then oppose, oppose and oppose like hell anything that smells of change!

Even lefty Orlikow tows the company line despite saying the opposite elsewhere in Winnipeg!

Bet that infill pusher Allard will stay mum as he’s figured out who to kowtow to and when and where limits can be pushed!
Yea what is really funny is that it’s not like these condos are low-income or on a side street. It’s on the intersection of Wellington/Kingsway which has apartment blocks not more then 500 metres away. The condos themselves are probably going to cost more then the houses next to them lol.

That always made me wonder how the hell the city managed to get any sort of high density housing on Wellington in the first place. The stretch from Grosvenor to Stradbrook is quite impressive in how many apartments and middle housing they were able to build with all the NIMBYism in the area.
     
     
  #8545  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 4:32 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebasketballgeek View Post
Yea what is really funny is that it’s not like these condos are low-income or on a side street. It’s on the intersection of Wellington/Kingsway which has apartment blocks not more then 500 metres away. The condos themselves are probably going to cost more then the houses next to them lol.

That always made me wonder how the hell the city managed to get any sort of high density housing on Wellington in the first place. The stretch from Grosvenor to Stradbrook is quite impressive in how many apartments and middle housing they were able to build with all the NIMBYism in the area.
You nailed it!

It’s funny though when city clowncillors have so much to say against nimbys and those opposed to unrealistic infill and condo projects elsewhere in the city but all are suddenly mute when it comes to this specific area!
     
     
  #8546  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 4:34 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
You nailed it!

It’s funny though when city clowncillors have so much to say against nimbys and those opposed to unrealistic infill and condo projects elsewhere in the city but all are suddenly mute when it comes to this specific area!
Not just that specific area...

...Tuxedo too
     
     
  #8547  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2023, 8:50 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,376
New build going up next to the U of W:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...outh-1.6710334

I think this is just a parking lot at the moment. Good news for the U of W, Indigenous students and the area in general.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
     
     
  #8548  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2023, 8:54 PM
DonaldSmith's Avatar
DonaldSmith DonaldSmith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wpg, Mb
Posts: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
New build going up next to the U of W:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...outh-1.6710334

I think this is just a parking lot at the moment. Good news for the U of W, Indigenous students and the area in general.
380 Young is the lot. Faber / Paragon is involved with the development.

https://380young.com/

Last edited by DonaldSmith; Jan 11, 2023 at 8:57 PM. Reason: link
     
     
  #8549  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2023, 9:30 PM
Sheepish Sheepish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 361
That is not an attractive building. Sad
     
     
  #8550  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 2:06 AM
post_man post_man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 135
I haven't been down Young in a while. When did they demolish the houses?
     
     
  #8551  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 2:09 AM
Boreal's Avatar
Boreal Boreal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,704
While the building will not be a looker, it’s seemingly a tremendous fit.
     
     
  #8552  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 4:19 AM
pegcityboy's Avatar
pegcityboy pegcityboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 582
Paragon loves black and white everything , good project to fill up an empty lot but how about some imagination please !
     
     
  #8553  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 1:42 PM
davequanbury davequanbury is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by post_man View Post
I haven't been down Young in a while. When did they demolish the houses?
Did they demolish the houses?
     
     
  #8554  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 2:57 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by pegcityboy View Post
Paragon loves black and white everything , good project to fill up an empty lot but how about some imagination please !
The building will be practically invisible. That stretch of Young Street, with the massive U of W athletics buildings looming right over it, is the ultimate filler building location. I get that you wouldn't want something like this on, say, Broadway. But on this site it works.
     
     
  #8555  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 3:26 PM
Coil Coil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 26
I think it's reasonable to have higher expectations. This city is in serious need of some beautification, and that is a lowest-common-denominator design.
     
     
  #8556  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 3:28 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by davequanbury View Post
Did they demolish the houses?
Not sure when the houses on Young were demoed to make way for the apartment building but clips on the news yesterday definitely showed it happened already.
     
     
  #8557  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 4:05 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coil View Post
I think it's reasonable to have higher expectations. This city is in serious need of some beautification, and that is a lowest-common-denominator design.
With the money the project had, perhaps this is all they could afford if they were going to maximize the number of suites inside the structure? I understand the desire for aesthetic beauty, but in this case especially I think the function of the building overrides quibbling about colours and finishes. Indigenous student housing/low income housing is desperately needed, so in this case I think the function of the inside of the building is much more important than what people may see driving or walking past it for a few seconds on the outside.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
     
     
  #8558  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 5:39 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Not sure when the houses on Young were demoed to make way for the apartment building but clips on the news yesterday definitely showed it happened already.
Looking at Google maps its been a parking lot since at least 2007 as that is the earliest picture of the lot on file
     
     
  #8559  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 6:29 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
announcement today of a $1.5 billion redevelopment of the area around Polo Park, including the old stadium site....residential and commercial. A great transition from the retail hellscape it is today.

https://www.chrisd.ca/2023/01/12/pol...al-retail/amp/





Last edited by trueviking; Jan 12, 2023 at 7:01 PM.
     
     
  #8560  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2023, 6:53 PM
Winnipegger Winnipegger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 824
While "exploratory" renderings almost always look better than the final, value-engineered product, seeing any type of development at that scale in that area would be wonderful. 4,000 units is several years' worth of multi-family supply in Winnipeg, so it would definitely eat away at multi-family development occurring anywhere else (downtown, railside at the Forks, and suburbs) in the short term.

But the upside is that this area is already well-serviced with many amenities with little need for infrastructure upgrades (given Winnipeg standards), so I'd take this over adding 4,000 units to Bridgwater or Amber Trails any day.

Plus adding residential density near Manitoba's biggest mall will only help bolster sales at the mall, which is a win-win for local and regional shoppers and Cadillac-Fairview.

I hope it happens!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.