Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen
  All of this is part of being 'Politically Correct.' And as whatnext observed, what's the angst calling someone a chronic offender if it's a documented fact? The Politically Correct movement infiltrates all things public, probably nowhere more so than law and legal terminology. I think that people will have to adapt to it and swallow it, in some instances, unless there's a groundswell against it, or even to put limits on it.
|
There is no political correctness involved. The Provincial Government report in question is titled "A Rapid Investigation into Repeat Offending and Random Stranger Violence in British Columbia" Whatnext and Hollywoodnorth are trying to suggest some woke alternate reality that doesn't exist, and they obviously haven't read the report. Or even the summary.
Whatnext is trying to make some sort of point in inaccurately referencing a comment made by the BC First Nations Justice Council in response to the panel. "
The term “prolific offenders” is abandoned by government authorities and all police, as this term not only perpetuates harm and stigma but also fails to address that these individuals lack security and safety."
As the Report title, and all the subsequent government action relating to the report uses the term 'Repeat Offender' there's no pretence that it isn't an issue that needs attention.