HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21761  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2022, 12:37 PM
The Pimp's Avatar
The Pimp The Pimp is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 421
Another wonderful box. Pathetic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21762  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2022, 2:11 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 810
I think it's fine if it's built as the rendering shows. Plus, that parking lot —.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21763  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2022, 3:19 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,008
It would be nice to have something bigger there. We've only got one Union Station, and the land around it should be developed as intensely as possible.

But Union Station's been around for over 100 years, and this is the first development proposal to come along for this — parking lot (as far as I know) so I'm in favor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21764  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2022, 3:35 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 810
I work a block away and there's already a fence around the existing building with some construction equipment as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21765  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2022, 10:20 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
It would be nice to have something bigger there. We've only got one Union Station, and the land around it should be developed as intensely as possible.

But Union Station's been around for over 100 years, and this is the first development proposal to come along for this — parking lot (as far as I know) so I'm in favor.

Don't doubt this is the case, but at the same time still shaking my head in disbelief.....how can that possibly be?!

Sometimes the heard is stampeding so fast it forgets to look around for a few blocks at a time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21766  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 3:35 AM
pip's Avatar
pip pip is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
I actually like this building. Great pedestrian experience.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21767  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 4:52 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip View Post
I actually like this building. Great pedestrian experience.
Agreed. It looks like it will provide a decent to above-average street-level experience. 14 floors certainly beat the pants off its immediate neighbors.

I wish it was a boutique office instead of a residential but the market just doesn't seem to call for it ATM. Always love another p-lot biting the dust.

Last edited by nomarandlee; Nov 3, 2022 at 7:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21768  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 5:08 AM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh777 View Post
Demo permits issued for 558 & 560 W Van Buren Friday. Looks like the initial steps for the broader 566 W Van Buren Development. Will be nice to add some residential units in this pocket. Long overdue.

One of those is the venerated Bombacingo's. RIP.

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9665616&postcount=21147

Living here would be sweet as you could roll out of bed and grab breakfast at Lou Mitchell's
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21769  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 2:33 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
...you could roll out of bed and grab breakfast at Lou Mitchell's
The Dream.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21770  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 2:46 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip View Post
I actually like this building. Great pedestrian experience.
I agree it's much better than an office tower with blank walls and no retail. I assume this will have several independent retail spaces available to be a traditional urban building. I will take that every time over extra height.

Update: I guess it only has one retail space planned at the corner, unfortunately, so that makes me appreciate it less.

Last edited by BrinChi; Nov 1, 2022 at 4:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21771  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2022, 6:39 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 810
Taken yesterday re: Jefferson & Van Buren

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21772  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2022, 4:22 AM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,107
From

https://chicagoyimby.com/2022/07/new-res...566-w-van-buren-street-in-west-loop.html

Quote:
Due to the zoning at the property site, the project is able to move ahead without first securing approval.
Expecting ground breaking before Thanksgiving

Quote:
Originally Posted by gebs View Post
Taken yesterday re: Jefferson & Van Buren

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21773  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2022, 2:52 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
Expecting ground breaking before Thanksgiving
As long as they have a construction permit and financing lined up, I don't see why not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21774  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2022, 1:49 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh777 View Post
Demo permits issued for 558 & 560 W Van Buren Friday. Looks like the initial steps for the broader 566 W Van Buren Development. Will be nice to add some residential units in this pocket. Long overdue.

This is a handsome building and a stylistically appropriate design for the neighborhood. . . I don't see the outrage

. . .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21775  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2022, 3:58 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,296
^ I Agree!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21776  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2022, 12:45 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,289
Looks handsome and well-proportioned to me. Nothing to complain about here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21777  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2022, 3:10 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,834
160 N. Morgan

10.30.22






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21778  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2022, 3:12 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,834
166 N. Aberdeen

10.30.22


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21779  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2022, 3:53 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,834
1112 W. Carroll

Saw a bit of digging at the site earlier. The guys weren't sure when caissons would start.

11.03.22


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #21780  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2022, 4:45 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,834
Big Deahl

10.30.22


Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.