Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan
Dyas is a pro business, BC-Lib/Fed conservative mayor. In Kelowna, real estate is the primary big business. He wouldn't have been my first choice, but he is far from anti-development. Like Vancouver, it's more a tough on crime / pro-development candidate beating a centre/centre left pro-development candidate.
|
I mean I don't think he's off to a great start based on how he ran as as someone advocating for transparency then removed his campaign promises from his website.
Even the internet archiver doesn't have his platform archived. All I have are someone else's screenshots they took of it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220921...w.tomdyas.com/
https://postimg.cc/gallery/JhygzpX
I remember on his original campaign website that he took jabs at Basran for allowing all these high-rises to go up in Kelowna and how they didn't help with creating affordable housing for people living in Kelowna....
We all know that Downtown Kelowna, or Kelowna in general is not a cheap place to build high-rises, especially not affordable ones so it came across as a really stupid anti development point to make in my opinion.
At least his platform mentions reducing barriers for building missing middle developments, but that's still not the complete solution we need. Ignoring genuine densification via strategically located high-rise developments (residential hubs) throughout the city, along with 5 over 1 and missing middle townhomes is the solution. My worry is he'll ignore high-rises because of a vocal anti development population in Kelowna in order to keep his seat as Mayor.
I'm not a huge fan of Basran Or Dyas, but at least Basran made way for developers to see what Kelowna could look like with high-rises by allowing all these initial projects through. If Dyas pulls back too hard I'm worried the momentum that has been created will fall off.