Quote:
Originally Posted by thebasketballgeek
Edmonton and Saskatoon are easily the most undervalued cities in the country. Afaik they are also experiencing pretty good population growth as well so what makes them so successful in retaining their affordability?
And yikes Manitoba having higher rents then Alberta. We needed to build new rentals outside of Winnipeg for atleast a decade but the NIMBYs in rural and small town Manitoba are too strong.
|
Again, a couple educated guesses. Looking at Edmonton specifically, it seems that the construction process would generally be cheaper and quicker than average. The land is nearly always already flat and clear, it is easy to dig for things like basements/underground garages, taxes (on materials, etc) are the lowest in Canada, fuel and electricity prices are among the lowest in Canada, there is limited red tape. Contrast this with Halifax (for example) which has high taxes, high fuel and electricity prices, new developments typically involve clearing forest, blasting/grading, or dismantling and then reconstructing heritage buildings, and there are very stringent environmental/design restrictions on most new developments.
Edmonton's architecture also tends to be somewhat "plainer" on average than in most other large Canadian cities (which are "frilly" in comparison), which tends to further reduce materials and design costs. Since most everyday things in Edmonton tend to be good value for money, smaller landlords also might not feel that they need to charge as much, since their own expenses are probably a bit less difficult to cover than in many other parts of the country and it is easier to save up money.
I'm less familiar with SK but I get the impression that Saskatoon and Regina would have similar advantages to Edmonton (just a bit less removed from the Canadian average).