Quote:
Originally Posted by yaletown_fella
This means most Canadians will be destitute in retirement, if they dont own a home.
|
You mean if they sell their home when they retire and use the money to pay rent for an apartment?
I understand the concept of home ownership being an asset, but it's an asset they have to live in, spend money to maintain, and pay taxes and insurance on. That's why every time I read about homeowners being "rich" because they own a home and the values have shot up, it doesn't make sense to me as you still have to pay for a place to live.
So if I paid $200,000 for my house and it's now worth $400,000, on paper I have just gained $200,000 of net worth. However, I still have to live here (and want to live here), so I have no more disposable income, and am affected by inflation just like everybody else. The only difference is that I am lucky and privileged enough to own a home.
Sorry, off topic a little, but it's just that I keep reading this idea of wealth through home ownership, but on the ground it doesn't mean you are flush with money, just that you have a place to live that you could cash out on if you want/need to downgrade your living situation at some point.
One issue I see is seniors that spend their life savings to stay in their home, eventually sell their home and move to a senior's facility, only to have the house money eaten up by care expenses. I've seen it happen.
It's still better than living on the street, though.