Quote:
Originally Posted by kool maudit
I know an American girl from White Plains, NY, who moved to Toronto for work and couldn't wait to open an account at "Royal Bank" because it sounded so exotic to her. The city had a VERY British/Commonwealth appearance and feel to her, which was interesting to see. It wasn't Queens.
Speaking very personally, though, I find that after 10 years abroad and 15 years in Montreal, the category that I relate to the most is Winston Churchill's formulation from "The history of the English-speaking peoples". Maybe it's my English dad, or having lived in London, or maybe it's just Montreal. But in my heart of hearts, I'm an... Anglo before anything else. Kiwis, Americans, Aussies are all very legible, are all 'home', even though their particularities might be interesting and unknown to me, in some cases. But if I'm part of a history and of course I am, it is "The history of the English-speaking peoples".
|
That’s interesting. On the Franco side, I think there is a similar sense of “home” between France, Romandie and Wallonie, but then you get to Quebec and there is (still) a sharp drop. It’s fading though, and we may reach something like what you describe within a generation or two at this rate.
Beyond that, even the French overseas territories are somewhat debatable. For better or worse, Tahiti is absolutely not a French Hawaii, not in that sense anyway, despite what you would expect (Kauai especially just looks so much like Tahiti, it’s uncanny. And the local languages are basically one and the same, and on a similar course towards potential extinction). To say nothing of the many French speaking African countries of course which are entirely next level. So I don’t think francophones really experience things the same way, despite the reach and diversity of the French-speaking world (which is admittedly a distant second to that of the Anglo world).