Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Those are realistic, but Houston has to be the juiciest tomato on the vine. Huge city, lots of money, probably a good number of transplants from around the US who might be interested in hockey.
But then there are the smaller cities where the NHL can be a big fish. Places like Milwaukee, Austin, Tulsa, even Hartford.
|
The NHL's neutral site preseason games give us insight into where the league thinks they might want to push. The most interesting preseason game locations this year are ARZ/VGK in
Boise, CHI/MIN in
Milwaukee, and LA/VGK in
Salt Lake City. Tulsa, Wichita, and Independence, MO (Kansas City) are also getting games. Some of these are simply to cover team-allotted territories and some are to gauge a little interest here and there.
If I were the NHL rubbing a crystal ball i'd be looking at places around the midwest where the sport is showing good signs of growing with key demos already in place. Houston is fine but feels a bit like the Atlanta situation where the league might get lost in the noise. Need a city where they can be a priority for local governance and support whilst maximizing growth potential. Getting in early before other leagues can worked for the NHL in Vegas (and Raleigh, and Nashville...), so getting in early on a mid-sized market showing good growth would be wise.