HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1661  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2022, 4:05 AM
Keep-SA-Lame's Avatar
Keep-SA-Lame Keep-SA-Lame is offline
COGSADCAJA- Publicist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,178
It's insanity the MPO has even been humoring this 🞵🞵🞵🞵 proposal. Such a disgrace.

Relevant Youtube explainer from City Nerd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfVdge8DhB4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1662  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2022, 4:22 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keep-SA-Lame View Post
It's insanity the MPO has even been humoring this 🞵🞵🞵🞵 proposal. Such a disgrace.

Relevant Youtube explainer from City Nerd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfVdge8DhB4
This video pretty much verifies everything I thought about the tunnel scheme, plus a few things I hadn't thought of. Very informative. And the guy's delivery is subtly funny. Thanks for posting.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1663  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 3:58 PM
dilliam dilliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 172
I thought that they scrapped The Boring Co. as an option? I really like that YT channel btw. He consistently puts out great content.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1664  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2022, 9:36 PM
DanielG425 DanielG425 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
I'd much prefer high speed rail to some billionaire's goofy single lane car tunnel that just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen both in terms of safety and finances
If only safety regulation and city reviews existed. Oh wait. They do. I don’t care who builds it - it needs to get built. Such a boring perspective you have
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1665  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2022, 10:21 PM
Spoiler's Avatar
Spoiler Spoiler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielG425 View Post
If only safety regulation and city reviews existed. Oh wait. They do. I don’t care who builds it - it needs to get built. Such a boring perspective you have
More like an anti-boring perspective, hmm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1666  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2022, 1:09 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
VIA CEO confident airport-to-downtown rapid bus project is on fast track for federal funding

https://sanantonioreport.org/san-antonio-advanced-rapid-transit-plan-via/

Support from the Biden administration and an influx of cash from federal COVID-19 relief is bumping up the timeline for San Antonio’s plan to offer rapid bus services from downtown to the San Antonio Airport, according to VIA Metropolitan Transit President and CEO Jeff Arndt.

Speaking to business and city leaders at the San Antonio’s State of Transit at the Witte Museum on Friday, Arndt said construction on the $320 million North-South portion of the Advanced Rapid Transit plan is now likely begin in 2025 and be completed in 2027. That’s five years sooner than VIA had projected it would take to complete the project without matching federal funding, which it leveraged COVID-19 relief funding to pursue.

The North-South project is expected to receive $158 million from President Joe Biden’s 2023 budget, thanks in part to the city’s ability to demonstrate a plan for matching funds. It did so, Arndt said, by using federal pandemic relief money to fund day-to-day operations while diverting some of VIA’s normal funding into a reserve.

...

The North-South line would begin at the San Antonio International Airport and travel in dedicated lanes along San Pedro through downtown, extending past the Blue Star Arts Complex in Southtown. The zero-emission rapid transit buses are supposed to expedite airport transportation by operating in their own designated lanes, using traffic signal prioritization and an off-board payment system.

The project is currently undergoing environmental reviews before construction can begin, said Arndt.

The project’s East-West segment would stretch from General McMullen Drive on the West Side to near the AT&T Center along parts of Houston and Commerce streets.

...

The Federal Transit Administration did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment Friday afternoon.

VIA is exploring several options to provide the local funding, but Arndt declined to provide details. Arndt said San Antonio has already maxed out the sales tax it used to pay for the North-West portion of the project.

City officials are trying to work quickly before the 2024 presidential election.

“You could have a change of administration that might not be as supportive of our kinds of projects as the current,” said Arndt.

Without any additional funding, Ardnt said VIA’s financial plan indicates the East-West line would not open until 2055.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1667  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2022, 5:53 AM
SproutingTowers's Avatar
SproutingTowers SproutingTowers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 524
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1668  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2022, 6:12 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
VIA seeks community’s input on advanced rapid transit

https://sanantonioreport.org/via-seeks-communitys-input-on-advanced-rapid-transit-sponsored/

VIA Metropolitan Transit will hold a second round of public input meetings in June and July aimed at continuing the community conversation about the planned Advanced Rapid Transit corridor, which would run from the San Antonio International Airport to south of downtown.

Feedback gathered at public meetings and through online comment forms continue to help inform the design process for Advanced Rapid Transit, or ART. The ART project is designed to deliver new, frequent, fast and reliable public transportation that moves more people faster and farther. The project is part of VIA’s Keep SA Moving plan, for which voters approved funding in November 2020.

VIA will host meetings in June and July at:

9:30-11:30 a.m., Saturday, June 25, at Blessed Sacrament, 600 Oblate
5:30-7:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 29, at the Norris Conference Center, 618 NW Loop 410
5:30-7:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 12, at Hermann Sons, 525 S. St. Mary’s St.

Rapid transit options help connect more people to jobs and training, goods and services and education. ART vehicles traveling in dedicated lanes save time and simplify trips, enhance service and safety for all users and provide more transportation options in San Antonio. The first ART corridor would run from the airport along San Pedro Avenue through downtown and connect with continuing service near Mission Concepción.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1669  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2022, 4:40 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
New Texas GOP platform condemns ‘road diets,’ complicating path for Broadway

https://sanantonioreport.org/greg-abbott-broadway-renovation-lane-reductions/

Proponents of San Antonio’s Broadway renovation hope Gov. Greg Abbott will back down on his opposition to lane reductions — a key feature of the project’s multimodal corridor — after the November election.

But transportation activists who’ve supported the governor are seeking to tie his hands on the issue as Abbott heads into a tightening reelection race this fall.

Plank 63 in the 2022 Texas GOP platform, released Wednesday, calls for the party to oppose “anti-car measures,” including ‘road diet’ mandates designed to shrink auto capacity and/or intentionally clog vehicle lanes to force deference to pedestrian, bike, and mass transit options.”

...

“My initial thought when this happened was … this is obviously very politically motivated,” said Kevin Wolff, a Republican who sits on the board of an agency that coordinates the area’s state, local and federal transportation plans. “The governor is coming into an election cycle and knows what appeals to his base and what doesn’t.”

...

Across the state, Hall said her group of activists have leaned on a good relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and J. Bruce Bugg Jr., chairman of the Texas Transportation Commission that oversees TxDOT, to stop cities from pursuing thoroughfare makeover projects like Broadway, even if political donors might favor them.

Residents living around “major urban areas, they’re all upset with what’s happened to the downtown areas,” said Hall, whose group counts tens of thousands of members across the state, including Republicans and Democrats.

“[The cities] have put so much interference in the way of cars, which of course causes congestion, which causes idling of cars which causes more emissions, which causes all the other problems everybody gripes about,” she said.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1670  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2022, 4:33 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
VIA: High gas prices and fewer COVID fears mean more people are riding the bus

https://sanantonioreport.org/via-high-gas-prices-fewer-covid-fears-more-people-riding-bus/

Bus ridership has been steadily increasing in 2022, said the city’s transit agency this week, with April’s numbers one-fifth higher than last year.

VIA Metropolitan Transit credits the rise to higher fuel prices and lower COVID-19 concerns. And indeed, case counts dropped dramatically after the 2021-2022 winter surge, with the city’s public health department reporting very low numbers in April.

VIA’s average weekday bus ridership dashboard shows ridership rose to 67,000 that month, from about 55,500 in April 2021.

The conditions the agency credits with increasing ridership do appear to be changing, however. COVID-19 case counts are rising once again — the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District recently categorized the region’s risk level as high and worsening, while hospitalizations are creeping back up.

Gas prices, too, have begun to decline, dropping every day for the past month, according to the AAA auto club. In San Antonio, the average price is now $4.026, down from $4.676 a month ago.

Matthew Williams, who lives near downtown and takes the #25 bus route to his job at Ripley’s Believe it or Not, across from the Alamo, said his morning commute is definitely more crowded.

Williams said he personally has not heard of people riding the bus due to an increase in fuel prices, but the VIA bus driver on route #25 Thursday said passengers mention fuel prices “all the time.”

A VIA spokeswoman said that historically, VIA’s ridership increases when fuel prices go up. While gas prices have been dropping, a single fare of $1.30 is still far less than the cost of a gallon of gas, the agency noted in its release. Buying a day, weekly or monthly pass brings down the cost to riders down even further. A 30-day pass is $38.

While many transit agencies saw steep declines in early 2020 due to pandemic restrictions and safety concerns, VIA reported that it maintained more than 50% of its ridership at the height of the pandemic. The agency credits increased safety protocols — along with being an essential service.

Williams, who has been a regular bus commuter for the past five years, said that even during the peak of COVID-19, when busses had a passenger capacity, drivers would often have to pass by bus stops and signal to people waiting that the bus was full.

Since VIA dropped its mask requirement, “everyone just forgot it existed,” he said. The pandemic has dragged on so long … time can kind of get rid of a lot.”

According to VIA, a handful of routes in particular have seen big boosts in ridership. VIA reported the biggest jump for route #93, which runs between the University of Texas San Antonio and Centro Plaza, located on the west side of downtown. Ridership was up 198% from April 2021 to April 2022.

Ridership increased 83% year over year on route #103, known as Primo Zarzamora, which runs between the Medical Center to Crossroads Blvd., 57% for route #4, the San Pedro bus route, 36% for the Loop 410/ WW White Skip bus route #552, which runs between Brooks Transit Center to Kel-Lac Transit Center and 22% for route #20, which runs between the Brooks Transit Center to Centro Plaza.

“Over the past two years, we have endured extraordinary circumstances as a community but have maintained our focus on keeping San Antonio moving forward, safely,” said Jeffrey C. Arndt, VIA CEO. “Today, more than ever, affordable, reliable public transit is essential, and we are seeing more people use VIA to stay connected to work, school, doctors, groceries and each other.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1671  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2022, 5:11 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Purpose of San Pedro Avenue’s ‘extra’ right of way a puzzle

https://www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/San-Pedro-mystery-photo-Texas-17309655.php

Attached is a photo of San Pedro at Jackson-Keller looking north circa 1959. Based on other photos I have from the Texas Highway Department of San Pedro that are taken from the same vantage point and around the same time, I'm sure this photo was also taken by the Highway Department. San Pedro, of course, was U.S. 281 at this time.
As you can see at the right, stores along here had their own parking lots, at least initially, so it doesn't seem like it would have been built for parking. And if so, why only on this section and one side?

By the mid -960s, the motel at 6808 San Pedro (now the El Montan) had encroached on this paved area with their front porte-cochere. Soon after, several areas had been sectioned off and turned into parking lots. Today, the entire stretch is used for parking lots, but a check of tax records shows that it is all still public right of way.

My initial thought was that it may have been a provisional military airstrip, but given it is less than 2.5 miles from the airport, that seems unlikely. Since this was during the height of Cold War angst, my other thought is that it may have been for civil-defense purposes, such as an evacuation marshaling area or as a location for emergency shelters, hospitals or supply dumps. Or maybe it had some other arcane purpose.

— Brian Purcell

If the author of the Texas Highwayman website, www.texashighwayman.com, doesn't know, we are in seriously uncharted territory. In fact, this newspaper published a story about Brian Purcell headlined “Road question? Texas Highwayman knows the answer,” Dec. 29, 2015.

Both of us have reached out to the Texas Department of Transportation, or TxDOT, without success. The agency’s published rules on the width of right of way — the width between property lines and the road — don’t help either as they relate to the amount of traffic (not much at the time) and speed cars need to attain to get on the main road (also not that big a leap at the time).

What we do know is that San Pedro Avenue, so-named because it starts in front of San Pedro Springs Park, was and is a north-south artery and until the McAllister Freeway was built between 1969 and 1978, this stretch was a part of U.S. 281, a highway that connects Mexico to Canada.

The undated photograph that shows this unusually wide place in the road must have been taken in the late 1950s to early ’60s from the scant evidence it contains. The Robert Hall Clothing Center in the picture opened in 1956 at 6522 San Pedro Ave., and the El Montan Motor Hotel was built in 1950 (then numbered as 6806 San Pedro) with an addition and remodeling in 1963.

This area was part of what the San Antonio Express described as “the extreme northern stretch” of San Pedro Avenue in a Feb. 6, 1966, story on business development. “The Miracle Strip in Business Growth” was a nine-block stretch ending at Loop 410 where, before 1957, there was “little more (than) scrub oak, mesquite trees and a few dotted service stations.” Then came new subdivisions off San Pedro, and retail development followed, including strip shopping centers and free-standing businesses, shown in an accompanying photo shown online of the 7000 block of San Pedro — based on the presence of the Northview Concourse center — that depicts lots of signs and parking lots … and a normal-looking shoulder.

“My best guess is that they were planning to widen the road to three lanes in each direction,” said Hugh Hemphill, author of “San Antonio on Wheels: The Alamo City Learns to Drive,” who then suggested that I ask the Texas Highwayman (before he knew that’s where the question came from).

If anyone knows why this curiously extra expanse of paved space was built along a single side of San Pedro, contact this column. All replies will be forwarded and may be quoted in a future column.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1672  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2022, 7:38 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Residents continue to hound Alamo RMA over Boring Co.'s proposed San Antonio tunnel project

Attendees at the RMA's Wednesday meeting raised questions about the environmental impact of the tunnel proposed by billionaire Elon Musk's company.

https://www.sacurrent.com/news/residents...osed-san-antonio-tunnel-project-29414412

On Wednesday, during their first meeting in two months, board members of the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority offered no updates on the San Antonio tunnel proposed by billionaire Elon Musk's Boring Co.

Indeed, the project wasn't even listed as a topic of discussion on the agenda.

Just the same, concerned residents showed up to voice frustration with what they called secretive dealings, wasteful spending and lack of geological awareness around Musk's hyperloop proposal.

"It's been very quiet," Patsy Light, a 90-year-old resident and author said during the citizen's feedback portion of the meeting. "And I think it's very stinky of a committee appointed by the government to make decisions that affect all of us and don't tell us."

According to Alamo RMA Board Member Michael Lynd Jr., the transportation authority has been quiet on the project because there's been no movement on the proposed tunnel since the RMA's confusing May meeting.

During that gathering, Light pointed out a footnote written by Alamo RMA attorney Brian Cassidy in a handout provided to attendees. Cassidy's footnote appeared to cast doubt on the revenue projections provided to the Alamo RMA by the Boring Co. The footnote seemed to estimate that the project would generate far less revenue than the Boring Co.'s $25 million projection.

San Antonio attorney Kirk Patterson didn't forget about the footnote, voicing concern at Wednesday's meeting that the tunnel project is nothing more than another wasteful and inefficient infrastructure project.

"You do not want to risk building a tunnel that becomes as empty as the park-and-ride terminal on [U.S. Highway] 281," Patterson said. "That terrible park-and-ride terminal is a monument to the misuse of taxpayer money, and this is considerably more expensive, this tunnel, than that park-and-ride terminal that's empty."

Patterson is referring to the controversial 400-space VIA Park and Ride garage at the corner of U.S. 281 and Stone Oak Parkway. At a combined cost of $24.6 million, the garage has been underutilized, with an average of only 520 riders per day, according to KSAT investigation.

All of the residents who spoke during Wednesday's meeting voiced concern over the potential environmental impacts of the Boring Co. proposal.

"Please take a step back, and carry out your investigation of environmental concerns with great diligence," said Carol Patterson, a board member of the Edwards Aquifer Authority, speaking as a private citizen. "There are surely additional hydrogeologic considerations that have not yet been considered. As an example, I have personally seen the Blue Hole act as a recharge feature. Connections to other aquifers in the area may also have significance to recharge that could be disrupted by this tunnel."

The concerns of Carol Patterson — Kirk Patterson's wife — echoed those of St. Mary's Environmental Science Professor Evelynn Mitchell, who in an Express-News op-ed published in May warned that the tunnel project could cut off the flow of spring water to the Edwards Aquifer and potentially contaminate the water supply.

Author and resident Light, who brought a copy of Mitchell's column, recommended that the Alamo RMA Board hire Mitchell as a consultant on the project, which — at least as of Wednesday — seems to be in a holding pattern.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1673  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2022, 6:25 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Behind-the-scenes talks continuing toward proposed San Antonio airport to downtown transit tunnel

https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/Behind-the-scenes-talks-continuing-toward-17320150.php

It’s been quiet since deciding to enter negotiations with Elon Musk’s Boring Co. on a proposed San Antonio transit tunnel system, but the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority is on track to take its next steps on the project by late this year or early 2023.

The behind-the-scenes nature of the talks, which began when the regional transportation authority’s board voted to enter discussions in mid-March, has led to some uncertainty about the future of the plan to build a loop of tunnels to ferry visitors in Tesla electric vehicles between San Antonio International Airport and downtown.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1674  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2022, 10:15 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkirbythe.... View Post
Behind-the-scenes talks continuing toward proposed San Antonio airport to downtown transit tunnel

https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/Behind-the-scenes-talks-continuing-toward-17320150.php

It’s been quiet since deciding to enter negotiations with Elon Musk’s Boring Co. on a proposed San Antonio transit tunnel system, but the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority is on track to take its next steps on the project by late this year or early 2023.

The behind-the-scenes nature of the talks, which began when the regional transportation authority’s board voted to enter discussions in mid-March, has led to some uncertainty about the future of the plan to build a loop of tunnels to ferry visitors in Tesla electric vehicles between San Antonio International Airport and downtown.
This will be nothing short of an abject failure and money hole. Musk is a conman and Vegas is proof enough at how stupid of an idea having cars in a tunnel as an express "transit" system is... Even for Texas standards for public transit, this is dystopian
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1675  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 12:32 AM
Rynetwo Rynetwo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
This will be nothing short of an abject failure and money hole. Musk is a conman and Vegas is proof enough at how stupid of an idea having cars in a tunnel as an express "transit" system is... Even for Texas standards for public transit, this is dystopian
Do you have a better idea and willing to engage the city and commit millions to reap millions?

I’m not for or against but something tells me you don’t have a dollar in the game.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1676  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 1:03 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
__________________
UnitedStateser

Last edited by kingkirbythe....; Jul 25, 2022 at 1:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1677  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 2:16 AM
Keep-SA-Lame's Avatar
Keep-SA-Lame Keep-SA-Lame is offline
COGSADCAJA- Publicist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rynetwo View Post
Do you have a better idea and willing to engage the city and commit millions to reap millions?

I’m not for or against but something tells me you don’t have a dollar in the game.
Literally doing nothing is better than this ridiculous proposal. It's embarrassing as a city we're even humoring it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1678  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 4:41 PM
forward looking forward looking is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 345
Yea but,

This giant, investment won't cost the taxpayer a one, single, nickel.
The only , single thing I do not like about it is that it runs across the re-charge zone for the Edwards Aquifer. We should not trifle with mother nature. This....is the single most important consideration.
And. It also alleviates the taxpayer of a single nickel of profit from the thing. Who knows? Someday, (2195), it might become the only the first part of a large network of a future subway grid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keep-SA-Lame View Post
Literally doing nothing is better than this ridiculous proposal. It's embarrassing as a city we're even humoring it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1679  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 9:41 PM
Rynetwo Rynetwo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keep-SA-Lame View Post
Literally doing nothing is better than this ridiculous proposal. It's embarrassing as a city we're even humoring it.
Feasibility studies should not be conducted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by forward looking View Post
This giant, investment won't cost the taxpayer a one, single, nickel.
The only , single thing I do not like about it is that it runs across the re-charge zone for the Edwards Aquifer. We should not trifle with mother nature. This....is the single most important consideration.
And. It also alleviates the taxpayer of a single nickel of profit from the thing. Who knows? Someday, (2195), it might become the only the first part of a large network of a future subway grid.
This is not over the recharge zone, but it is over the artesian zone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
This will be nothing short of an abject failure and money hole. Musk is a conman and Vegas is proof enough at how stupid of an idea having cars in a tunnel as an express "transit" system is... Even for Texas standards for public transit, this is dystopian
This project that may not happen does not warrant calling one of the most successful people in the world a conman. He brought the auto industry in the USA kicking and screaming into the electric car race.

We shall see how the project goes. Again, if a private company wants to waste money at least it is not our local tax dollars spent.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/30/23190249/boring-company-resorts-world-vegas-loop-station-photos

Last edited by Rynetwo; Jul 25, 2022 at 9:50 PM. Reason: Quoting is hard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1680  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2022, 10:43 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
You really seem to love Elon Musk, but he doesn't love you back.

__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:03 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.