HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


45 Broad Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted May 18, 2022, 8:04 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
Probably just an office to residential conversion planned with Metroloft on board, but its always of note when a site adjacent to a supertall proposal changes hands.
You mean a note of Silverstein properties potentially wanting to buy this one?

At this point even a filler would be fine, doesn't seem like a supertall is really likely here. He's probably too frugal to ball out that much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted May 18, 2022, 9:08 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
^ What are you talking about? This tower is already planned to be a supertall.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
Probably just an office to residential conversion planned with Metroloft on board, but its always of note when a site adjacent to a supertall proposal changes hands.

https://commercialobserver.com/2022/05/s...s-metro-loft-55-broad-street-180m-rudin/

Silverstein Properties and Metro Loft Buying 55 Broad Street for $180M


There was once talk of a proposal to redevelop that site, even before 45 Broad was a proposal.

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=210050
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted May 18, 2022, 9:23 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
You mean a note of Silverstein properties potentially wanting to buy this one?
Indeed. Madison Equities might want to offload with no apparent progress in restarting their tower. 180 million is actually extraordinarily cheap for a 400k SF building with paying tenants. That's the difference between Downtown and Midtown nowadays. Silverstein would probably only have to fork over a similar amount for shovel-ready 45 Broad. But as I mentioned, since Metro Loft teamed up with Silverstein for the purchase, they probably don't have an assemblage in mind. Metro Loft's portfolio consists of a number of high profile office to residential conversions downtown (notably 20 Exchange Place), so that is likely the plan after the tenants vacate. But an assemblage is food for thought.

Last edited by Hudson11; May 18, 2022 at 9:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 1:23 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
One thing about an assemblage, the tower would have to restart it’s approval process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2022, 2:28 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
A renewal underway for the special permit (subway bonus) that was approved for this tower. I believe they get to renew it twice before it expires. One thing about this permit, it didn't affect the height of the tower.



https://zap.planning.nyc.gov/projects/2022M0347

Quote:
Project Brief:

The first renewal of a special permit (C 180063 ZSM) that granted a FAR bonus in connection with subway improvements for a building located at 45 Broad Street, Community District 1, Manhattan














Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2022, 2:37 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,244
Come on baby.......come on.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2022, 3:01 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,410
I hope this rises. I'd like to see more action in Lower Manhattan.

Looks like the land use application was filed June 24, 2022. Hey... some news is better than none!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2022, 3:07 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I hope this rises. I'd like to see more action in Lower Manhattan.

Looks like the land use application was filed June 24, 2022. Hey... some news is better than none!
Yeah, it just means they still plan on building this tower. When actual work will return is anyone's guess at this point. But it may not be as far off as we think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2022, 3:21 AM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,142
This design is amazing! Let's hope it gets built to completion. Lower Manhattan needs more love. Hopefully this, 2 WTC and 80 South Street all go through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2022, 8:46 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,410

Credit: ptimberman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2022, 10:33 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,244
1,066 feet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2022, 10:37 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,410
I'll take it. I hope its just roof and not including an architectural element.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2022, 12:15 AM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,142
It's just the roof. We saw the crown elements in the renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2022, 1:56 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
It's just the roof. We saw the crown elements in the renderings.
Yeah, that’s just the main roof, which is below the bulkhead and parapet heights. Still, it’s about 48 ft lower than the roof previously. So the height cut may not be as much as we were expecting before.

Here’s what was said previously…


Quote:
A spokesperson for the developer confirmed that the condominium project is being put on hold due to “market conditions.” It’s not clear when the development team — which no longer includes Pizzarotti — will revive the project. When they do, the tower will be 80 feet shorter than the 1,115-foot-tall project initially pitched to meet Federal Aviation Administration requirements, according to Department of Building filings.

The 1,115 ft was always a reference to the main roof.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2022, 12:37 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,322
Now it says 80 stories. Less luxury and more market rate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2022, 2:27 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
Now it says 80 stories. Less luxury and more market rate?
This one was never gonna be super-luxury, but there was an office component to it. They could have dropped that, or could be shifting to rental. Or they could be numbering the same way everyone else does. Won’t know for sure until they file actual DOB documents for the amendments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2022, 8:03 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
This one was never gonna be super-luxury, but there was an office component to it. They could have dropped that, or could be shifting to rental. Or they could be numbering the same way everyone else does. Won’t know for sure until they file actual DOB documents for the amendments.
As long as it gets built with the super-luxury design, that's the main thing I care about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2022, 1:41 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,279
Downtown's golden child and Midtown's...







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2022, 5:11 PM
Drcastro Drcastro is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 425
How did this ever get put in the Under Construction section?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2022, 6:17 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
1,066 feet?
They should call it The Hastings Tower or The William Tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:09 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.