Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking
totally agree....its just like Kapyong. The master plan shows big box buildings surrounded by parking but the eye level views are of vibrant streets and smaller urban buildings focused on the street.
The master plan will not create the urban condition they are presenting in the renderings. It will be smart park 2.0. Island buildings with big spaces in between. Not walkable at all.
|
So why does it have to be that way? What are the practical reasons pushing the U of M to repeat a textbook example of how not to do a greenfield development that is sitting right at the other end of their campus?
I don't get the reason behind this sense of inevitability, as though Smartpark was the only conceivable development model the U of M could possibly follow.
Threaded Mode