Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG
former drug addicts were appalled that people shoot up openly anywhere, they said back in the day when they were using they did it as privately as possible out of sight.
|
There is a hard balance to strike:
- Keep drug use stigmatized so it is done in private and order in the public realm is preserved, but potentially lose more people to overdoses because they use drugs alone with no one to help or watch them
- De-stigmatize drugs and provide a safe supply and (theoretically) reduce overdoses, but risk normalizing drug use and getting more people addicted
I couldn't care less about a pearl-clutching tourist feeling uncomfortable seeing drug use because the importance of that pales in comparison to saving a life by preventing an overdose in a private space. However, if the relaxation of drug laws and a lack of enforcement is not having the positive effects they are intended to have, something needs to change. I think the disconnect occurs because some people on here view drug users as lost causes and would accept some "breakage" due to overdoses in private spaces if that led to more tourism dollars. I think that mindset is unconscionable.
I'm not sure that means going back to the way it was, but maybe it does mean a more heavy handed approach with involuntary rehab or changing sentencing rules for repeat offenders. What I absolutely do not agree with is turning the Downtown Eastside into some kind of "Hampersterdam" because that doesn't benefit local businesses, the drug users, residents, or anyone else.