Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaNerd
The point is we don't need to build streets for cars only. Washington Ave is a good East/West route for biking commuters, biking delivery, and general bike users.
|
This is a good point, there are a whole lot more modes of transportation that often get neglected in favor of cars. Not everyone can afford to own a car. There is dependency on walking, biking and public transportation that is way underserved by city planning, which is why the whole anti-gentrification argument is so daft. The proposed road diet was a complete compromise, it ranged from 3 to 5 lanes and did an ok job trying to make a dangerous road safer for everyone. Fighting to keep the status quo will not stop gentrification. Only an increase in the available units to meet the demand and affordable units will control the price.
I also heard some businesses are looking to sell and want the plan and zoning change, but some are definitely digging in. I think working on a public compromise on loading or whatever they're looking for is a better approach than simply working behind everyone's back to block anything.
As far as making it easy on drivers, we live in a very dense northeast city, not a southern sprawling city with tons of highways. I think it's totally appropriate to expect the driving experience to be slow and tedious and nothing should be done to change that. There are other options for drivers to quickly cut across town than Washington ave. A three plus lane road is still fairly generous by Philly standards. Currently Washington ave is 10 feet wider than broad and 20 feet wider than market. Its the same width as spring garden, which has a median going down the center and is also under review for changes. Keeping Washington ave as is is totally unacceptable. The groups who have been successful with stalling changes on the west side are now going after the east side. Hopefully they don't get anywhere with that.