Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer
The "requirement" is political rather than legal. You are right that as a practical matter a unilingual French speaker could not become PM.
|
Although most people did not complain about the quality of Jean Chretien's English.
It's interesting that Acajack always carefully analyses the quality of any anglophones French skills when they participate in a French language political debate. It's almost as if his/her elocution skills are more important than what it is that he is trying to say. I realize that the two are intertwined, and especially when you are dealing with nuance, the more skilled you are in the language of the debate, the better you will perform, but still.
This is often a sticking point with anglophones attempting to use the French language. We often feel we are being judged anytime we make the attempt, and that any sub par performance will lead to ridicule and scorn. If a francophone really wants us to use the language, then why don't they help us along in a non judgmental way????
Right now, any attempt to try and speak French can seem quite intimidating to a non native speaker. The attitude seems to be "look, I can tell that you are not
chez nous, and as far as I'm concerned, you never will be. You will never be part of the club so why are you even trying????"