Quote:
Originally Posted by Morty McDuncy
But at the same time we should be grateful for any construction that happens in DTLA regardless if you find it aesthetic or not because what makes a city vibrant isnt the height of the building or the color or the material used. However, what is important is do people want to live there?
|
Your comment makes me think of a vid like this...
https://youtu.be/Lb_-18apdkk
...where I don't see too many gaps. Or areas that remind me of the large parking lots around the Fig Hotel....or similar to a lot of the old, low slung gritty bldgs of South Pk, much less skid row. But it also doesn't appear to have any stand out features, places that look all that interesting. Of course, viewing a city through the lens of a cam in a moving car isn't the most accurate way of getting a sense of a city.
In a way I can see a person visiting the town in Washington state & then dtla & rating LA as even worse...or more disappointing. But the tone or vibe of the two places are different enough that such a critique would be missing the forest for the trees. So in a way my main concerns are both accurate but also overlook the vibe of a place.
This is from 2019 & some of the improvements mentioned by a ssper who used to post here regularly have been completed.
• Video Link
DTLA needs to fill in the gaps & clean up more of its areas. That's a given. One example: Broadway still has too many swapmeets & vacant storefronts, bldgs like the Roxy theater & sketchy sidewalks. But dtla is more interesting to me. It's the type of place that punches both above & below its weight class.
DT can say, Love me or hate me, just please don't ignore me. DTLA isn't as easily ignored as it was decades ago.