CHICAGO | One Chicago | 971 FT & 574 FT | 78 & 49 FLOORS - Page 165

gandalf612 · #**3281** Posted **Jan 23, 2022, 4:34 AM**

Not seeing any of the outrage over the random louvres not matching the glass while there was plenty with Vista. I wonder why

chicubs111 · #**3282** Posted **Jan 23, 2022, 4:45 AM**

^ prolly because its hidden away in a less prominent spot of the building vs being smack dab in the middle of vista's most photographed angle from grant park...the fact most people prolly never even noticed this until you brought it up shows that its been hidden fairly well as opposed to Vista

rgarri4 · #**3283** Posted **Jan 23, 2022, 5:38 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by gandalf612

Not seeing any of the outrage over the random louvres not matching the glass while there was plenty with Vista. I wonder why

Lol come on bro. Do you really don't know why? How many people on this forum even know that those louvers exist on this project.

JMKeynes · #**3284** Posted **Jan 23, 2022, 4:06 PM**

It looks great to me.

P.S.: Isn't there supposed to be a fountain too?

sentinel · #**3285** Posted **Jan 24, 2022, 11:39 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris08876

Distances by kedar datta, on Flickr

Cross-posting Chris' link to highlight another great photo from the same photographer, this time showcasing One Chicago

Peace of mind by kedar datta, on Flickr

rivernorthlurker · #**3286** Posted **Jan 25, 2022, 6:50 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by sentinel

Cross-posting Chris' link to highlight another great photo from the same photographer, this time showcasing One Chicago

Peace of mind by kedar datta, on Flickr

Amazing vantage and also an excellent shot of that L shaped parking lot apparently owned by Loyola next to Lawson House that was previously discussed.

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9506600&postcount=49995

The Lurker · #**3287** Posted **Jan 25, 2022, 8:50 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker

Amazing vantage and also an excellent shot of that L shaped parking lot apparently owned by Loyola next to Lawson House that was previously discussed.

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9506600&postcount=49995

That's the only surface lot I can see in that pic. Hopefully Loyola builds something nice.

OhioGuy · #**3288** Posted **Feb 3, 2022, 4:48 PM**

Photos: Urbanize tours the nearly complete One Chicago development
The mixed-use complex includes two towers and reaches 971 feet in height
FEBRUARY 03, 2022, 7:00AM LUKAS KUGLER

Quote:

The expansive One Chicago development is nearly complete and Urbanize got an inside look at the construction. Planned to deliver 735 rental apartments and 77 for-sale condominiums, the two-tower plan is a venture of JDL Development. Located in the heart of River North, the design is a product of collaboration between Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture and Goettsch Partners. Since Urbanize’s last tour, the tower crane is down, glass is up, and the construction hoist has been removed.

Double L · #**3289** Posted **Feb 4, 2022, 5:01 PM**

I like how this building fuses old and new architectural styles and I like how it has an elevated park and I like how there is a setback from the street, allowing the street to be more open.

rlw777 · #**3290** Posted **Feb 4, 2022, 5:43 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMKeynes

It looks great to me.

P.S.: Isn't there supposed to be a fountain too?

Yeah not sure when they decided to remove it but here's the original

Ricochet48 · #**3291** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 2:30 PM**

The hobos & crackheads around the McD's would destroy the fountain, probably a good move liability wise.

thegoatman · #**3292** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 2:43 PM**

I said this before and i'm going to say it again, that red line mcdonalds next to this building is a stain on our city. Not only is it a crime magnet, its a 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 suburban fast food joint with a drive thru literally right next to a subway stop.

Prime spot for a massive mixed use project. Mcdonalds will pay for cursing our city with so many suburban buildings through out our city and refusing to sell lol.

rivernorthlurker · #**3293** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 2:46 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegoatman

I said this before and i'm going to say it again, that red line mcdonalds next to this building is a stain on our city. Not only is it a crime magnet, its a 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 suburban fast food joint with a drive thru literally right next to a subway stop.

Prime spot for a massive mixed use project. Mcdonalds will pay for cursing our city with so many suburban buildings through out our city and refusing to sell lol.

Can't disagree. It won't last forever, but it will probably last a pretty long time. But I definitely see that location going before the one next to Portillo's.

the urban politician · #**3294** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 3:30 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegoatman

I said this before and i'm going to say it again, that red line mcdonalds next to this building is a stain on our city. Not only is it a crime magnet, its a 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 suburban fast food joint with a drive thru literally right next to a subway stop.

Prime spot for a massive mixed use project. Mcdonalds will pay for cursing our city with so many suburban buildings through out our city and refusing to sell lol.

A bit over the top (“stain on our city”?)

But yeah, it’s a poor use of land and full of rather shady people, but isn’t that what cities are about? We can’t have everything be sterile playgrounds for rich 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 like you and me, we need a place for crack dealers to do their thing too.

Best solution is to have the site redeveloped into a highrise while McDonald’s continues to occupy the base. Then everybody wins

nomarandlee · #**3295** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 4:10 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by rlw777

Yeah not sure when they decided to remove it but here's the original

Definitely a huge downgrade for the ground/street level design between removal of the fountain, greenery moat, and awning removal.

rivernorthlurker · #**3296** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 4:24 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomarandlee

Definitely a huge downgrade for the ground/street level design between removal of the fountain, greenery moat, and awning removal.

More greenery on the south face tho.

nomarandlee · #**3297** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 5:45 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker

More greenery on the south face tho.

No. Why take the trees that were nicely separating the street from pedestrians and move them in order to separate pedestrians from the nice ground floor windows. I'd guess to impede future mobs/rioters? but from a design perspective, I think it a loss.

JMKeynes · #**3298** Posted **Feb 5, 2022, 8:31 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by rlw777

Yeah not sure when they decided to remove it but here's the original

That 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵. Chicago and NY are leaders with nice water features.

chicubs111 · #**3299** Posted **Feb 6, 2022, 3:03 PM**

^ Chicago a leader in water features?...sorry wish that was true...name me some nice water features that have been built in this city in the last 20 years (outside of grant park)?...its a shame this was removed because these type of creative fountains/water pools could add to the street level landscape of this city.

JMKeynes · #**3300** Posted **Feb 6, 2022, 3:59 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicubs111

^ Chicago a leader in water features?...sorry wish that was true...name me some nice water features that have been built in this city in the last 20 years (outside of grant park)?...its a shame this was removed because these type of creative fountains/water pools could add to the street level landscape of this city.

Not necessarily new ones but Buckingham Fountain, the Centennial Fountain, the water feature at the Hancock Center, and the fountains by the Art Institute.