Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician
I don’t think his personal tax burden is really that big of a motivating factor for him—he can abandon Illinois in a heartbeat if he wants to. I think he is more interested in Illinois cleaning up its image financially and becoming more welcome to investment so that companies (and people) can grow and thrive without worrying about what new ways to generate revenue the various bloated Government bodies in this State will come up with. And that is 100% on the table for the Democrats. Nothing is not fair game with them running things.
|
You seem to hold both of these ideas in your head without seeing the irony:
- Alderpeople in Chicago are selfish idiots only in it for themselves
- Ken Griffin is a benevolent billionaire looking out for the working man
The way you speak about each shows pretty clearly where the bias lives. Billionaires don't make investment without expecting a return on that investment. It's the main tenant of financial investing, which is Ken Griffin's specialty.
I think KG stays in Chicago because he likes Chicago. We shouldn't bend over backwards to make him stay. All the things he wants to change have been present since he started his company here in 1990. People who deeply care about a place don't threaten to leave if they don't get their way.
Do you think Pritzker is as benevolent as KG? It's hard to tell because everytime you bring him up, you make fun of his weight and mention his inheritance. Two things which have nothing to do with his governing or his motivations. What, other than his politics aligning with yours, makes you believe KG cares about anything other than his bottom line? He should run for Governor himself if he cares so deeply, then we might actually know what he stands for/against.