HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3541  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 1:05 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,693
Radisson Hotel Philadelphia reopens after $10 million renovation, nearly two-year Covid-19 hiatus

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia...tel-phialdelphia-reopens-renovation.html

"The Radisson Hotel Philadelphia has reopened after a nearly two-year Covid-19 hiatus during which the property underwent a more than $10 million renovation. "

"The newly updated rooms at the property offer views of the city skyline or the nearby Stadium Complex and are retrofitted with amenities like flatscreen TVs with streaming services, Wi-Fi, and mini refrigerators. Suites include kitchenettes and a separate seating area for larger groups."

"As part of the remodel, the new open-concept lobby offers individual check-in pods, coffee and tea facilities, and a snack shop, according to the hotel. It also is home to the Whit Lounge, an on-site bar and restaurant serving classic American fare all day."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3542  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 5:43 PM
Jayfar's Avatar
Jayfar Jayfar is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC View Post
Radisson Hotel Philadelphia reopens after $10 million renovation, nearly two-year Covid-19 hiatus

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia...tel-phialdelphia-reopens-renovation.html

"The Radisson Hotel Philadelphia has reopened after a nearly two-year Covid-19 hiatus during which the property underwent a more than $10 million renovation. "

"The newly updated rooms at the property offer views of the city skyline or the nearby Stadium Complex and are retrofitted with amenities like flatscreen TVs with streaming services, Wi-Fi, and mini refrigerators. Suites include kitchenettes and a separate seating area for larger groups."

"As part of the remodel, the new open-concept lobby offers individual check-in pods, coffee and tea facilities, and a snack shop, according to the hotel. It also is home to the Whit Lounge, an on-site bar and restaurant serving classic American fare all day."
For anyone not familiar with it, that's the hotel at 2033 Penrose Ave.

Brian Hickey did this write-up for PhillyVoice in 2019: Is this prominent South Philly fixture the worst hotel in the city?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3543  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 6:56 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
But that's my point. If it's going to take years, then we can't be nashville or austin that quadroupled overnight. Somewhere around 2010 both cities were at a point where more than half the people living in each city were not residents of the city a decade or so earlier. Come on man, you know nothing like that could ever come close to happening here.

Philly is both much much bigger than either of those cities were when their explosive growth started and we're not even growing at a fraction of a fraction of the same rate.

Philly has over 1.5 million people. We added less than 80 thousand people the past ten years. What is the best case scenario for the next 10 years? 150 Thou? 200? Maybe even 300???? Even if our growth explodes exponentially from where it has been, the people who have been here, will always SIGNIFICANTLY outnumber the newcomers. And as those newcomers live in a city dominated by long time Philadelphians, our culture will rub off on them, and especially their children who grow up here.

Simply put we're already too big and our growth rate is too slow, there's no realistic scenario where philadelphians become outnumbered by newcomers. So what happened in nashville and austin is truly impossible.
Fair points but I don't agree with you on the impossible part because when you mix the right ingredients together things can shift dramatically. And check this out:

https://phillyyimby.com/2022/01/philadelphia-poised-for-record-construction-activity-in-2022.html

And Philly is now one of the least affordable cities for singles:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/06/realestate/best-worst-places-to-rent-studios.html

I do understand where you are coming from with the Philadelphians piece but I just don't think that culture is going to be hanging on for the years to come like we have seen to date. It may always be there but in a much smaller fashion than we are used to.

This is uncharted territory for the area and in many ways it's exciting because what many people wanted to see is happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3544  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 10:39 PM
chimpskibot chimpskibot is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastSideHBG View Post

I do understand where you are coming from with the Philadelphians piece but I just don't think that culture is going to be hanging on for the years to come like we have seen to date. It may always be there but in a much smaller fashion than we are used to.

This is uncharted territory for the area and in many ways it's exciting because what many people wanted to see is happening.
Stop being a doomer! Jeez its a real mood killer. Lick your wounds and move on. In no way is Philly the most unaffordable for single renters when you can buy property in the city for less than a used car. You cant do that in any other major city in America (950K+) Period! Culture changes its part of life, thats what is beautiful about cities!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3545  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 10:44 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,693
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3546  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 1:26 AM
bigfish bigfish is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 140
Would you say that the Broad and Washington project is the largest (unit count) project in modern Philadelphia history? It is definitely one that I am most excited about. 1100+ units on top of a subway station!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3547  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 2:11 AM
chimpskibot chimpskibot is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfish View Post
Would you say that the Broad and Washington project is the largest (unit count) project in modern Philadelphia history? It is definitely one that I am most excited about. 1100+ units on top of a subway station!
Including the lot next door, Yes. However, I think Piazza Terminal in NoLibs has more units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3548  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 3:24 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by chimpskibot View Post
Stop being a doomer! Jeez its a real mood killer. Lick your wounds and move on. In no way is Philly the most unaffordable for single renters when you can buy property in the city for less than a used car. You cant do that in any other major city in America (950K+) Period! Culture changes its part of life, thats what is beautiful about cities!
Doomer? Mood killer? Lick your wounds and move on? Quite dramatic once again! And who is going to settle down in a neighborhood where the property costs less than a used car? And you mention renters but then talk about buying property?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3549  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 6:36 PM
City Wide City Wide is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfish View Post
Would you say that the Broad and Washington project is the largest (unit count) project in modern Philadelphia history? It is definitely one that I am most excited about. 1100+ units on top of a subway station!
"Modern Philadelphia history" When did that start? History, yes; modern, not so sure of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3550  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 7:24 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide View Post
"Modern Philadelphia history" When did that start?
The day that Gritty was revealed to the world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3551  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 7:44 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastSideHBG View Post
Fair points but I don't agree with you on the impossible part because when you mix the right ingredients together things can shift dramatically. And check this out:

https://phillyyimby.com/2022/01/philadelphia-poised-for-record-construction-activity-in-2022.html

And Philly is now one of the least affordable cities for singles:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/06/realestate/best-worst-places-to-rent-studios.html

I do understand where you are coming from with the Philadelphians piece but I just don't think that culture is going to be hanging on for the years to come like we have seen to date. It may always be there but in a much smaller fashion than we are used to.

This is uncharted territory for the area and in many ways it's exciting because what many people wanted to see is happening.
It doesn't matter how unprecedented Philly's growth is. Comparisons to Austin and Nashville are just completely off base. Philly is not going to come close doubling it's population in a couple of decades, much less quadrupling it.

It's possible for Philadelphia to grow at a rate far beyond anything we've seen in recent history, and for that growth rate to still not even come remotely close to what happened in Nashville and Austin. You have to understand how extreme of an outlier these cities population explosions were. Nothing even approaching that will ever happen in Philadelphia.

A more apt comparison would be a city like Boston. In 2000 Boston had nearly 600,000 people, 20 years later they're approaching 700,000 people. They added nearly 100 thousand people in two decades, or about 15% growth. Comparable growth over the next two decades for Philly would be a growth of roughly 250 thousand people, which would bring up population to around 1,850,000 people. To be clear, adding 250,000 people over the next two decades is still WELL ABOVE the best estimates that currently exist. But even if we consider this type of growth that is beyond what most would expect, we're still looking at a Boston like population explosion which doesn't really reassemble Nashville and Austin. People certainly accuse Boston of catering more to the wealthy and losing a certain edge, but would anyone say that Boston isn't Boston anymore? That their unique culture has disappeared? Come on. Your fears of Philadelphia losing its unique culture is just completely unfounded.

We are in uncharted territory, but we're nowhere even remotely near the growth rate that would do the things you're fearful of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3552  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 2:34 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
A more apt comparison would be a city like Boston. In 2000 Boston had nearly 600,000 people, 20 years later they're approaching 700,000 people. They added nearly 100 thousand people in two decades, or about 15% growth. Comparable growth over the next two decades for Philly would be a growth of roughly 250 thousand people, which would bring up population to around 1,850,000 people. To be clear, adding 250,000 people over the next two decades is still WELL ABOVE the best estimates that currently exist. But even if we consider this type of growth that is beyond what most would expect, we're still looking at a Boston like population explosion which doesn't really reassemble Nashville and Austin. People certainly accuse Boston of catering more to the wealthy and losing a certain edge, but would anyone say that Boston isn't Boston anymore? That their unique culture has disappeared? Come on. Your fears of Philadelphia losing its unique culture is just completely unfounded.

We are in uncharted territory, but we're nowhere even remotely near the growth rate that would do the things you're fearful of.

I was thinking the best comparison might be Boston. It's posting strong growth numbers but sorta flying under the radar because it's not that big to begin with and everyone on the East Coast (that grew) was sorta blown out of the water by NYC, not because it grew (we all knew it was growing), but because the Census Bureau was so spectacularly wrong in its estimates prior to the official count.

I have not been to Boston in about a decade, so I'd be curious to see how it has filled in. It contends with space limitations in a way we don't (smaller and hemmed in by water on basically 2 sides) and it is a somewhat low rise city to begin with. From what I've read, much of Fort Point has filled in (it used to be completely barren) and I'd have to assume there is a lot of midrise multi-family development stretching out into the neighborhoods like Dorchester, Roxbury, and Roslindale. I would have to think that it feels more vibrant outside of the usual suspects (Back Bay, South End, Cambridge, Faneuil Hall, North End, etc).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3553  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 2:44 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
It doesn't matter how unprecedented Philly's growth is. Comparisons to Austin and Nashville are just completely off base. Philly is not going to come close doubling it's population in a couple of decades, much less quadrupling it.

It's possible for Philadelphia to grow at a rate far beyond anything we've seen in recent history, and for that growth rate to still not even come remotely close to what happened in Nashville and Austin. You have to understand how extreme of an outlier these cities population explosions were. Nothing even approaching that will ever happen in Philadelphia.

A more apt comparison would be a city like Boston. In 2000 Boston had nearly 600,000 people, 20 years later they're approaching 700,000 people. They added nearly 100 thousand people in two decades, or about 15% growth. Comparable growth over the next two decades for Philly would be a growth of roughly 250 thousand people, which would bring up population to around 1,850,000 people. To be clear, adding 250,000 people over the next two decades is still WELL ABOVE the best estimates that currently exist. But even if we consider this type of growth that is beyond what most would expect, we're still looking at a Boston like population explosion which doesn't really reassemble Nashville and Austin. People certainly accuse Boston of catering more to the wealthy and losing a certain edge, but would anyone say that Boston isn't Boston anymore? That their unique culture has disappeared? Come on. Your fears of Philadelphia losing its unique culture is just completely unfounded.
Yes, many long-time residents do feel that Boston isn't what it was anymore. Same with DC. Same with... But the big difference here is that a large part of Philly culture is being affordable and rough around the edges, generations hanging around, not many newcomers. If that keeps shifting...

Quote:
We are in uncharted territory, but we're nowhere even remotely near the growth rate that would do the things you're fearful of.
My point was to compare cities that had their own unique cultures that were affordable and then the right recipe caused a change.

Good discussion! I will follow up on this in 5-10 years and see where we are at then
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3554  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 3:44 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,693
Sort of on topic, but a mini rant.

I just finished the new Kevin Hart show on Netflix "True Story". It was actually good, a murder/suspense type, and Philadelphia served as a solid setting. It wasn't made out to be some sort of miserable place like in Mare of Easttown (even though I loved that show). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP1PAEaszVM

Anyways, my annoyance... Most of the skyline shots and videos were from 10 years ago. Comcast 2, FMC, EVO, etc. were missing in almost every shot, and not even under construction. EVO completed in 2014. Also ironic that he was staying in the Philadelphia Four Seasons (different building in the show), yet the real building didn't exist in the skyline shots.

Does this happen in other cities (Chicago, Boston, Dallas, etc.)? I don't watch enough shows to know. I'm almost certain new shows in New York would not feature a 2010 Manhattan skyline.

Either way, good to see shows in set in Philadelphia, though True Story was only partially filmed in the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3555  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 4:44 PM
Mikieman Mikieman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 136
Funny about True Story, I noticed the same thing, the best was one of the shots where the skyline was CGI'd in at the wrong angle, I could figure it out to save my life then I realized what was happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3556  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 10:30 PM
Radio5 Radio5 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC View Post
Sort of on topic, but a mini rant.

I just finished the new Kevin Hart show on Netflix "True Story". It was actually good, a murder/suspense type, and Philadelphia served as a solid setting. It wasn't made out to be some sort of miserable place like in Mare of Easttown (even though I loved that show). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP1PAEaszVM

Anyways, my annoyance... Most of the skyline shots and videos were from 10 years ago. Comcast 2, FMC, EVO, etc. were missing in almost every shot, and not even under construction. EVO completed in 2014. Also ironic that he was staying in the Philadelphia Four Seasons (different building in the show), yet the real building didn't exist in the skyline shots.

Does this happen in other cities (Chicago, Boston, Dallas, etc.)? I don't watch enough shows to know. I'm almost certain new shows in New York would not feature a 2010 Manhattan skyline.

Either way, good to see shows in set in Philadelphia, though True Story was only partially filmed in the city.
It definitely happens for most city shots. Even LA. There are tons of new buildings in downtown LA, but you never see them in the city shots. Cost more money when they can just use an already filmed shot for pennies on the dollar and nobody but people like us would notice. But, yes, still annoying. I also would imagine, new buildings might take away attention, where as everyone is used to these stock city clips.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3557  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 10:42 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,263
^
Even commercials or other live tv events I have seen broadcasted, they use old stock video of the city. It's just pure laziness on not researching what the current skyline looks like in major cities with the amount of videos swirling around the internet. They could also ask for permission to use any of the great drone footage from IG or whatever, of these cities. And, it's kind of funny when you see your city with throwback video footage like oh, where have these folks been to know that footage was capture in the late 90 or early 2000s.

Last edited by iheartphilly; Jan 9, 2022 at 10:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3558  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2022, 4:41 AM
therealdawk therealdawk is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC View Post
Sort of on topic, but a mini rant.

I just finished the new Kevin Hart show on Netflix "True Story". It was actually good, a murder/suspense type, and Philadelphia served as a solid setting. It wasn't made out to be some sort of miserable place like in Mare of Easttown (even though I loved that show). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP1PAEaszVM

Anyways, my annoyance... Most of the skyline shots and videos were from 10 years ago. Comcast 2, FMC, EVO, etc. were missing in almost every shot, and not even under construction. EVO completed in 2014. Also ironic that he was staying in the Philadelphia Four Seasons (different building in the show), yet the real building didn't exist in the skyline shots.

Does this happen in other cities (Chicago, Boston, Dallas, etc.)? I don't watch enough shows to know. I'm almost certain new shows in New York would not feature a 2010 Manhattan skyline.

Either way, good to see shows in set in Philadelphia, though True Story was only partially filmed in the city.
This is funny. I'm the nerd in the crowd who when watching a national game on TV for the Sixers or Eagles will scream out to the others around me when they're using a stock video of the skyline as they come back from commercial break or whatever. It annoys the heck out of me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3559  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2022, 12:30 PM
reparcsyks reparcsyks is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC View Post
Sort of on topic, but a mini rant.

I just finished the new Kevin Hart show on Netflix "True Story". It was actually good, a murder/suspense type, and Philadelphia served as a solid setting. It wasn't made out to be some sort of miserable place like in Mare of Easttown (even though I loved that show). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP1PAEaszVM

Anyways, my annoyance... Most of the skyline shots and videos were from 10 years ago. Comcast 2, FMC, EVO, etc. were missing in almost every shot, and not even under construction. EVO completed in 2014. Also ironic that he was staying in the Philadelphia Four Seasons (different building in the show), yet the real building didn't exist in the skyline shots.

Does this happen in other cities (Chicago, Boston, Dallas, etc.)? I don't watch enough shows to know. I'm almost certain new shows in New York would not feature a 2010 Manhattan skyline.

Either way, good to see shows in set in Philadelphia, though True Story was only partially filmed in the city.
I bet none of it was filmed in Philly. Any Philly footage was, as you saw, stock. Funniest moment for me was when he was on “Spring Garden Street” and the next block was “Spruce Street.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3560  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2022, 2:24 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikieman View Post
Funny about True Story, I noticed the same thing, the best was one of the shots where the skyline was CGI'd in at the wrong angle, I could figure it out to save my life then I realized what was happening.
I noticed that too! And there were several scenes in the hotel and the skyline outside the window was clearly Downtown LA. I spent more time studying the skyline shots than focusing on the actual show, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio5 View Post
It definitely happens for most city shots. Even LA. There are tons of new buildings in downtown LA, but you never see them in the city shots. Cost more money when they can just use an already filmed shot for pennies on the dollar and nobody but people like us would notice. But, yes, still annoying. I also would imagine, new buildings might take away attention, where as everyone is used to these stock city clips.
At least it's uniform laziness. I still fear that this laziness happens for in Philadelphia. (No fault of the city).

Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
^
Even commercials or other live tv events I have seen broadcasted, they use old stock video of the city. It's just pure laziness on not researching what the current skyline looks like in major cities with the amount of videos swirling around the internet. They could also ask for permission to use any of the great drone footage from IG or whatever, of these cities. And, it's kind of funny when you see your city with throwback video footage like oh, where have these folks been to know that footage was capture in the late 90 or early 2000s.
Yea IG has some of the most beautiful and up to date skyline vistas, drone videos, glamour shots, etc. It can't cost much for Producers to have an intern spend a day researching Philadelphia (or any city) skyline videos for a new show and then request permission from the user and pay a small fee. I guess it really is laziness or lack of astuteness when researching.

Quote:
Originally Posted by therealdawk View Post
This is funny. I'm the nerd in the crowd who when watching a national game on TV for the Sixers or Eagles will scream out to the others around me when they're using a stock video of the skyline as they come back from commercial break or whatever. It annoys the heck out of me.
Same! whenever there is a Philly show or big event and shots from around the city or area are shown on TV, I feel the need to prepare a disclaimer for my friends about where that shot is, if it's up to date, share details about new buildings planned in Philadelphia, and then I wind up on a tangent about all the development and changes in the city, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by reparcsyks View Post
I bet none of it was filmed in Philly. Any Philly footage was, as you saw, stock. Funniest moment for me was when he was on “Spring Garden Street” and the next block was “Spruce Street.”
Per sources I read, it was filmed mostly in LA with certain scenes filmed in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. Did the PA film tax credits expire? Seems like some recent shows and movies take place in Philadelphia, but filmed elsewhere?
And yea fake locations is nothing new. I think it was the movie Baby Mama, and they were rushing to Penn Hospital for the birth and went over one of the bridges into New Jersey, I was like, uhh... But I see the same thing in New York. For example — and the City always messed locations up, but most people don't realize.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.