HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #821  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2021, 11:16 PM
ColSJ's Avatar
ColSJ ColSJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 854
The Skyline- 35 units

Here is an electronic version of the renderings which is dubbed "The Skyline".

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #822  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2021, 1:19 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,356
Fundy Quay to have 677 units. The packet in PAC docs is a really good read if you are development nerdy

Last edited by cdnguys; Dec 11, 2021 at 1:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #823  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2021, 1:57 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 2,019
Someone is working on the 3-flat building at 83 Mecklenberg. I know most small projects don't normally get mentioned in detail here, but this building is totally filled with cool wainscoting and hopefully will turn out impressively. I briefly owned this building in 2018 but it was way too much for me to tackle at the time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #824  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2021, 4:47 PM
bridgeoftea's Avatar
bridgeoftea bridgeoftea is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
Fundy Quay to have 677 units. The packet in PAC docs is a really good read if you are development nerdy
Can you share the documents please? I'd love to have a read!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #825  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2021, 5:10 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 2,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by bridgeoftea View Post
Can you share the documents please? I'd love to have a read!
Here's a link: https://pub-saintjohn.escribemeetings.co...enda&lang=English&Item=7&Tab=attachments (Click on "Staff Report.pdf" to view the documents).

Here's the website where the agendas can be viewed: https://saintjohn.ca/en/city-hall/council-and-committees/minutes-agendas-and-records
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #826  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2021, 5:38 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,356
The peer review does not recommend the overhead pedway. I completely agree, you are taking people / customers away from the street that businesses rely on. Plus as another contributor on this board mentioned - it destroyed the quintessential look of the view up King St to the square
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #827  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2021, 6:45 PM
bridgeoftea's Avatar
bridgeoftea bridgeoftea is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
Here's a link: https://pub-saintjohn.escribemeetings.co...enda&lang=English&Item=7&Tab=attachments (Click on "Staff Report.pdf" to view the documents).

Here's the website where the agendas can be viewed: https://saintjohn.ca/en/city-hall/council-and-committees/minutes-agendas-and-records

Thanks for the links!
Every time I read through the proposals and see the renders, I always get really excited. Fingers and toes crossed this becomes a complete success.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #828  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2021, 7:21 PM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
The peer review does not recommend the overhead pedway. I completely agree, you are taking people / customers away from the street that businesses rely on. Plus as another contributor on this board mentioned - it destroyed the quintessential look of the view up King St to the square
So glad to hear that - hope all the recommendations get adopted and the pedway gets killed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #829  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2021, 3:25 AM
Pugsley Pugsley is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
The peer review does not recommend the overhead pedway. I completely agree, you are taking people / customers away from the street that businesses rely on. Plus as another contributor on this board mentioned - it destroyed the quintessential look of the view up King St to the square
I think that was me and yes, very happy to see they are postponing the approval on the pedway, but it isn't dead yet sadly...simply postponed for decision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #830  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2021, 4:35 PM
bridgeoftea's Avatar
bridgeoftea bridgeoftea is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 698
According to 94 Country it got the PAC approval not sure if that was already mentioned
https://www.country94.ca/2021/12/21/leinster-street-development-gets-pac-approval/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #831  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2021, 3:01 AM
ColSJ's Avatar
ColSJ ColSJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 854
Status update of the Wellington.



Photo credit: http://urbanplans.blogspot.com/?m=1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #832  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2021, 7:15 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,416
Water St. / Prince William St. Demo

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #833  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2021, 9:39 PM
NewIreland NewIreland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helladog View Post
Water St. / Prince William St. Demo

Those century beams look tantalizing. I wonder what will become of them?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #834  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2021, 10:27 PM
ColSJ's Avatar
ColSJ ColSJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 854
I noticed 210 Canterbury the building tucked in between Cavanaugh’s Ocean Side & Atlantic buildings sold ($300,000) just shy of the opening date of the Atlantic. According to the Atlantic’s Facebook page just 1 unit remains available in the building so I’m wondering if he’s looking for his next project. He already owns like 80% of that entire block so it wouldn’t surprise me. Regardless of who bought it, I hope they do something with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #835  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2021, 2:54 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColSJ View Post
I noticed 210 Canterbury the building tucked in between Cavanaugh’s Ocean Side & Atlantic buildings sold ($300,000) just shy of the opening date of the Atlantic. According to the Atlantic’s Facebook page just 1 unit remains available in the building so I’m wondering if he’s looking for his next project. He already owns like 80% of that entire block so it wouldn’t surprise me. Regardless of who bought it, I hope they do something with it.
Funny you mention that- I just heard 222 Water has something to do with him. Here's hoping there's no modular panels or corrugated metal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #836  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2021, 6:40 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Funny you mention that- I just heard 222 Water has something to do with him. Here's hoping there's no modular panels or corrugated metal.
I assume the Leinster Street project is Mike’s too since it looks almost identical. Although decent enough looking for those secondary locations, I would like to see something of a higher calibre at 222 Water St
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #837  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2021, 4:35 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
I assume the Leinster Street project is Mike’s too since it looks almost identical. Although decent enough looking for those secondary locations, I would like to see something of a higher calibre at 222 Water St
I can't confirm Leinster is his, it might just be the same 'architects'.

222 Water demands something high quality. It will have to be tall- the building and Murder Hill lot next door are only 97'x93' more or less. Since it's only two blocks from Fundy Quay and blocks precisely 0 residential sightlines I'd like to see something nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #838  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2021, 6:31 PM
homebody homebody is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
I can't confirm Leinster is his, it might just be the same 'architects'.

222 Water demands something high quality. It will have to be tall- the building and Murder Hill lot next door are only 97'x93' more or less. Since it's only two blocks from Fundy Quay and blocks precisely 0 residential sightlines I'd like to see something nice.
Is there any talk at all of what is going to happen at 222 Water?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #839  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2021, 9:34 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebody View Post
Is there any talk at all of what is going to happen at 222 Water?
Not that I am aware of. I understand it came down for structural reasons, not imminent construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #840  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2022, 12:24 AM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Colin O’Brien @COB16_
A total of 7 new “large scale” construction projects are set to break ground #uptownsj in 2022!

These projects amount to 353 new residential units in Uptown Saint John!

We can expect this number to grow after the spring phase of approvals.


https://twitter.com/COB16_/status/1477329360340365314/photo/1
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.